Weber as a Reader of Rudolph Sohm, and the Incomplete Concept of ‘Office Charisma'

J. Heurtin
{"title":"Weber as a Reader of Rudolph Sohm, and the Incomplete Concept of ‘Office Charisma'","authors":"J. Heurtin","doi":"10.1353/max.2019.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The purpose of this article is to revisit the concept of ‘office charisma', as Max Weber introduced it in his Sociology of Religions. Weber's conceptualization of it seems unfinished, and used only to characterize a form of degeneration of personal charisma, and more precisely, as the form that the charisma takes when it becomes quotidian. The discussion of this hypothesis requires a re-examination of the sources used by Weber, namely Rudoph Sohm's Kirchenrecht, published in 1892. It was from Sohm that Weber drew the opposite pair of personal charisma and office charisma. Kirchenrecht was published in a Lutheran context, and it seems that Weber, in his interpretation and secularization of the notion of charisma, remained a prisoner of Lutheran precepts; in particular, they prevented him from achieving a genuinely autonomous characterization of ‘office charisma'. But Sohm's book has also continued to stimulate reflection on the question of charisma among Catholics; it has led them, in particular, to rediscover the pneumatic dimension in their theology of the Church and ministries. The question that arises, then, is whether Catholic theology, and more precisely its ecclesiology, might allow us to think differently about charisma, especially in its relationship to the institution — so that this ecclesiology would be a possible lateral path for the sociology of charisma. How, in the light of this Catholic reflection, could an alternative concept of office charism can be reconstructed?","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Weber Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2019.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:The purpose of this article is to revisit the concept of ‘office charisma', as Max Weber introduced it in his Sociology of Religions. Weber's conceptualization of it seems unfinished, and used only to characterize a form of degeneration of personal charisma, and more precisely, as the form that the charisma takes when it becomes quotidian. The discussion of this hypothesis requires a re-examination of the sources used by Weber, namely Rudoph Sohm's Kirchenrecht, published in 1892. It was from Sohm that Weber drew the opposite pair of personal charisma and office charisma. Kirchenrecht was published in a Lutheran context, and it seems that Weber, in his interpretation and secularization of the notion of charisma, remained a prisoner of Lutheran precepts; in particular, they prevented him from achieving a genuinely autonomous characterization of ‘office charisma'. But Sohm's book has also continued to stimulate reflection on the question of charisma among Catholics; it has led them, in particular, to rediscover the pneumatic dimension in their theology of the Church and ministries. The question that arises, then, is whether Catholic theology, and more precisely its ecclesiology, might allow us to think differently about charisma, especially in its relationship to the institution — so that this ecclesiology would be a possible lateral path for the sociology of charisma. How, in the light of this Catholic reflection, could an alternative concept of office charism can be reconstructed?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为索姆读者的韦伯与“办公室魅力”的不完整概念
摘要:本文旨在重新审视韦伯在《宗教社会学》中提出的“办公室魅力”概念。韦伯对它的概念化似乎没有完成,只是用来描述个人魅力的一种退化形式,更准确地说,是当个人魅力变得司空见惯时所采取的形式。对这一假设的讨论需要重新审视韦伯所使用的资料来源,即1892年出版的鲁道夫·索姆(rudolph Sohm)的《Kirchenrecht》。正是从索姆那里,韦伯描绘了个人魅力和办公室魅力的对立面。《基兴雷希特》是在路德教背景下出版的,韦伯,在他对魅力概念的阐释和世俗化中,似乎仍然是路德教戒律的囚徒;特别是,他们阻止了他真正自主地塑造“办公室魅力”。但索姆的书也继续激发了对天主教徒魅力问题的思考;特别是,它使他们重新发现他们的教会和事工神学中的气动维度。那么问题来了,天主教神学,更确切地说是教会学,是否允许我们以不同的方式思考魅力,特别是在它与机构的关系上——这样教会学就可能成为魅力社会学的一条横向路径。在这种天主教的反思下,如何重建另一种办公室魅力的概念?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber's Idea of Modernity ed. by Robert A Yelle and Lorenz Trein (review) List of Contributors Otto Neurath's Distorted Reception of Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Methodology from the Standpoint of Experience: A Comparison of Max Weber, Heinrich Rickert and John Stuart Mill Planned Introduction to the Abriß der universalen Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte Mit- und Nachschriften 1919–1920 in the Max Weber Gesamtausgabe (Sections 1-6)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1