Zukunftsfähiger internationaler Rechtsrahmen für Investitionen in Afrika

L. Gramlich
{"title":"Zukunftsfähiger internationaler Rechtsrahmen für Investitionen in Afrika","authors":"L. Gramlich","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The future of sustainable development in Africa and for its growing population will depend on investments which might come mostly from abroad attracted by a favourable investment climate (or ecosystem). It is rather doubtful that the actual („old“) international legal framework for investment-related and investment-specific measures which does hardly create an adequate balance between the interests of all important public as well as private stakeholders would meet the requirement of today and tomorrow. But any alterations or improvements must start from the present state of things. So, this study looks at the different levels and various instruments dealing with traditional standards of investment and investor protection, e.g. BITs und TIPs, and at the activities of global, regional and sub-regional organizations (in particular EU and OHADA). Moreover, new developments at global and regional levels are discussed including trends showing a somewhat specific African approach to investment issues (“Africanization”). Finally, a very important topic, i.e. the relation between investment protection and human rights (of investors and of other people negatively affected by relevant activities), is described and assessed in more detail. A second part of the analysis will turn to elaborating on dispute settlement and enforcement issues since till today, there seems to be a sharp distinction between Investor-State- Dispute Settlement (ISDS) by way of mediation, conciliation and arbitration on the one hand and judicial redress by national courts (of home, host or third States) on the other.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"14 2 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recht in Afrika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The future of sustainable development in Africa and for its growing population will depend on investments which might come mostly from abroad attracted by a favourable investment climate (or ecosystem). It is rather doubtful that the actual („old“) international legal framework for investment-related and investment-specific measures which does hardly create an adequate balance between the interests of all important public as well as private stakeholders would meet the requirement of today and tomorrow. But any alterations or improvements must start from the present state of things. So, this study looks at the different levels and various instruments dealing with traditional standards of investment and investor protection, e.g. BITs und TIPs, and at the activities of global, regional and sub-regional organizations (in particular EU and OHADA). Moreover, new developments at global and regional levels are discussed including trends showing a somewhat specific African approach to investment issues (“Africanization”). Finally, a very important topic, i.e. the relation between investment protection and human rights (of investors and of other people negatively affected by relevant activities), is described and assessed in more detail. A second part of the analysis will turn to elaborating on dispute settlement and enforcement issues since till today, there seems to be a sharp distinction between Investor-State- Dispute Settlement (ISDS) by way of mediation, conciliation and arbitration on the one hand and judicial redress by national courts (of home, host or third States) on the other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可持续的非洲投资国际法律框架
非洲可持续发展的未来及其不断增长的人口将取决于投资,这些投资可能主要来自有利的投资气候(或生态系统)所吸引的国外。与投资有关的和具体投资措施的实际(“旧”)国际法律框架很难在所有重要的公共和私人利益攸关方的利益之间建立适当的平衡,它是否能满足今天和明天的要求,这一点相当值得怀疑。但是,任何改变或改进都必须从事物的现状出发。因此,本研究着眼于处理传统投资和投资者保护标准的不同层次和各种工具,例如双边投资协定和投资促进投资协定,以及全球、区域和次区域组织(特别是欧盟和欧洲投资促进协定)的活动。此外,还讨论了全球和区域两级的新发展,包括显示非洲对投资问题采取某种具体办法的趋势(“非洲化”)。最后,更详细地描述和评估了一个非常重要的主题,即投资保护与人权(投资者和其他受相关活动负面影响的人的人权)之间的关系。分析的第二部分将转向阐述争端解决和执行问题,因为直到今天,投资者-国家争端解决(ISDS)一方面是通过调解、和解和仲裁,另一方面是由国家法院(母国、东道国或第三国)进行司法补救,两者之间似乎存在着明显的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydrocarbon Governance and Environmental Protection in the Democratic Republic of Congo Commission Nationale des Terres Biens et Cour Spéciale des Terres et autres Biens du Burundi : un Etat sinistré ou une compétence au fondement légal contestable? Les implications du principe de la souveraineté permanente de l’Etat sur les ressources naturelles sous l’empire de la Constitution du 18 février 2006 en République Démocratique du Congo Zukunftsfähiger internationaler Rechtsrahmen für Investitionen in Afrika Impressum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1