Undervisning som forebygger dannelse av udemokratiske holdninger

Herner Sæverot, Gerd Grimsæth, Christine Hope
{"title":"Undervisning som forebygger dannelse av udemokratiske holdninger","authors":"Herner Sæverot, Gerd Grimsæth, Christine Hope","doi":"10.57126/noad.v6i1.6670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies conducted by the Norwegian Center for Holocaust and Minority Studies show that racism, extremism, antisemitism, exclusion etc., i.e., feelings and attitudes which are discriminatory, appear among parts of the Norwegian population. Attitudes being discriminatory are the opposite of inclusion which characterizes democracy. Can schools and education prevent such undemocratic attitudes? To address this question the paper takes its point of departure from the double purpose of education, i.e., an education which is good for the individual and an education which is good for society, democracy and the world as a whole. Furthermore, this double purpose was connected to general didactics and teaching, where the goal is to teach and educate individuals in such a manner that they will feel responsible and obligated to act for the good of society and democracy. To prevent this from being a purely theoretical research, we filmed and observed concrete teaching situations in the school, whilst we interviewed teachers in groups. Two teacher-groups in secondary school participated in our research. The research-question was: How do some teachers teach when the aim is to prevent the formation of undemocratic attitudes? We analyzed the results by way of three different models for teaching, including both direct and indirect approaches of teaching. The main conclusion is that the teachers who participated in our research combined direct and indirect approaches in their teaching; however, indirect approaches were particularly prominent in situations where the purpose was to make students responsible for society and democracy.","PeriodicalId":211767,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk Tidskrift för Allmän Didaktik","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk Tidskrift för Allmän Didaktik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57126/noad.v6i1.6670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies conducted by the Norwegian Center for Holocaust and Minority Studies show that racism, extremism, antisemitism, exclusion etc., i.e., feelings and attitudes which are discriminatory, appear among parts of the Norwegian population. Attitudes being discriminatory are the opposite of inclusion which characterizes democracy. Can schools and education prevent such undemocratic attitudes? To address this question the paper takes its point of departure from the double purpose of education, i.e., an education which is good for the individual and an education which is good for society, democracy and the world as a whole. Furthermore, this double purpose was connected to general didactics and teaching, where the goal is to teach and educate individuals in such a manner that they will feel responsible and obligated to act for the good of society and democracy. To prevent this from being a purely theoretical research, we filmed and observed concrete teaching situations in the school, whilst we interviewed teachers in groups. Two teacher-groups in secondary school participated in our research. The research-question was: How do some teachers teach when the aim is to prevent the formation of undemocratic attitudes? We analyzed the results by way of three different models for teaching, including both direct and indirect approaches of teaching. The main conclusion is that the teachers who participated in our research combined direct and indirect approaches in their teaching; however, indirect approaches were particularly prominent in situations where the purpose was to make students responsible for society and democracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威大屠杀和少数民族研究中心进行的研究表明,种族主义、极端主义、反犹太主义、排斥等,即歧视性的感情和态度,在挪威部分人口中出现。歧视的态度与民主的特点——包容是对立的。学校和教育能阻止这种不民主的态度吗?为了解决这个问题,本文从教育的双重目的出发,即对个人有益的教育和对社会、民主和整个世界有益的教育。此外,这一双重目的与一般教学和教学有关,其目标是以这样一种方式教导和教育个人,使他们感到有责任和义务为社会和民主的利益而行动。为了避免纯粹的理论研究,我们在学校拍摄和观察了具体的教学情况,同时对教师进行了分组采访。两个中学教师组参与了我们的研究。研究问题是:当一些教师的教学目的是防止不民主态度的形成时,他们是如何教学的?我们通过三种不同的教学模式对结果进行了分析,包括直接教学和间接教学。主要结论是:参与研究的教师在教学中采用了直接教学与间接教学相结合的方法;然而,在目的是使学生对社会和民主负责的情况下,间接方法尤为突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reformimplementering i förskolepraktik God udeskoleundervisning Alexander von Oettingen: Allmän didaktik – mellan normativitet och evidens. Lund: Studentlitteratur Att bilda eller bedöma? Mänskliga rättigheter som innehåll i undervisningen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1