SearchBots: User Engagement with ChatBots during Collaborative Search

Sandeep Avula, Gordon Chadwick, Jaime Arguello, Robert G. Capra
{"title":"SearchBots: User Engagement with ChatBots during Collaborative Search","authors":"Sandeep Avula, Gordon Chadwick, Jaime Arguello, Robert G. Capra","doi":"10.1145/3176349.3176380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popular messaging platforms such as Slack have given rise to hundreds of chatbots that users can engage with individually or as a group. We present a Wizard of Oz study on the use of searchbots (i.e., chatbots that perform specific types of searches) during collaborative information-seeking tasks. Specifically, we study searchbots that intervene dynamically and compare between two intervention types: (1) the searchbot presents questions to users to gather the information it needs to produce results, and (2) the searchbot monitors the conversation among the collaborators, infers the necessary information, and then displays search results with no additional input from the users. We investigate three research questions: (RQ1) What is the effect of a searchbot (and its intervention type) on participants» collaborative experience' (RQ2) What is the effect of a searchbot»s intervention type on participants» perceptions about the searchbot and level of engagement with the searchbot' and (RQ3) What are participants» impressions of a dynamic searchbot? Our results suggest that dynamic searchbots can enhance users» collaborative experience and that the intervention type does not greatly affect users» perceptions and level of engagement. Participants» impressions of the searchbot suggest unique opportunities and challenges for future work.","PeriodicalId":198379,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Popular messaging platforms such as Slack have given rise to hundreds of chatbots that users can engage with individually or as a group. We present a Wizard of Oz study on the use of searchbots (i.e., chatbots that perform specific types of searches) during collaborative information-seeking tasks. Specifically, we study searchbots that intervene dynamically and compare between two intervention types: (1) the searchbot presents questions to users to gather the information it needs to produce results, and (2) the searchbot monitors the conversation among the collaborators, infers the necessary information, and then displays search results with no additional input from the users. We investigate three research questions: (RQ1) What is the effect of a searchbot (and its intervention type) on participants» collaborative experience' (RQ2) What is the effect of a searchbot»s intervention type on participants» perceptions about the searchbot and level of engagement with the searchbot' and (RQ3) What are participants» impressions of a dynamic searchbot? Our results suggest that dynamic searchbots can enhance users» collaborative experience and that the intervention type does not greatly affect users» perceptions and level of engagement. Participants» impressions of the searchbot suggest unique opportunities and challenges for future work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
搜索机器人:用户在协作搜索过程中与聊天机器人的互动
Slack等流行的通讯平台已经产生了数百个聊天机器人,用户可以单独或作为一个群体与之互动。我们展示了一项关于搜索机器人(即执行特定类型搜索的聊天机器人)在协作信息搜索任务中的使用的绿野仙踪研究。具体来说,我们研究了动态干预的搜索机器人,并比较了两种干预类型:(1)搜索机器人向用户提出问题以收集产生结果所需的信息;(2)搜索机器人监控协作者之间的对话,推断必要的信息,然后在没有用户额外输入的情况下显示搜索结果。我们调查了三个研究问题:(RQ1)搜索机器人(及其干预类型)对参与者“协作体验”的影响(RQ2)搜索机器人的干预类型对参与者“对搜索机器人的感知和与搜索机器人的参与程度”的影响(RQ3)参与者对动态搜索机器人的印象是什么?我们的研究结果表明,动态搜索机器人可以增强用户的协作体验,并且干预类型不会对用户的感知和参与水平产生很大影响。参与者对搜索机器人的印象暗示了未来工作的独特机遇和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Distant Voices in the Dark: Understanding the Incongruent Information Needs of Fiction Authors and Readers Visualizing and Exploring Scientific Literature with CiteSpace: An Introduction What Sources to Rely on:: Laypeople's Source Selection in Online Health Information Seeking Investigating Everyday Information Behavior of Using Ambient Displays: A Case of Indoor Air Quality Monitors Collaborative Information Seeking through Social Media Updates in Real-Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1