Individual Deep Fake Recognition Skills are Affected by Viewer's Political Orientation, Agreement with Content and Device Used

Interacción Pub Date : 2021-12-30 DOI:10.31234/osf.io/hwujb
Stefan Sütterlin, Torvald F. Ask, Sophia Mägerle, Sandra Glöckler, Leandra Wolf, Julian Schray, Alaya Chandi, Teodora Bursac, Ali Khodabakhsh, Benjamin J. Knox, Matthew Canham, R. Lugo
{"title":"Individual Deep Fake Recognition Skills are Affected by Viewer's Political Orientation, Agreement with Content and Device Used","authors":"Stefan Sütterlin, Torvald F. Ask, Sophia Mägerle, Sandra Glöckler, Leandra Wolf, Julian Schray, Alaya Chandi, Teodora Bursac, Ali Khodabakhsh, Benjamin J. Knox, Matthew Canham, R. Lugo","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/hwujb","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AI-generated “deep fakes” are becoming increasingly professional and can be expected to become an essential tool for cybercriminals conducting targeted and tailored social engineering attacks, as well as for others aiming for influencing public opinion in a more general sense. While the technological arms race is resulting in increasingly efficient forensic detection tools, these are unlikely to be in place and applied by common users on an everyday basis any time soon, especially if social engineering attacks are camouflaged as unsuspicious conversations. To date, most cybercriminals do not yet have the necessary resources, competencies or the required raw material featuring the target to produce perfect impersonifications. To raise awareness and efficiently train individuals in recognizing the most widespread deep fakes, the understanding of what may cause individual differences in the ability to recognize them can be central. Previous research suggested a close relationship between political attitudes and top-down perceptual and subsequent cognitive processing styles. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of political attitudes and agreement with the political message content on the individual’s deep fake recognition skills.In this study, 163 adults (72 females = 44.2%) judged a series of video clips with politicians’ statements across the political spectrum regarding their authenticity and their agreement with the message that was transported. Half of the presented videos were fabricated via lip-sync technology. In addition to the particular agreement to each statement made, more global political attitudes towards social and economic topics were assessed via the Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS).Data analysis revealed robust negative associations between participants’ general and in particular social conservatism and their ability to recognize fabricated videos. This effect was pronounced where there was a specific agreement with the message content. Deep fakes watched on mobile phones and tablets were considerably less likely to be recognized as such compared to when watched on stationary computers.To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate and establish the association between political attitudes and interindividual differences in deep fake recognition. The study further supports very recently published research suggesting relationships between conservatism and perceived credibility of conspiracy theories and fake news in general. Implications for further research on psychological mechanisms underlying this effect are discussed.","PeriodicalId":129626,"journal":{"name":"Interacción","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interacción","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hwujb","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AI-generated “deep fakes” are becoming increasingly professional and can be expected to become an essential tool for cybercriminals conducting targeted and tailored social engineering attacks, as well as for others aiming for influencing public opinion in a more general sense. While the technological arms race is resulting in increasingly efficient forensic detection tools, these are unlikely to be in place and applied by common users on an everyday basis any time soon, especially if social engineering attacks are camouflaged as unsuspicious conversations. To date, most cybercriminals do not yet have the necessary resources, competencies or the required raw material featuring the target to produce perfect impersonifications. To raise awareness and efficiently train individuals in recognizing the most widespread deep fakes, the understanding of what may cause individual differences in the ability to recognize them can be central. Previous research suggested a close relationship between political attitudes and top-down perceptual and subsequent cognitive processing styles. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of political attitudes and agreement with the political message content on the individual’s deep fake recognition skills.In this study, 163 adults (72 females = 44.2%) judged a series of video clips with politicians’ statements across the political spectrum regarding their authenticity and their agreement with the message that was transported. Half of the presented videos were fabricated via lip-sync technology. In addition to the particular agreement to each statement made, more global political attitudes towards social and economic topics were assessed via the Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS).Data analysis revealed robust negative associations between participants’ general and in particular social conservatism and their ability to recognize fabricated videos. This effect was pronounced where there was a specific agreement with the message content. Deep fakes watched on mobile phones and tablets were considerably less likely to be recognized as such compared to when watched on stationary computers.To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate and establish the association between political attitudes and interindividual differences in deep fake recognition. The study further supports very recently published research suggesting relationships between conservatism and perceived credibility of conspiracy theories and fake news in general. Implications for further research on psychological mechanisms underlying this effect are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人的深度假识别能力受观众的政治倾向、对内容的认同和使用的设备的影响
人工智能生成的“深度造假”正变得越来越专业,有望成为网络犯罪分子进行有针对性和量身定制的社会工程攻击的重要工具,以及其他旨在影响公众舆论的工具。虽然技术军备竞赛导致越来越高效的取证检测工具,但这些工具不太可能在短期内被普通用户在日常基础上应用,特别是如果社会工程攻击伪装成不可疑的对话。到目前为止,大多数网络犯罪分子还没有必要的资源、能力或所需的原材料来制造完美的冒充目标。为了提高认识并有效地训练个人识别最普遍的深度伪造,了解可能导致个人识别能力差异的原因是至关重要的。先前的研究表明,政治态度与自上而下的感知和随后的认知加工风格之间存在密切关系。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨政治态度和对政治信息内容的认同对个人深度虚假识别技能的影响。在这项研究中,163名成年人(72名女性= 44.2%)对一系列视频片段进行了评判,这些视频片段中包含了不同政治领域的政治家的言论,包括真实性和对所传达信息的认同程度。一半的视频是通过假唱技术制作的。除了对每项声明的特定同意外,还通过社会和经济保守主义量表(SECS)评估了对社会和经济主题的更多全球政治态度。数据分析显示,参与者的社会保守主义与他们识别伪造视频的能力之间存在强烈的负相关。当与消息内容有特定的一致时,这种效果就会明显。与在固定电脑上观看相比,在手机和平板电脑上观看的深度假照片被识别出来的可能性要小得多。据我们所知,这项研究是第一个调查和建立政治态度与深度虚假识别中个体间差异之间关系的研究。这项研究进一步支持了最近发表的一项研究,即保守主义与阴谋论和假新闻的可信度之间存在关系。讨论了进一步研究这种效应背后的心理机制的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Thousand Faces of Explainable AI Along the Machine Learning Life Cycle: Industrial Reality and Current State of Research Tell Me, What Are You Most Afraid Of? Exploring the Effects of Agent Representation on Information Disclosure in Human-Chatbot Interaction Modular 3D Interface Design for Accessible VR Applications A new perspective on the prediction of the innovation performance: A data driven methodology to identify innovation indicators through a comparative study of Boston's neighborhoods Two Heads are Better than One: A Bio-inspired Method for Improving Classification on EEG-ET Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1