Pub Date : 2020-10-11DOI: 10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-103
Ursil Lelo Di Makungu, Blaise Iyamba Valentin, Augustin Bedidjo Ular, Daddy Bogole Bolimia, Juvénal Madigo Ntekenge, Richard Mandandi Akemane, Martin Amisa Zogi, Nadyne-Clémence Chalachala, Didier Okoto Lofongola, Ibrahim Tshimpanga
The Congolese hydrocarbons sector is one of the key areas of the national economy and constitutes one of the main resources for financing the state budget. However, the uncontrolled exploitation of hydrocarbons can have consequences on the environment as a whole, which is a natural resource essential to human life and to terrestrial and marine biodiversity. To this end, the first principle of the Stockholm Declaration adopted by the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment states that “Man has a fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being. He has a solemn duty to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations”. From the above, the protection of the environment is part of the international commitments of States to promote, in particular, sustainable development. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), on the other hand, the lack of an adequate policy on hydrocarbon exploitation and environmental protection has enormous repercussions and unfortunate consequences on the entire Congolese population despite the absolute poverty that the latter is already experiencing. This paper awaits the implementation of adequate proposals to enable policy makers to know where to start in order to ensure sound hydrocarbon governance and sustainable environmental protection in the DRC. It is also a question of demonstrating that sound governance of hydrocarbons and environmental protection requires, in particular, the participation and efforts of everyone: first of all a political will, then a strong involvement of the public authorities, of the companies which invest in the hydrocarbons sector, and a change in the mentalities of the citizens for the integral and sustainable development of the DRC in line with its hydrocarbon potential.
{"title":"Hydrocarbon Governance and Environmental Protection in the Democratic Republic of Congo","authors":"Ursil Lelo Di Makungu, Blaise Iyamba Valentin, Augustin Bedidjo Ular, Daddy Bogole Bolimia, Juvénal Madigo Ntekenge, Richard Mandandi Akemane, Martin Amisa Zogi, Nadyne-Clémence Chalachala, Didier Okoto Lofongola, Ibrahim Tshimpanga","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-103","url":null,"abstract":"The Congolese hydrocarbons sector is one of the key areas of the national economy and constitutes one of the main resources for financing the state budget. However, the uncontrolled exploitation of hydrocarbons can have consequences on the environment as a whole, which is a natural resource essential to human life and to terrestrial and marine biodiversity. To this end, the first principle of the Stockholm Declaration adopted by the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment states that “Man has a fundamental right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life, in an environment of a quality that permits a life of dignity and well-being. He has a solemn duty to protect and improve the environment for present and future generations”. From the above, the protection of the environment is part of the international commitments of States to promote, in particular, sustainable development. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), on the other hand, the lack of an adequate policy on hydrocarbon exploitation and environmental protection has enormous repercussions and unfortunate consequences on the entire Congolese population despite the absolute poverty that the latter is already experiencing. This paper awaits the implementation of adequate proposals to enable policy makers to know where to start in order to ensure sound hydrocarbon governance and sustainable environmental protection in the DRC. It is also a question of demonstrating that sound governance of hydrocarbons and environmental protection requires, in particular, the participation and efforts of everyone: first of all a political will, then a strong involvement of the public authorities, of the companies which invest in the hydrocarbons sector, and a change in the mentalities of the citizens for the integral and sustainable development of the DRC in line with its hydrocarbon potential.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123605871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-11DOI: 10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-80
Joseph Cihunda Hengelela, Nicole Djangi Ekila
Cet article démontre que le principe constitutionnel de la souveraineté permanente de l’Etat sur les ressources naturelles a été inscrit dans le système juridique congolais comme un antidote au modèle économique hérité de la colonisation. Les auteurs soutiennent qu’au regard de sa portée, il peut offrir une protection efficace aux ressources naturelles en République Démocratique du Congo à condition que certains préalables soient remplis. Il s’agit notamment de l’effectivité de l’application des lois, de l’efficacité du contrôle des activités d’exploitations des ressources naturelles, de la transparence dans la collecte et la redistribution équitable des revenus des industries extractives ainsi que de l’exercice du droit à l’indemnisation en cas de spoliation.
