Anti-COVID = Anti-science? How protesters against COVID-19 measures appropriate science to navigate the information environment

Anna Berg
{"title":"Anti-COVID = Anti-science? How protesters against COVID-19 measures appropriate science to navigate the information environment","authors":"Anna Berg","doi":"10.1177/14614448231189262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opponents of COVID-19 measures invoke science in curious ways: they collect data, cite scientific studies, and even conduct their own research projects. Previous research has explained these scientific appropriations as the product of motivated reasoning, the result of widespread disinformation, or a populist strategy. This study provides a further explanation by focusing on these scientific projects. Drawing from repeated interviews with a select group of 36 anti-lockdown protesters in Germany, I find that my interviewees draw on scientific repertoires in order to overcome information insecurities triggered by their discovery of online countermedia. Although the results of their scientific efforts often remain inconclusive, through the process of doing research, protesters achieve a reorientation in the information environment and begin to rely on countermedia as a source of information and political opinion. Based on these findings, I argue that protesters refer to the sciences as a conversion technique.","PeriodicalId":443328,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231189262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opponents of COVID-19 measures invoke science in curious ways: they collect data, cite scientific studies, and even conduct their own research projects. Previous research has explained these scientific appropriations as the product of motivated reasoning, the result of widespread disinformation, or a populist strategy. This study provides a further explanation by focusing on these scientific projects. Drawing from repeated interviews with a select group of 36 anti-lockdown protesters in Germany, I find that my interviewees draw on scientific repertoires in order to overcome information insecurities triggered by their discovery of online countermedia. Although the results of their scientific efforts often remain inconclusive, through the process of doing research, protesters achieve a reorientation in the information environment and begin to rely on countermedia as a source of information and political opinion. Based on these findings, I argue that protesters refer to the sciences as a conversion technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗疫=反科学?反对COVID-19的抗议者如何衡量适当的科学来驾驭信息环境
COVID-19措施的反对者以奇怪的方式引用科学:他们收集数据,引用科学研究,甚至开展自己的研究项目。先前的研究将这些科学挪用解释为动机推理的产物,广泛的虚假信息的结果,或者是一种民粹主义策略。本研究通过关注这些科学项目提供了进一步的解释。根据对德国36名反封锁抗议者的反复采访,我发现我的受访者利用科学手段来克服因发现网络反媒体而引发的信息不安全感。虽然他们的科学努力的结果往往是不确定的,通过做研究的过程,抗议者实现了在信息环境中的重新定位,并开始依赖反媒体作为信息和政治意见的来源。基于这些发现,我认为抗议者将科学视为一种转化技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Performing lowbrowness: How Chinese queer people negotiate visibility on short-video platforms When content moderation is not about content: How Chinese social media platforms moderate content and why it matters “Our advice is to break up”: Douban’s intimate public and the rise of girlfriend culture Unmasking coordinated hate: Analysing hate speech on Spanish digital news media Human–AI communication in initial encounters: How AI agency affects trust, liking, and chat quality evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1