Should We Trust Fund Managers? A Close Look at the Canadian Mutual Fund Governance

Zhongzhi He, M. Kusý, Deepak Singh, Samir Trabelsi
{"title":"Should We Trust Fund Managers? A Close Look at the Canadian Mutual Fund Governance","authors":"Zhongzhi He, M. Kusý, Deepak Singh, Samir Trabelsi","doi":"10.1108/S1569-373220180000020005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThe Canadian mutual fund setting is unique in that two governance mechanisms – corporate and trust – coexist. This study empirically examines the impact of each mechanism on fund fees and performance. We find that corporate class funds charge higher fees but deliver superior fee-adjusted returns than trust funds. We then analyze the impact of various board characteristics on fees and performance for corporate class funds. We find that a board with smaller size, CEO duality, and a higher percentage of independent directors is more likely to charge lower fees. In addition, smaller boards are strongly associated with higher fee-adjusted performance. Our study supports agency theory over stewardship theory and provides valuable guidelines for Canadian investors and regulatory agencies.","PeriodicalId":439901,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Financial Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-373220180000020005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The Canadian mutual fund setting is unique in that two governance mechanisms – corporate and trust – coexist. This study empirically examines the impact of each mechanism on fund fees and performance. We find that corporate class funds charge higher fees but deliver superior fee-adjusted returns than trust funds. We then analyze the impact of various board characteristics on fees and performance for corporate class funds. We find that a board with smaller size, CEO duality, and a higher percentage of independent directors is more likely to charge lower fees. In addition, smaller boards are strongly associated with higher fee-adjusted performance. Our study supports agency theory over stewardship theory and provides valuable guidelines for Canadian investors and regulatory agencies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们应该信任基金经理吗?加拿大共同基金治理细看
加拿大共同基金的独特之处在于两种治理机制——公司治理机制和信托治理机制并存。本研究实证检验了各机制对基金收费和绩效的影响。我们发现,与信托基金相比,公司级基金收取更高的费用,但提供了更高的费用调整后回报。然后,我们分析了各种董事会特征对公司类基金收费和业绩的影响。我们发现,董事会规模较小、CEO双轨制和独立董事比例较高的董事会更有可能收取较低的费用。此外,较小的董事会与较高的费用调整后的业绩密切相关。我们的研究支持代理理论而不是管理理论,并为加拿大投资者和监管机构提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empirical Research in Banking and Corporate Finance Are Dividends an Outcome of or a Substitute for External Corporate Governance? International Evidence Based on Product Market Competition Reconsidering the Mandate of the Audit Committee: Evidence from Corporate Governance in Israel Board Gender Diversity and Firm Financial Performance: A Quantile Regression Analysis International Corporate Governance and Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1