{"title":"Les implications du principe de la souveraineté permanente de l’Etat sur les ressources naturelles sous l’empire de la Constitution du 18 février 2006 en République Démocratique du Congo","authors":"Joseph Cihunda Hengelela, Nicole Djangi Ekila","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-80","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-80","url":null,"abstract":"Cet article démontre que le principe constitutionnel de la souveraineté permanente de l’Etat sur les ressources naturelles a été inscrit dans le système juridique congolais comme un antidote au modèle économique hérité de la colonisation. Les auteurs soutiennent qu’au regard de sa portée, il peut offrir une protection efficace aux ressources naturelles en République Démocratique du Congo à condition que certains préalables soient remplis. Il s’agit notamment de l’effectivité de l’application des lois, de l’efficacité du contrôle des activités d’exploitations des ressources naturelles, de la transparence dans la collecte et la redistribution équitable des revenus des industries extractives ainsi que de l’exercice du droit à l’indemnisation en cas de spoliation.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125622613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-11DOI: 10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-3
L. Gramlich
The future of sustainable development in Africa and for its growing population will depend on investments which might come mostly from abroad attracted by a favourable investment climate (or ecosystem). It is rather doubtful that the actual („old“) international legal framework for investment-related and investment-specific measures which does hardly create an adequate balance between the interests of all important public as well as private stakeholders would meet the requirement of today and tomorrow. But any alterations or improvements must start from the present state of things. So, this study looks at the different levels and various instruments dealing with traditional standards of investment and investor protection, e.g. BITs und TIPs, and at the activities of global, regional and sub-regional organizations (in particular EU and OHADA). Moreover, new developments at global and regional levels are discussed including trends showing a somewhat specific African approach to investment issues (“Africanization”). Finally, a very important topic, i.e. the relation between investment protection and human rights (of investors and of other people negatively affected by relevant activities), is described and assessed in more detail. A second part of the analysis will turn to elaborating on dispute settlement and enforcement issues since till today, there seems to be a sharp distinction between Investor-State- Dispute Settlement (ISDS) by way of mediation, conciliation and arbitration on the one hand and judicial redress by national courts (of home, host or third States) on the other.
{"title":"Zukunftsfähiger internationaler Rechtsrahmen für Investitionen in Afrika","authors":"L. Gramlich","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-3","url":null,"abstract":"The future of sustainable development in Africa and for its growing population will depend on investments which might come mostly from abroad attracted by a favourable investment climate (or ecosystem). It is rather doubtful that the actual („old“) international legal framework for investment-related and investment-specific measures which does hardly create an adequate balance between the interests of all important public as well as private stakeholders would meet the requirement of today and tomorrow. But any alterations or improvements must start from the present state of things. So, this study looks at the different levels and various instruments dealing with traditional standards of investment and investor protection, e.g. BITs und TIPs, and at the activities of global, regional and sub-regional organizations (in particular EU and OHADA). Moreover, new developments at global and regional levels are discussed including trends showing a somewhat specific African approach to investment issues (“Africanization”). Finally, a very important topic, i.e. the relation between investment protection and human rights (of investors and of other people negatively affected by relevant activities), is described and assessed in more detail. A second part of the analysis will turn to elaborating on dispute settlement and enforcement issues since till today, there seems to be a sharp distinction between Investor-State- Dispute Settlement (ISDS) by way of mediation, conciliation and arbitration on the one hand and judicial redress by national courts (of home, host or third States) on the other.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"14 2 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131133672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-11DOI: 10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-56
A. Niyonkuru
This paper discusses the jurisdiction of Burundi’s Commission Nationale des Terres et autres Biens (National Commission on Land and other Assets) and of the Cour Spéciale des Terres et autres Biens (Special Court on Land and other Assets) where the State of Burundi, directly or indirectly, is involved. Considering that the double mechanism (i.e. the National Commission on Land and other Assets and the Special Court on Land and other Assets) is meant to deal with disputes opposing either the sinistrés or the sinistrés to third parties, public or private services, the paper particularly questions the jurisdiction rationae personae of the abovementioned mechanism and the receivability of some of the cases. For the purposes of Burundi’s law on the CNTB promulgated in December 2013, the term “sinistré” (literally “disaster victim”) “refers to the individual or legal person, among others the association or [the] company under private law, the person repatriated, displaced, regrouped or dispersed, widow, orphan, as well as any other person despoiled of his/her goods as result of the tragic events that occurred in (Burundi) since [its] independence” (see art.2, below). Compared to its predecessor, the 2019 Law on the National Commission on Land and other Assets is somewhat restrictive. For the persons listed above to be “sinistrés”, the condition is that they could not make their claims or could not obtain an appropriate follow-up to their request as a result of the socio-political context (see art. 2 in fine). Basically, this paper suggests the lack of jurisdiction of both the Commission and the Court where they did not conclude that one of the parties to the dispute was sinistré in accordance to the definition of this term in each relevant law governing Burundi’s Commission on Land and other Assets. The paper further argues that, unless the author of a request before the Commission claims that he/she is a sinistré, his/her case should be declared non-receivable. All these issues are addressed in the light of three cases among those which received significant publicity in media, namely, the so-called RUGOFARM, RUZIZI and KIGERI cases.
