Security Mechanisms Used in Microservices-Based Systems: A Systematic Mapping

Anelis Pereira Vale, Gastón Márquez, H. Astudillo, E. Fernández
{"title":"Security Mechanisms Used in Microservices-Based Systems: A Systematic Mapping","authors":"Anelis Pereira Vale, Gastón Márquez, H. Astudillo, E. Fernández","doi":"10.1109/CLEI47609.2019.235060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microservices is an architectural style that conceives systems as a modular, costumer, independent and scalable suite of services; it offers several advantages but its growing popularity has given rise to security challenges. Building secure systems is greatly helped by deploying existing security mechanisms, but current literature does not guide developers about which mechanisms are actually used by developers of microservicesbased systems. This article describes the design and results of a systematic mapping study to identify the security mechanisms used in microservices-based systems described in the literature. The study yielded 321 articles, of which 26 are primary studies. Key findings are that (i) the studies mention 18 security mechanisms; (ii) the most mentioned security mechanisms are authentication, authorization and credentials; and (iii) almost 2/3 of security mechanisms focus on stopping or mitigating attacks, but none on recovering from them. Additionally, it emerges that experiments and case studies are the most used empirical strategies in microservices security research. The clear identification of most-used security solutions will facilitate the reuse of existing architectural knowledge to address security problems in microservices-based systems.","PeriodicalId":216193,"journal":{"name":"2019 XLV Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 XLV Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI47609.2019.235060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Microservices is an architectural style that conceives systems as a modular, costumer, independent and scalable suite of services; it offers several advantages but its growing popularity has given rise to security challenges. Building secure systems is greatly helped by deploying existing security mechanisms, but current literature does not guide developers about which mechanisms are actually used by developers of microservicesbased systems. This article describes the design and results of a systematic mapping study to identify the security mechanisms used in microservices-based systems described in the literature. The study yielded 321 articles, of which 26 are primary studies. Key findings are that (i) the studies mention 18 security mechanisms; (ii) the most mentioned security mechanisms are authentication, authorization and credentials; and (iii) almost 2/3 of security mechanisms focus on stopping or mitigating attacks, but none on recovering from them. Additionally, it emerges that experiments and case studies are the most used empirical strategies in microservices security research. The clear identification of most-used security solutions will facilitate the reuse of existing architectural knowledge to address security problems in microservices-based systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于微服务的系统中使用的安全机制:一个系统的映射
微服务是一种架构风格,它将系统视为模块化、客户化、独立和可扩展的服务套件;它有几个优点,但它的日益普及也带来了安全挑战。部署现有的安全机制对构建安全系统有很大帮助,但是目前的文献并没有指导开发人员基于微服务的系统的开发人员实际使用哪些机制。本文描述了系统映射研究的设计和结果,以确定文献中描述的基于微服务的系统中使用的安全机制。该研究共发表了321篇文章,其中26篇是初步研究。主要发现是:(1)研究提到了18种安全机制;(ii)被提及最多的安全机制是身份验证、授权和凭证;(iii)几乎2/3的安全机制侧重于阻止或减轻攻击,但没有一个侧重于从攻击中恢复。此外,实验和案例研究是微服务安全研究中最常用的经验策略。最常用的安全解决方案的清晰标识将促进现有架构知识的重用,以解决基于微服务的系统中的安全问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Model for Detecting Conflicts and Dependencies in Non-Functional Requirements Using Scenarios and Use Cases Fusion of infrared and visible images using multiscale morphology Pentest on Internet of Things Devices Development of Emotional Intelligence in Computing Students: The “Experiencia 360°” Project Structuring a Folksonomy in a Community of Questions and Answers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1