SPAC Attack: An Examination of SPAC Director Compensation and Its Legal Implications

Hunter Fortney
{"title":"SPAC Attack: An Examination of SPAC Director Compensation and Its Legal Implications","authors":"Hunter Fortney","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3911337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Special Purpose Acquisition Company (“SPAC”) directors are compensated with economic ownership of founders shares, shares which have value if the SPAC combines with an operating business and which expire worthless if that does not occur. By analyzing the public filings of the 248 SPACs that IPOed in 2020, I create a dataset of SPAC director compensation, which is the first of its kind. I find that a director of the median SPAC receives approximately 30,000 founders shares (estimated value $300,000) and a director of the average SPAC receives approximately 40,000 founders shares (estimated value $400,000). I then demonstrate how the current director compensation subjects SPACs and their directors to greater litigation risk under Delaware law. Specifically, SPAC directors may not be considered independent under Delaware law because of the structure and quantum of compensation via founders shares. Furthermore, under Delaware law, if SPAC directors are not independent, legal claims surrounding the SPAC merger may be examined under the exacting entire fairness standard rather than the deferential business judgement rule because potential procedural safeguards of the SPAC, such as the shareholder vote, may not be sufficiently “cleansing.” Finally, I propose changes in SPAC director compensation to improve director independence.","PeriodicalId":170679,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Board Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Board Motivation & Incentives (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Special Purpose Acquisition Company (“SPAC”) directors are compensated with economic ownership of founders shares, shares which have value if the SPAC combines with an operating business and which expire worthless if that does not occur. By analyzing the public filings of the 248 SPACs that IPOed in 2020, I create a dataset of SPAC director compensation, which is the first of its kind. I find that a director of the median SPAC receives approximately 30,000 founders shares (estimated value $300,000) and a director of the average SPAC receives approximately 40,000 founders shares (estimated value $400,000). I then demonstrate how the current director compensation subjects SPACs and their directors to greater litigation risk under Delaware law. Specifically, SPAC directors may not be considered independent under Delaware law because of the structure and quantum of compensation via founders shares. Furthermore, under Delaware law, if SPAC directors are not independent, legal claims surrounding the SPAC merger may be examined under the exacting entire fairness standard rather than the deferential business judgement rule because potential procedural safeguards of the SPAC, such as the shareholder vote, may not be sufficiently “cleansing.” Finally, I propose changes in SPAC director compensation to improve director independence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPAC攻击:对SPAC董事薪酬及其法律含义的考察
特殊目的收购公司(“SPAC”)的董事获得创始人股份的经济所有权作为补偿,如果SPAC与一家经营企业合并,这些股份就有价值,如果没有合并,这些股份就会一文不值。通过分析2020年上市的248家SPAC的公开文件,我创建了一个SPAC董事薪酬数据集,这是同类数据集中的第一个。我发现,SPAC的中位数董事获得大约30,000股创始人股份(估计价值300,000美元),而SPAC的平均董事获得大约40,000股创始人股份(估计价值400,000美元)。然后,我展示了当前的董事薪酬如何使spac及其董事在特拉华州法律下面临更大的诉讼风险。具体来说,根据特拉华州法律,由于通过创始人股份获得的薪酬结构和数量,SPAC董事可能不会被视为独立董事。此外,根据特拉华州的法律,如果SPAC董事不是独立的,围绕SPAC合并的法律索赔可能会根据严格的整体公平标准而不是恭顺的商业判断规则进行审查,因为SPAC的潜在程序保障,如股东投票,可能不足以“清理”。最后,笔者提出了改革SPAC董事薪酬以提高董事独立性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SPAC Attack: An Examination of SPAC Director Compensation and Its Legal Implications Work-to-Unlock Rewards: Leveraging Goals in Reward Systems to Increase Consumer Persistence The Dark Side of Share Buybacks Contrasting Incentives for Earnings Management: Board Activity and Board Remuneration in Spanish Firms Vergütungssysteme für Vorstände – Eine Analyse mehrjähriger Bemessungsgrundlagen und Caps (The Design of Executive Compensation – An Analysis of Long-Term Compensation Components and Caps)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1