本文讨论布隆迪国家土地和其他资产委员会的管辖权，以及布隆迪国直接或间接涉及的土地和其他资产特别法庭的管辖权。考虑到双重机制(即国家土地和其他资产委员会和土地和其他资产特别法庭)旨在处理反对sinistracys或反对sinistracys与第三方、公共或私人服务机构之间的纠纷，本文特别质疑上述机制的属人管辖权和某些案件的可接受性。就2013年12月颁布的布隆迪国家灾害受害者法而言，"灾难受害者"(字面意思为"灾难受害者")一词"是指个人或法人，包括私法下的协会或公司，被遣返、流离失所、重新集结或分散的人，寡妇、孤儿，以及因(布隆迪)独立以来发生的悲惨事件而被剥夺财产的任何其他人"(见第2条)。2、下面)。与前一部相比，2019年的《国家土地和其他资产委员会法》有所限制。上述被列为“邪恶的人”的条件是，由于社会政治背景，他们无法提出要求或无法对其要求采取适当的后续行动(见第2条)。2 . in fine)。基本上，这份文件表明委员会和法院都缺乏管辖权，它们没有得出结论，认为争端的一方根据布隆迪土地和其他资产委员会的每一项有关法律对这一术语的定义是遵纪守法的。该文件进一步争辩说，除非向委员会提出请求的发件人声称他/她是一名被告，否则应宣布他/她的案件不可受理。所有这些问题都是根据媒体大肆宣传的三个案件，即所谓的RUGOFARM、RUZIZI和KIGERI案件来讨论的。
{"title":"Commission Nationale des Terres Biens et Cour Spéciale des Terres et autres Biens du Burundi : un Etat sinistré ou une compétence au fondement légal contestable?","authors":"A. Niyonkuru","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-56","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2020-1-56","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the jurisdiction of Burundi’s Commission Nationale des Terres et autres Biens (National Commission on Land and other Assets) and of the Cour Spéciale des Terres et autres Biens (Special Court on Land and other Assets) where the State of Burundi, directly or indirectly, is involved. Considering that the double mechanism (i.e. the National Commission on Land and other Assets and the Special Court on Land and other Assets) is meant to deal with disputes opposing either the sinistrés or the sinistrés to third parties, public or private services, the paper particularly questions the jurisdiction rationae personae of the abovementioned mechanism and the receivability of some of the cases. For the purposes of Burundi’s law on the CNTB promulgated in December 2013, the term “sinistré” (literally “disaster victim”) “refers to the individual or legal person, among others the association or [the] company under private law, the person repatriated, displaced, regrouped or dispersed, widow, orphan, as well as any other person despoiled of his/her goods as result of the tragic events that occurred in (Burundi) since [its] independence” (see art.2, below). Compared to its predecessor, the 2019 Law on the National Commission on Land and other Assets is somewhat restrictive. For the persons listed above to be “sinistrés”, the condition is that they could not make their claims or could not obtain an appropriate follow-up to their request as a result of the socio-political context (see art. 2 in fine). Basically, this paper suggests the lack of jurisdiction of both the Commission and the Court where they did not conclude that one of the parties to the dispute was sinistré in accordance to the definition of this term in each relevant law governing Burundi’s Commission on Land and other Assets. The paper further argues that, unless the author of a request before the Commission claims that he/she is a sinistré, his/her case should be declared non-receivable. All these issues are addressed in the light of three cases among those which received significant publicity in media, namely, the so-called RUGOFARM, RUZIZI and KIGERI cases.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125276021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Impressum","authors":"","doi":"10.9785/ubg-2018-111110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.9785/ubg-2018-111110","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"180 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134506170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2363-6270-2019-1-120
V. Alexander, Silke Benner, Eike Fesefeldt, E. Oltmanns, Melanie Rischke
{"title":"Exchange Program between Judges / Prosecutors from Germany and Tanzania","authors":"V. Alexander, Silke Benner, Eike Fesefeldt, E. Oltmanns, Melanie Rischke","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2019-1-120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2019-1-120","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115621129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ce travail analyse les conflits des droits de propriété entre l’Etat congolais et les communautés locales autour des ressources naturelles du Parc des Virunga. Il a pour finalité de proposer les pistes des solutions efficaces face à la problématique liée notamment, à l’antériorité des droits de propriété des communautés locales sur les territoires des Virunga ainsi qu’à la disqualification des droits fonciers traditionnels par la loi dite Foncière en République Démocratique du Congo (RDC). L’étude note que l’Etat n’est pas la seule autorité de création des droits, les communautés peuvent les créer aussi. Et, lorsque l’autorité étatique veut ignorer les règles communautaires au nom de la souveraineté sur ses ressources, ces dernières peuvent se défendre du principe de l’autodétermination économique, sociale ou culturelle. Si l’exploitation des ressources naturelles du Parc des Virunga peut servir à redistribuer d’une manière équitable les richesses nationales et s’il n’y a rien d’importance de les réserver, l’Etat peut procéder à l’exploitation des ressources naturelles de ce dernier tout en garantissant les droits et intérêts des communautés locales pour privilégier le climat social.
