Vibrotactile Take-over Requests in Highly Automated Driving

Duanfeng Chu, Rukang Wang, Ying Deng, Lingping Lu, Chaozhong Wu
{"title":"Vibrotactile Take-over Requests in Highly Automated Driving","authors":"Duanfeng Chu, Rukang Wang, Ying Deng, Lingping Lu, Chaozhong Wu","doi":"10.1109/CVCI51460.2020.9338667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highly automated vehicle has the possibility in getting stuck with edge scenarios where the automation cannot handle. Under this circumstance, sending out a takeover request and dragging the driver back into the control loop are required to avoid traffic accidents. Among various possible modalities for alerting drivers about take-over requests, vibrotactile alerts provide significant advantages. A driver-in-the-loop and hardware-in-the loop driving simulator was designed for the investigation of take-over performance. In this simulator, take-over signal was provided the vibration motors embedded in the vibrotactile seat. Moreover, body pressure mapping test illustrated that the vibration motors fixed in the vibrotactile seat would not reduce seating comfort. Twenty-four vibration patterns were generated via the vibration motors embedded in the backrest and cushion of the vibrotactile seat. Besides, Eighteen participants were recruited to take part in the experiment, which consisted of three sessions: 1) baseline (no driving task), 2) HAD (driving a highly automated vehicle and getting ready for the respond to the take-over request), 3) N-back (performing the same task with mental demanding task added in). Specifically, in baseline session, participants need the only answer regarding the type of vibration pattern. However in HAD and N-Back session, participants had to perform the maneuver (steering left/right or braking) according to the coding directional information of vibration patterns. Correct response rate and reaction time of each participant in each session were recorded and analysed. The results indicated that dynamic patterns yielded significantly higher correct response rate than static patterns. In addition, reaction times for dynamic patterns were faster than those for static patterns, but the effect was not statistically significant. Moreover, ANOVA tests illustrated that mental-demanding non-driving task had no significant effect on take-over performance.","PeriodicalId":119721,"journal":{"name":"2020 4th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 4th CAA International Conference on Vehicular Control and Intelligence (CVCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CVCI51460.2020.9338667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Highly automated vehicle has the possibility in getting stuck with edge scenarios where the automation cannot handle. Under this circumstance, sending out a takeover request and dragging the driver back into the control loop are required to avoid traffic accidents. Among various possible modalities for alerting drivers about take-over requests, vibrotactile alerts provide significant advantages. A driver-in-the-loop and hardware-in-the loop driving simulator was designed for the investigation of take-over performance. In this simulator, take-over signal was provided the vibration motors embedded in the vibrotactile seat. Moreover, body pressure mapping test illustrated that the vibration motors fixed in the vibrotactile seat would not reduce seating comfort. Twenty-four vibration patterns were generated via the vibration motors embedded in the backrest and cushion of the vibrotactile seat. Besides, Eighteen participants were recruited to take part in the experiment, which consisted of three sessions: 1) baseline (no driving task), 2) HAD (driving a highly automated vehicle and getting ready for the respond to the take-over request), 3) N-back (performing the same task with mental demanding task added in). Specifically, in baseline session, participants need the only answer regarding the type of vibration pattern. However in HAD and N-Back session, participants had to perform the maneuver (steering left/right or braking) according to the coding directional information of vibration patterns. Correct response rate and reaction time of each participant in each session were recorded and analysed. The results indicated that dynamic patterns yielded significantly higher correct response rate than static patterns. In addition, reaction times for dynamic patterns were faster than those for static patterns, but the effect was not statistically significant. Moreover, ANOVA tests illustrated that mental-demanding non-driving task had no significant effect on take-over performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高度自动驾驶中的振动触觉接管要求
高度自动化的车辆有可能陷入自动化无法处理的边缘场景。在这种情况下,需要发送接管请求并将驾驶员拉回控制回路,以避免发生交通事故。在各种可能的提醒司机接管请求的方式中,触觉振动警报提供了显著的优势。为研究接管性能,设计了驱动在环和硬件在环驱动模拟器。在该模拟器中,接管信号由嵌入在振动触觉座中的振动电机提供。此外,人体压力测绘试验表明,振动电机安装在振动触觉座椅上不会降低座椅的舒适性。通过嵌入在振动触觉座椅靠背和坐垫中的振动电机产生24种振动模式。此外,还招募了18名参与者参加实验,实验包括三个阶段:1)基线(无驾驶任务),2)HAD(驾驶高度自动化的车辆并准备对接管请求的响应),3)N-back(执行相同的任务,但增加了脑力要求任务)。具体来说,在基线会话中,参与者需要关于振动模式类型的唯一答案。然而,在HAD和N-Back会话中,参与者必须根据振动模式的编码方向信息执行机动(向左/向右转向或制动)。记录并分析每个参与者在每个会话中的正确反应率和反应时间。结果表明,动态模式的正确率明显高于静态模式。此外,动态图案的反应时间比静态图案的反应时间快,但这种影响没有统计学意义。此外,方差分析表明,非驾驶任务对接管绩效没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Sensor Fusion of Camera, GNSS and IMU for Autonomous Driving Navigation Collision-avoidance steering control for autonomous vehicles using fast non-singular terminal sliding mode Energy management strategy based on velocity prediction for parallel plug-in hybrid electric bus Constrained Containment Control of Agents Network with Switching Topologies Multi-parameter driver intention recognition based on neural network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1