Nationwide Regulatory Reform Starting from China’s Free Trade Zones

J. Huang
{"title":"Nationwide Regulatory Reform Starting from China’s Free Trade Zones","authors":"J. Huang","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198827450.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before conducting profound reforms of the trade and investment legal framework, China often implements the reform on a small scale, generally in specified geographic zones as testing grounds. After these testing grounds generate fruitful results, the reform may be implemented nationwide. A typical example is the five special economic zones established in the 1980s. After the Cultural Revolution, the first round of Chinese regulatory reform in trade and investment took place in 1978. Led by the late Premier Deng Xiaoping, China implemented the opening-up policy. Deng established five special economic zones to attract foreign investment by allowing a greater role for individual autonomy and Western-style market forces. Lessons learned from the special economic zones were implemented nationwide. For example, the corporate Sino-foreign joint venture was first tested in special economic zones and, after it proved successful, was adopted nationwide. These zones are also the pioneers in China to use tax holidays to attract foreign investment and many regions in inland China followed their example. In the 1990s, special economic zones gradually ended their mission as testing grounds. Among all the regulatory reforms conducted in the free trade zones (FTZs), adopting a negative list to regulate the foreign investment market access is important, because it significantly departs from China’s long-time domestic practice and aims to bridge China’s investment law with high-standard international agreements. This chapter focuses on the negative list adopted by China’s FTZs to regulate access to foreign investment markets and explores its significance, analyses its insufficiencies, and proposes suggestions for improvement.","PeriodicalId":112957,"journal":{"name":"China's International Investment Strategy","volume":"481 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China's International Investment Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198827450.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Before conducting profound reforms of the trade and investment legal framework, China often implements the reform on a small scale, generally in specified geographic zones as testing grounds. After these testing grounds generate fruitful results, the reform may be implemented nationwide. A typical example is the five special economic zones established in the 1980s. After the Cultural Revolution, the first round of Chinese regulatory reform in trade and investment took place in 1978. Led by the late Premier Deng Xiaoping, China implemented the opening-up policy. Deng established five special economic zones to attract foreign investment by allowing a greater role for individual autonomy and Western-style market forces. Lessons learned from the special economic zones were implemented nationwide. For example, the corporate Sino-foreign joint venture was first tested in special economic zones and, after it proved successful, was adopted nationwide. These zones are also the pioneers in China to use tax holidays to attract foreign investment and many regions in inland China followed their example. In the 1990s, special economic zones gradually ended their mission as testing grounds. Among all the regulatory reforms conducted in the free trade zones (FTZs), adopting a negative list to regulate the foreign investment market access is important, because it significantly departs from China’s long-time domestic practice and aims to bridge China’s investment law with high-standard international agreements. This chapter focuses on the negative list adopted by China’s FTZs to regulate access to foreign investment markets and explores its significance, analyses its insufficiencies, and proposes suggestions for improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从中国自贸区开始的全国性监管改革
在对贸易和投资法律框架进行深刻改革之前,中国经常以小规模实施改革,通常在特定的地理区域作为试验场。在这些试验场取得丰硕成果后,改革可能会在全国范围内实施。一个典型的例子就是上世纪80年代建立的五个经济特区。文化大革命之后,中国在贸易和投资方面的第一轮监管改革于1978年开始。邓建立了五个经济特区,通过允许个人自治和西方式的市场力量发挥更大的作用来吸引外国投资。从经济特区吸取的经验教训在全国范围内实施。例如,中外合资企业首先在经济特区进行试验,在取得成功后,在全国范围内推广。这些自贸区也是中国利用免税期吸引外资的先行者,中国内陆的许多地区都效仿了他们的做法。20世纪90年代,经济特区逐渐结束了作为试验场的使命。在自由贸易区的监管改革中,采用负面清单来规范外商投资市场准入是一项重要的改革,因为它明显背离了中国长期以来的国内做法,旨在将中国的投资法与高标准的国际协定联系起来。本章以中国自贸区对外投资市场准入负面清单为重点,探讨其意义,分析其不足,并提出改进建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Era in Cross-strait Relations? A Post-sovereign Enquiry in Taiwan’s Investment Treaty System The RCEP Investment Rules and China The Political Economy of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment in ‘One-Belt, One-Road (OBOR)’ Countries Chinese SOE Investments and the National Security Protection under IIAs Substantive Provisions of the East Asian Trilateral Investment Agreement and their Implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1