{"title":"Conflits des droits de propriété entre l’Etat congolais et les communautés locales autour des ressources naturelles du Parc National des Virunga en République Démocratique du Congo","authors":"B. Valentin, Merveille Bobina Mposo, Augustin Bedidjo Ular, Toufin Djamba Lundula, Jadis Senga Yenga, Jean-Aubin Akamba Lisoba, Bitota Kaza-di, Louange Kavugho Muvughe","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2023-1-110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2023-1-110","url":null,"abstract":"Ce travail analyse les conflits des droits de propriété entre l’Etat congolais et les communautés locales autour des ressources naturelles du Parc des Virunga. Il a pour finalité de proposer les pistes des solutions efficaces face à la problématique liée notamment, à l’antériorité des droits de propriété des communautés locales sur les territoires des Virunga ainsi qu’à la disqualification des droits fonciers traditionnels par la loi dite Foncière en République Démocratique du Congo (RDC). L’étude note que l’Etat n’est pas la seule autorité de création des droits, les communautés peuvent les créer aussi. Et, lorsque l’autorité étatique veut ignorer les règles communautaires au nom de la souveraineté sur ses ressources, ces dernières peuvent se défendre du principe de l’autodétermination économique, sociale ou culturelle. Si l’exploitation des ressources naturelles du Parc des Virunga peut servir à redistribuer d’une manière équitable les richesses nationales et s’il n’y a rien d’importance de les réserver, l’Etat peut procéder à l’exploitation des ressources naturelles de ce dernier tout en garantissant les droits et intérêts des communautés locales pour privilégier le climat social.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122379067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-264
H. Sippel
Bedauerliche Ereignisse führten in diesem Jahr zur erheblichen Beeinträchtigung unseres Alltags. Zur weiterhin bestehenden Pandemielage gesellte sich in den letzten Winterwochen das Kriegsgeschehen in der Ukraine mit drastischen Folgen auch für unser Leben in Deutschland, insbesondere die damit einhergehende Energiekrise. Die infolge dieser ungünstigen Gemengelage auftretenden Unwägbarkeiten verunmöglichten leider eine seriöse Planung der für Herbst 2022 intendierten Jahrestagung. Eine spätestens im Sommer vorzunehmende Verpflichtung möglicher Vortragender und eine ernstzunehmende Vorbereitung der aufwändigen Tagung mit unserem jeweiligen Kooperationspartner kann nicht ernsthaft erfolgen, wenn nicht feststeht, ob die Veranstaltung im Herbst überhaupt stattfinden kann, ob zu dieser Zeit für uns auch beheizte Räumlichkeiten am Tagungsort zur Verfügung stehen, und ob insbesondere eine ausreichende Zahl von Besucherinnen und Besuchern das Konferenzangebot anzunehmen bereit ist, die den erheblichen Einsatz personeller und materieller Ressourcen rechtfertigen könnte. Nach Einschätzung der Lage und Abwägung der Interessen hat der Vorstand der Gesellschaft für afrikanisches Recht e.V. daher beschlossen, im laufenden Jahr keine Konferenz auszurichten, die nächste Jahrestagung dafür aber nicht erst im Herbst, sondern bereits im Frühjahr 2023 zu veranstalten.
