P. Teja, Ankit Uppal, S. Mittal, Aashee Verma, Gunjan Aneja, Mahak Gagain
{"title":"Evaluation of vertical mandibular asymmetry in different malocclusions- A panoramic study","authors":"P. Teja, Ankit Uppal, S. Mittal, Aashee Verma, Gunjan Aneja, Mahak Gagain","doi":"10.18231/j.ijmi.2023.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare mandibular asymmetry in different malocclusions, including Angle's Class I malocclusion, Angle's Class II div 1 malocclusion, Angle's Class II div 2 malocclusion, Angle's Class II subdivision and Unilateral posterior cross bite.: A total number of 150 subjects with the age range of 18-24 yrs with no signs and symptoms were selected for the study (n=30). The condylar asymmetry index (CAI), ramal asymmetry Index (RAI) and Condylar and Ranal Asymmetry Index (CRAI) for each patient was measured using panoramic radiograph. The results were analyzes using Kappa test, Dahlberg’s formula and Tukey HSD Post Hoc test. : Group IV (Angle's Class II subdivision malocclusion) had the maximum Condylar Asymmetry Index (13.07 ±12.43mm) whereas Group II (Angle's Class II div 1 malocclusion) had the minimum Condylar Asymmetry Index (7.89 ±8.71mm). Group III (Angle's Class II div 2 malocclusion) had the maximum Ramus Asymmetry Index (3.84 ± 2.54%) whereas Group II (Angle's Class II div 1 malocclusion) had the minimum Ramus Asymmetry Index (2.82 ± 1.94%). Condylar and Ramus Asymmetry Index was seen in Group IV (Angle's Class II subdivision malocclusion) (3.61 ± 2.43 mm) whereas minimum condylar and ramus asymmetry index was seen in Group V (Unilateral posterior cross bite) (2.42 ± 2.08 mm). However, no statistically significant differences were found.: No statistically significant difference was found in vertical mandibular asymmetry indices when compared in different malocclusions. No gender related statistically significant difference was found in all groups.","PeriodicalId":282949,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Maxillofacial Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmi.2023.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare mandibular asymmetry in different malocclusions, including Angle's Class I malocclusion, Angle's Class II div 1 malocclusion, Angle's Class II div 2 malocclusion, Angle's Class II subdivision and Unilateral posterior cross bite.: A total number of 150 subjects with the age range of 18-24 yrs with no signs and symptoms were selected for the study (n=30). The condylar asymmetry index (CAI), ramal asymmetry Index (RAI) and Condylar and Ranal Asymmetry Index (CRAI) for each patient was measured using panoramic radiograph. The results were analyzes using Kappa test, Dahlberg’s formula and Tukey HSD Post Hoc test. : Group IV (Angle's Class II subdivision malocclusion) had the maximum Condylar Asymmetry Index (13.07 ±12.43mm) whereas Group II (Angle's Class II div 1 malocclusion) had the minimum Condylar Asymmetry Index (7.89 ±8.71mm). Group III (Angle's Class II div 2 malocclusion) had the maximum Ramus Asymmetry Index (3.84 ± 2.54%) whereas Group II (Angle's Class II div 1 malocclusion) had the minimum Ramus Asymmetry Index (2.82 ± 1.94%). Condylar and Ramus Asymmetry Index was seen in Group IV (Angle's Class II subdivision malocclusion) (3.61 ± 2.43 mm) whereas minimum condylar and ramus asymmetry index was seen in Group V (Unilateral posterior cross bite) (2.42 ± 2.08 mm). However, no statistically significant differences were found.: No statistically significant difference was found in vertical mandibular asymmetry indices when compared in different malocclusions. No gender related statistically significant difference was found in all groups.
本研究的目的是比较不同错颌的下颌不对称性,包括Angle的I类错颌、Angle的II类1类错颌、Angle的II类2类错颌、Angle的II类细分和单侧后交叉咬合。:选取年龄在18-24岁,无症状体征的受试者150例(n=30)。采用全景x线片测量每位患者的髁突不对称指数(CAI)、髁突不对称指数(RAI)和髁突与Ranal不对称指数(CRAI)。采用Kappa检验、Dahlberg公式和Tukey HSD事后检验对结果进行分析。:第IV组(Angle’s Class II细分错牙合)髁突不对称指数最大(13.07±12.43mm),第II组(Angle’s Class II div 1错牙合)髁突不对称指数最小(7.89±8.71mm)。III组(Angle的II类div 2错颌)的支不对称指数最高(3.84±2.54%),II组(Angle的II类div 1错颌)的支不对称指数最低(2.82±1.94%)。IV组(Angle’s Class II细分错颌)髁支不对称指数为3.61±2.43 mm, V组(单侧后交叉咬合)髁支不对称指数最小(2.42±2.08 mm)。然而,没有发现统计学上的显著差异。不同错颌的下颌垂直不对称指数比较,差异无统计学意义。各组间无性别相关的统计学差异。