Non-standart position of the false door in Giza tombs - a builing mistake or a least-evil solution?

Sergey V. Vetokhov
{"title":"Non-standart position of the false door in Giza tombs - a builing mistake or a least-evil solution?","authors":"Sergey V. Vetokhov","doi":"10.31857/s086919080013935-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the chapels of a number of tombs in the Giza necropolis, both rock-cut and stone (mastaba), the false door – the main place of worship of the tomb – is sometimes not located on the west wall. Given that the tradition of placing the false door precisely on the western wall had deep roots for centuries, these cases raise a legitimate question about the reasons for such an anomaly. But the paucity of examples, both in Giza and in other necropolises, made it difficult to conduct a broad analysis of this phenomenon.\nThis question has been repeatedly raised in the literature, but it is still debatable. And after the discovery of new examples at the site of the Russian Archaeological Mission at Giza of the Institute of Oriental Studies, RAS (RAMG), it became necessary to return to this problem to analyze it, to structure and summarize the early information, to try to understand the nature of the occurrence of such cases.\nA total of nine such cases are known in the Giza necropolis; all of them date from the time of the V–VI dynasties, when the necropolis is drastically compacted – and the tombs are occupied by any vacant space. It was not always possible to place false doors on the western wall of the chapels for each individual burial. As a result, sometimes the builders deliberately placed a false door not on the western wall but in the immediate vicinity of the burial to emphasise the connection between them.","PeriodicalId":159294,"journal":{"name":"Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s086919080013935-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the chapels of a number of tombs in the Giza necropolis, both rock-cut and stone (mastaba), the false door – the main place of worship of the tomb – is sometimes not located on the west wall. Given that the tradition of placing the false door precisely on the western wall had deep roots for centuries, these cases raise a legitimate question about the reasons for such an anomaly. But the paucity of examples, both in Giza and in other necropolises, made it difficult to conduct a broad analysis of this phenomenon. This question has been repeatedly raised in the literature, but it is still debatable. And after the discovery of new examples at the site of the Russian Archaeological Mission at Giza of the Institute of Oriental Studies, RAS (RAMG), it became necessary to return to this problem to analyze it, to structure and summarize the early information, to try to understand the nature of the occurrence of such cases. A total of nine such cases are known in the Giza necropolis; all of them date from the time of the V–VI dynasties, when the necropolis is drastically compacted – and the tombs are occupied by any vacant space. It was not always possible to place false doors on the western wall of the chapels for each individual burial. As a result, sometimes the builders deliberately placed a false door not on the western wall but in the immediate vicinity of the burial to emphasise the connection between them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吉萨古墓中假门的不标准位置——是建筑错误还是最不邪恶的解决方案?
在吉萨墓地的一些坟墓的小礼拜堂中,无论是岩石切割还是石头(mastaba),假门-坟墓的主要礼拜场所-有时不在西墙上。鉴于将假门精确地放置在西墙上的传统已经根深蒂固了几个世纪,这些案例提出了一个合理的问题,即这种异常现象的原因。但是,无论是在吉萨还是在其他墓地,都缺乏这样的例子,因此很难对这一现象进行广泛的分析。这个问题在文献中被反复提出,但仍有争议。在吉萨东方研究所的俄罗斯考古使团遗址发现新的例子之后,RAS (RAMG),有必要回到这个问题上来分析它,组织和总结早期的信息,试图理解这种情况发生的性质。在吉萨墓地共有9起这样的案件;所有这些都可以追溯到五至六王朝时期,当时墓地被大大压缩,坟墓被任何空闲的空间所占据。在礼拜堂的西墙上为每个单独的葬礼设置假门是不可能的。因此,有时建造者故意在墓葬附近而不是在西墙上设置假门,以强调两者之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
«Cimmero-Scythian» antiquities from Central Anatolia Ancient Chinese economic thought and the French academic context of the 1930s: Li Zhaoyi’s doctoral thesis China’s discourse power: instruments and strategy Ascetics and/or laypeople: Jain view on humam status in the world Royal women-sistrophoroi: to the interpretation of sistrum symbolism un cultic practice of the New Kingdom Period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1