Inter-Caste Gender Performativity in Indian Hindu Culture: A Postcolonial Gender Study in Mulk Raj Anand’s Untouchable and Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things

Tasnim Jarin, Aftab Ur, Rahaman Zahin
{"title":"Inter-Caste Gender Performativity in Indian Hindu Culture: A Postcolonial Gender Study in Mulk Raj Anand’s Untouchable and Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things","authors":"Tasnim Jarin, Aftab Ur, Rahaman Zahin","doi":"10.59075/zjss.v2i1.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses Judith Butler's concept of \"gender performativity\" to examine Mulk Raj Anand's \"Untouchable\" and Arundhati Roy's \"The God of Small Things\" in order to draw conclusions about the inter-caste gender performativity in Indian Hindu culture. Some autobiographical writings preserved evidence of voluntary and 'non-theatrical inter-caste connection' which transcends the boundary of untouchability, despite the dogmatic and historic hostility against inter-caste relationships in Indian Hindu society. In a consenting intercaste relationship, women, as the subaltern gender, never know for sure what caste they belong to. They are generally discovered to be branded off the caste of the males who touched them, rather than naturally belonging to any caste of them. Women in non-consensual inter-caste relationships are kept quiet by the strong touch of males from higher castes, yet this does not affect their social status. It's a double standard, and the higher classes control both settings. The non-dramatic setting challenges the elite rhetoric of 'impurity' and the concept that inter-caste contact would result in retribution in the next world. This connection demonstrates that the theatrical concept is nothing more than a bourgeois-political tool used by the ruling class to subjugate the lower classes. This study is qualitative in nature and was conducted using a closed-textual-reading approach. The impact of inter-caste gender performativity on both authors is discussed, and the gender performativity of Hindu castes is examined in four settings (theatrical, non-theatrical, public, and private). The study demonstrates that each author is impacted in their own unique way by gender performativity as imposed by society, and that gender performativity is conditional within the Indian Hindu castes, both onstage and off.","PeriodicalId":378779,"journal":{"name":"Zakariya Journal of Social Science","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zakariya Journal of Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59075/zjss.v2i1.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study uses Judith Butler's concept of "gender performativity" to examine Mulk Raj Anand's "Untouchable" and Arundhati Roy's "The God of Small Things" in order to draw conclusions about the inter-caste gender performativity in Indian Hindu culture. Some autobiographical writings preserved evidence of voluntary and 'non-theatrical inter-caste connection' which transcends the boundary of untouchability, despite the dogmatic and historic hostility against inter-caste relationships in Indian Hindu society. In a consenting intercaste relationship, women, as the subaltern gender, never know for sure what caste they belong to. They are generally discovered to be branded off the caste of the males who touched them, rather than naturally belonging to any caste of them. Women in non-consensual inter-caste relationships are kept quiet by the strong touch of males from higher castes, yet this does not affect their social status. It's a double standard, and the higher classes control both settings. The non-dramatic setting challenges the elite rhetoric of 'impurity' and the concept that inter-caste contact would result in retribution in the next world. This connection demonstrates that the theatrical concept is nothing more than a bourgeois-political tool used by the ruling class to subjugate the lower classes. This study is qualitative in nature and was conducted using a closed-textual-reading approach. The impact of inter-caste gender performativity on both authors is discussed, and the gender performativity of Hindu castes is examined in four settings (theatrical, non-theatrical, public, and private). The study demonstrates that each author is impacted in their own unique way by gender performativity as imposed by society, and that gender performativity is conditional within the Indian Hindu castes, both onstage and off.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度印度教文化中的跨种姓性别表演:穆尔克·拉杰·阿南德的《贱民》和阿兰达蒂·罗伊的《小事物之神》的后殖民性别研究
本研究运用Judith Butler的“性别表演性”概念,考察Mulk Raj Anand的《贱民》和Arundhati Roy的《小事物之神》,以期得出印度印度教文化中跨种姓性别表演性的结论。一些自传体作品保留了自愿的和“非戏剧性的跨种姓联系”的证据,这种联系超越了贱民的界限,尽管印度印度教社会对跨种姓关系存在教条主义和历史上的敌意。在一个自愿的跨种姓关系中,女性作为次等性别,永远不知道自己属于哪个种姓。人们通常发现,她们被打上了与接触过她们的男性所属种姓不同的烙印,而不是自然地属于其中任何一个种姓。在非自愿的跨种姓关系中,女性在高种姓男性的强烈接触下保持沉默,但这并不影响她们的社会地位。这是一种双重标准,更高的阶级控制着两种设置。非戏剧性的背景挑战了“不洁”的精英修辞,以及种姓之间的接触会导致来世报应的概念。这种联系表明,戏剧概念只不过是统治阶级用来征服下层阶级的资产阶级政治工具。本研究本质上是定性的,采用封闭的文本阅读方法进行。本文讨论了种姓间性别表现对两位作者的影响,并在四种环境(戏剧、非戏剧、公共和私人)中考察了印度教种姓的性别表现。该研究表明,每个作者都以自己独特的方式受到社会强加的性别表演的影响,而性别表演在印度印度教种姓中是有条件的,无论是在舞台上还是在舞台下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Demographic Factors and Job Satisfaction among Non-academic Staff of Government Schools in Colombo District, Sri Lanka Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion Theoretically Justification of Human Rights: A Case of Natural Rights Theory Inter-Caste Gender Performativity in Indian Hindu Culture: A Postcolonial Gender Study in Mulk Raj Anand’s Untouchable and Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things Declassifying Theory of Separation of Powers and its Inherent System of Checks and Balances: A Comparative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1