São Tomás de Aquino metido num “imbróglio”: A demonstração da existência de Deus

S. Oliveira
{"title":"São Tomás de Aquino metido num “imbróglio”: A demonstração da existência de Deus","authors":"S. Oliveira","doi":"10.53943/elcv.0219_13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to clarify the thesis by St. Thomas Aquinas, according to which it is possible to prove that the existence of God can be demonstrated. On the basis of the analyses in Summa Theologica I, q.2 and Summa contra gentiles I (I-XV), there is an attempt to understand the meaning and relevance of this thesis, its implications and its philosophical and theological significance. Thomas Aquinas’ analyses underline the importance of distinguishing between a knowledge about the existence of God and one regarding his essence, while highlighting in each case a set of difficulties and lack of knowledge factors. In a context where the idea of confusion plays a central role, Thomas Aquinas tries to show that: a) no matter how confused knowledge about God is and no matter how large the disproportion between the human and divine perspectives, there is an ineradicable notitia Dei, and b) this notice is linked at the same time to the inability to know God’s essenceand the ability to demonstrate His existenceby means of certain effects and traces of His. This all leads to the peculiar demonstration of the existence of a Deus absconditus. It is precisely the discovery of this God who manifests himself and at the same time hides himself that makes it possible to document the pos-sibility of demonstrating that God exists and that constitutes the foundations on which every and any demonstration of the existence of God rests.","PeriodicalId":288631,"journal":{"name":"e-Letras com Vida: Revista de Estudos Globais — Humanidades, Ciências e Artes","volume":"56 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Letras com Vida: Revista de Estudos Globais — Humanidades, Ciências e Artes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53943/elcv.0219_13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article attempts to clarify the thesis by St. Thomas Aquinas, according to which it is possible to prove that the existence of God can be demonstrated. On the basis of the analyses in Summa Theologica I, q.2 and Summa contra gentiles I (I-XV), there is an attempt to understand the meaning and relevance of this thesis, its implications and its philosophical and theological significance. Thomas Aquinas’ analyses underline the importance of distinguishing between a knowledge about the existence of God and one regarding his essence, while highlighting in each case a set of difficulties and lack of knowledge factors. In a context where the idea of confusion plays a central role, Thomas Aquinas tries to show that: a) no matter how confused knowledge about God is and no matter how large the disproportion between the human and divine perspectives, there is an ineradicable notitia Dei, and b) this notice is linked at the same time to the inability to know God’s essenceand the ability to demonstrate His existenceby means of certain effects and traces of His. This all leads to the peculiar demonstration of the existence of a Deus absconditus. It is precisely the discovery of this God who manifests himself and at the same time hides himself that makes it possible to document the pos-sibility of demonstrating that God exists and that constitutes the foundations on which every and any demonstration of the existence of God rests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣托马斯·阿奎那陷入了“混乱”:上帝存在的证明
本文试图澄清圣托马斯·阿奎那的论文,根据该论文,有可能证明上帝的存在是可以证明的。在对《神学总论》第一章、第二章和《反论总论》第一章(I- xv)的分析基础上,试图理解本文的意义和相关性、内涵及其哲学和神学意义。托马斯·阿奎那的分析强调了区分关于上帝存在的知识和关于上帝本质的知识的重要性,同时在每种情况下都强调了一系列困难和缺乏知识的因素。在混乱思想占据中心地位的背景下,托马斯·阿奎那试图表明:a)无论关于上帝的知识多么混乱,无论人与神的观点之间有多大的不平衡,都有一种不可消除的上帝意识,b)这种意识同时与无法知道上帝的本质以及无法通过上帝的某些效果和痕迹来证明他的存在的能力联系在一起。这一切都导致了对“逃避的上帝”存在的特殊论证。正是发现了这个既显现自己又隐藏自己的上帝,才有可能证明上帝存在的可能性,这才构成了证明上帝存在的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Os riscos de bordado — Caminhos da prosa romântica brasileira Zaíta não será esquecida: a vida em fragmentos e as crianças em Conceição Evaristo Narradores-trapeiros, anarquivamento e fragmentação em romances de Benedicto Monteiro Repressão e violência do Estado no romance O corpo interminável, de Cláudia Lage Apresentação - Dossiê Temático
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1