{"title":"Mitteilungen aus der Gesellschaft für afrikanisches Recht (2022)","authors":"H. Sippel","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2022-2-264","url":null,"abstract":"Bedauerliche Ereignisse führten in diesem Jahr zur erheblichen Beeinträchtigung unseres Alltags. Zur weiterhin bestehenden Pandemielage gesellte sich in den letzten Winterwochen das Kriegsgeschehen in der Ukraine mit drastischen Folgen auch für unser Leben in Deutschland, insbesondere die damit einhergehende Energiekrise. Die infolge dieser ungünstigen Gemengelage auftretenden Unwägbarkeiten verunmöglichten leider eine seriöse Planung der für Herbst 2022 intendierten Jahrestagung. Eine spätestens im Sommer vorzunehmende Verpflichtung möglicher Vortragender und eine ernstzunehmende Vorbereitung der aufwändigen Tagung mit unserem jeweiligen Kooperationspartner kann nicht ernsthaft erfolgen, wenn nicht feststeht, ob die Veranstaltung im Herbst überhaupt stattfinden kann, ob zu dieser Zeit für uns auch beheizte Räumlichkeiten am Tagungsort zur Verfügung stehen, und ob insbesondere eine ausreichende Zahl von Besucherinnen und Besuchern das Konferenzangebot anzunehmen bereit ist, die den erheblichen Einsatz personeller und materieller Ressourcen rechtfertigen könnte. Nach Einschätzung der Lage und Abwägung der Interessen hat der Vorstand der Gesellschaft für afrikanisches Recht e.V. daher beschlossen, im laufenden Jahr keine Konferenz auszurichten, die nächste Jahrestagung dafür aber nicht erst im Herbst, sondern bereits im Frühjahr 2023 zu veranstalten.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124078426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2363-6270-2021-2-258
H. Sippel
Trotz der im Kalenderjahr 2021 bestehenden Pandemielage und der damit einhergehenden Einschränkungen in vielen Lebensbereichen konnte die Gesellschaft für afrikanisches Recht e.V. ihren Aufgaben nachkommen und neben der Herausgabe der Zeitschrift sowie der Bereitstellung der Internetseite nach der vorjährigen Zwangspause insbesondere wieder die Jahreskonferenz veranstalten.
{"title":"Mitteilungen aus der Gesellschaft für afrikanisches Recht (2021)","authors":"H. Sippel","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2021-2-258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2021-2-258","url":null,"abstract":"Trotz der im Kalenderjahr 2021 bestehenden Pandemielage und der damit einhergehenden Einschränkungen in vielen Lebensbereichen konnte die Gesellschaft für afrikanisches Recht e.V. ihren Aufgaben nachkommen und neben der Herausgabe der Zeitschrift sowie der Bereitstellung der Internetseite nach der vorjährigen Zwangspause insbesondere wieder die Jahreskonferenz veranstalten.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133858947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1900-01-01DOI: 10.5771/2363-6270-2021-2-183
Rodolphe Houédoté
L’article 457 du Code pénal interdit sans distinction le don et la vente d’organes humains. En effet, contrairement aux sociétés occidentales, au Bénin, le trafic et le don d’organes sont perçus comme une forme de commerce entre les êtres humains. On note cependant un décalage entre la situation juridique posée à l’article 457 du Code pénal et la réalité car dans les centres hospitaliers les listes d’attente s’allongent et nombreux sont les malades qui souffrent et meurent faute d’un organe susceptible de les sauver. La répression du trafic et du don d’organes prévue par le Code pénal est certes conforme au droit international, à la constitution, à l’anthropologie et à la sociologie béninoise mais n’est pas sans poser des problèmes dans la mise en œuvre de l’article 8 de la constitution. Elle révèle également des incohérences dans l’arsenal juridique et des obstacles à l’efficacité de la répression du trafic et du don d’organe.
{"title":"La répression du trafic et du don d’organes au Bénin de lege lata et de lege ferenda","authors":"Rodolphe Houédoté","doi":"10.5771/2363-6270-2021-2-183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2021-2-183","url":null,"abstract":"L’article 457 du Code pénal interdit sans distinction le don et la vente d’organes humains. En effet, contrairement aux sociétés occidentales, au Bénin, le trafic et le don d’organes sont perçus comme une forme de commerce entre les êtres humains. On note cependant un décalage entre la situation juridique posée à l’article 457 du Code pénal et la réalité car dans les centres hospitaliers les listes d’attente s’allongent et nombreux sont les malades qui souffrent et meurent faute d’un organe susceptible de les sauver. La répression du trafic et du don d’organes prévue par le Code pénal est certes conforme au droit international, à la constitution, à l’anthropologie et à la sociologie béninoise mais n’est pas sans poser des problèmes dans la mise en œuvre de l’article 8 de la constitution. Elle révèle également des incohérences dans l’arsenal juridique et des obstacles à l’efficacité de la répression du trafic et du don d’organe.","PeriodicalId":121115,"journal":{"name":"Recht in Afrika","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114386310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：