Taxation of wealth and the rich as a social imperative

Volodymyr L. Andrushchenko, Mariana Rippa, Tetiana Tuchak
{"title":"Taxation of wealth and the rich as a social imperative","authors":"Volodymyr L. Andrushchenko, Mariana Rippa, Tetiana Tuchak","doi":"10.31470/2306-546x-2022-55-119-126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the article is the problem of taxing the rich and wealth, which is among the topical topics of public interest. The study aimed to highlight the latest initiative of a group of American multimillionaires to increase the level of tax rates on this ultra-rich category of taxpayers. This initiative can be considered a solidarity tax. The task was to characterize the quantitative indicators of this initiative. The article is motivated by the striking fact that 400 American ultra-billionaires have a total wealth worth 4 thousand billion dollars! The role of the research method of the problem was carried out by analyzing the quantitative parameters and fiscal and administrative features of taxation of the rich. Results of work. First of all, the results of the study consist in the interpretation of the multicomponent concept of wealth as an object of taxation. The impossibility of a general income and property tax is revealed, such a tax exists only as an unrealized project. The fiscal and administrative reasons for the abandonment of the inheritance tax in 21 countries, including Austria, Canada, Sweden and Israel, are clarified. Conclusions. The arguments are presented that property taxes harm the processes of wealth creation and capital. For this reason, the share of property taxes in tax revenues has fallen from 42% to 14% since the beginning of the XX century. The most significant fiscal potential for strengthening the taxation of the rich are taxes on income and profits. A quantitative and institutional analysis of existing wealth taxes in Norway and Switzerland was carried out. A serious fiscal and administrative problem of wealth taxes is the valuation of taxable assets. The wealth taxes have very great, virtually inexhaustible scientific and practical potential.","PeriodicalId":256787,"journal":{"name":"University Economic Bulletin","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Economic Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31470/2306-546x-2022-55-119-126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the article is the problem of taxing the rich and wealth, which is among the topical topics of public interest. The study aimed to highlight the latest initiative of a group of American multimillionaires to increase the level of tax rates on this ultra-rich category of taxpayers. This initiative can be considered a solidarity tax. The task was to characterize the quantitative indicators of this initiative. The article is motivated by the striking fact that 400 American ultra-billionaires have a total wealth worth 4 thousand billion dollars! The role of the research method of the problem was carried out by analyzing the quantitative parameters and fiscal and administrative features of taxation of the rich. Results of work. First of all, the results of the study consist in the interpretation of the multicomponent concept of wealth as an object of taxation. The impossibility of a general income and property tax is revealed, such a tax exists only as an unrealized project. The fiscal and administrative reasons for the abandonment of the inheritance tax in 21 countries, including Austria, Canada, Sweden and Israel, are clarified. Conclusions. The arguments are presented that property taxes harm the processes of wealth creation and capital. For this reason, the share of property taxes in tax revenues has fallen from 42% to 14% since the beginning of the XX century. The most significant fiscal potential for strengthening the taxation of the rich are taxes on income and profits. A quantitative and institutional analysis of existing wealth taxes in Norway and Switzerland was carried out. A serious fiscal and administrative problem of wealth taxes is the valuation of taxable assets. The wealth taxes have very great, virtually inexhaustible scientific and practical potential.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对财富和富人征税是社会的当务之急
这篇文章的主题是对富人和财富征税的问题,这是公众感兴趣的话题之一。这项研究旨在强调一群美国千万富翁的最新举措,即提高这类超级富豪纳税人的税率水平。这一倡议可被视为团结税。任务是描述这一倡议的数量指标。这篇文章的动机是一个惊人的事实,即400名美国超级亿万富翁的总财富价值4万亿美元!通过对富人征税的定量参数和财政行政特征的分析,对问题的研究方法的作用进行了探讨。工作成果。首先,研究结果包括对财富作为征税对象的多成分概念的解释。普遍征收所得税和财产税的不可能性暴露出来,这种税只存在于一个未实现的项目中。对奥地利、加拿大、瑞典、以色列等21个国家废除继承税的财政、行政原因进行了分析。结论。有人提出,财产税损害了财富创造和资本的过程。因此,自20世纪初以来,财产税在税收收入中的份额从42%下降到14%。加强对富人征税的最重要的财政潜力是对收入和利润征税。对挪威和瑞士现有的财富税进行了数量和体制分析。财富税的一个严重的财政和行政问题是应税资产的估值。财富税具有巨大的、几乎取之不尽的科学和实践潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Activities of non-banking financial institutions in Ukraine under the conditions of marital state Development of the agro-industrial complex of the Republic of Moldova, ways to improve the sphere and management system Organisation of accounting for travel agents Financial and security factors of competitiveness of agricultural enterprises under martial law Benevolence in the functioning system of united territorial communities: communication and management elements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1