Review on Vocabulary Teaching Strategies: Study Case: Effect of Learners’ Lexical Recall

Despita, Politeknik Darussalam, Stia Satya Negara
{"title":"Review on Vocabulary Teaching Strategies: Study Case: Effect of Learners’ Lexical Recall","authors":"Despita, Politeknik Darussalam, Stia Satya Negara","doi":"10.31540/jeell.v5i2.1934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study's goal was to contrast the results of of various vocabulary teaching methods, such as using context, dictionary definitions, and synonyms to teach vocabulary, on both transient and persistent vocabulary memory. Three groups of 90 intermediate EFL students were chosen at random and divided into: context, definition, and synonyms (thirty learners in each group). They received instruction in 30 vocabulary words over the course of two sessions. Two post-tests were administered, the first four weeks after the lesson and the second eight weeks later, to gauge student retention of vocabulary words. One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the results. When compared to the other two approaches, the context method outperformed them in both postponed tests, according to the data. The study's conclusions have pedagogical ramifications for EFL instructors, students, syllabus designers, content creators, and language test creators. The study's findings also offer useful details on the best method for teaching vocabulary that results in longer-lasting retention of L2 terms.","PeriodicalId":415750,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Education, Literature and Linguistics","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Education, Literature and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31540/jeell.v5i2.1934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study's goal was to contrast the results of of various vocabulary teaching methods, such as using context, dictionary definitions, and synonyms to teach vocabulary, on both transient and persistent vocabulary memory. Three groups of 90 intermediate EFL students were chosen at random and divided into: context, definition, and synonyms (thirty learners in each group). They received instruction in 30 vocabulary words over the course of two sessions. Two post-tests were administered, the first four weeks after the lesson and the second eight weeks later, to gauge student retention of vocabulary words. One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the results. When compared to the other two approaches, the context method outperformed them in both postponed tests, according to the data. The study's conclusions have pedagogical ramifications for EFL instructors, students, syllabus designers, content creators, and language test creators. The study's findings also offer useful details on the best method for teaching vocabulary that results in longer-lasting retention of L2 terms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
词汇教学策略综述:研究案例:学习者词汇回忆的影响
本研究的目的是比较不同的词汇教学方法,如使用上下文、词典定义和同义词来教授词汇,对瞬时和持久词汇记忆的效果。本研究随机选取90名中级英语学习者为三组,分为语境组、释义组和同义词组(每组30人)。他们在两个疗程中接受了30个单词的指导。在课程结束后的四周和八周后进行了两次后测试,以评估学生对词汇的记忆。采用单因素方差分析对结果进行评价。数据显示,与其他两种方法相比,上下文方法在两个延迟测试中的表现都优于它们。该研究的结论对英语教师、学生、教学大纲设计者、内容创造者和语言测试创造者具有教学意义。这项研究的发现还提供了一些有用的细节,说明了教授词汇的最佳方法,从而使第二语言词汇的记忆更持久。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review on Vocabulary Teaching Strategies: Study Case: Effect of Learners’ Lexical Recall IMPLEMENTATION OF LEARNING MEDIA DURING THE PANDEMIC STUDENTS’ DIFFICULTY IN WRITING ENGLISH: AFFECTED BY VOCABULARY SKILLS ANALYSIS OF EXPERIENCES TEXT RELATIONSHIP (ETR) METHOD IN THE JOURNAL ARTICLE Analyzing Negation Markers in the Online News Article
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1