Mapping the Potential for Infectious Disease Transmission in a Wide-Body Aircraft Cabin

Seif Mahmoud, J. Bennett, M. Hosni, B. Jones
{"title":"Mapping the Potential for Infectious Disease Transmission in a Wide-Body Aircraft Cabin","authors":"Seif Mahmoud, J. Bennett, M. Hosni, B. Jones","doi":"10.1115/imece2019-11377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With more than two billion passengers annually, in-flight transmission of infectious diseases is a major global health concern. It is widely believed that principal transmission risk associated with air travel for most respiratory infectious diseases is limited to within two rows of an infectious passenger. However, several passengers became infected despite sitting several rows away from the contagious passenger.\n This work thoroughly investigated the potential for disease spread inside airplane cabins using tracer gas to quantify airborne dispersion. Measurements were conducted in a full-scale, 11-row mock-up of a wide-body aircraft cabin. Heated mannequins to simulate passengers’ thermal load were placed on the cabin seats. Tracer gas was injected at the breathing level at four different hypothetical contagious passenger locations. The tracer gas concentration was measured radially up to 3.35 m away from the injection location representing four rows of a standard aircraft. A four-port sampling tree was used to collect samples at the breathing level at four different radial locations simultaneously. Each port was sampled for 30 minutes.\n A total of 42 tests were conducted in matching pairs to alleviate potential statistical or measurements bias. The results showed that the airflow pattern inside the mock-up airplane cabin plays a major role in determining tracer gas concentration meaning that the concentration at the same radial distance in different directions are not necessarily the same. Also, due to the air distribution pattern and cabin walls, concentrations at some seats may be higher than the source seat.","PeriodicalId":119220,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Advances in Aerospace Technology","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Advances in Aerospace Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2019-11377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With more than two billion passengers annually, in-flight transmission of infectious diseases is a major global health concern. It is widely believed that principal transmission risk associated with air travel for most respiratory infectious diseases is limited to within two rows of an infectious passenger. However, several passengers became infected despite sitting several rows away from the contagious passenger. This work thoroughly investigated the potential for disease spread inside airplane cabins using tracer gas to quantify airborne dispersion. Measurements were conducted in a full-scale, 11-row mock-up of a wide-body aircraft cabin. Heated mannequins to simulate passengers’ thermal load were placed on the cabin seats. Tracer gas was injected at the breathing level at four different hypothetical contagious passenger locations. The tracer gas concentration was measured radially up to 3.35 m away from the injection location representing four rows of a standard aircraft. A four-port sampling tree was used to collect samples at the breathing level at four different radial locations simultaneously. Each port was sampled for 30 minutes. A total of 42 tests were conducted in matching pairs to alleviate potential statistical or measurements bias. The results showed that the airflow pattern inside the mock-up airplane cabin plays a major role in determining tracer gas concentration meaning that the concentration at the same radial distance in different directions are not necessarily the same. Also, due to the air distribution pattern and cabin walls, concentrations at some seats may be higher than the source seat.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制传染病在宽体飞机客舱传播的可能性
每年有20多亿乘客乘坐飞机,飞机上传染病的传播是一个主要的全球健康问题。人们普遍认为,与大多数呼吸道传染病有关的航空旅行的主要传播风险仅限于传染性乘客的两排以内。然而,几名乘客尽管与感染的乘客隔了几排,但还是被感染了。这项工作彻底调查了疾病在飞机机舱内传播的可能性,使用示踪气体量化空气传播。测量是在一个全尺寸、11排的宽体飞机机舱模型中进行的。加热的人体模型被放置在客舱座椅上,以模拟乘客的热负荷。示踪气体被注入到四个不同的假设感染乘客的呼吸水平。示踪气体浓度沿径向距离注射位置3.35 m处测量,代表一架标准飞机的四排。采用四端口采样树同时在四个不同的径向位置采集呼吸水平的样本。每个端口采样30分钟。共进行了42项配对试验,以减轻潜在的统计或测量偏差。结果表明,模拟飞机客舱内气流形态对示踪气体浓度的影响较大,不同方向相同径向距离处的示踪气体浓度不一定相同。此外,由于空气分布模式和客舱壁,某些座位的浓度可能高于源座位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Best Structural Theories for Free Vibrations of Sandwich Composites via Machine Learning Effect of Cryogenic Temperature Rolling on High Speed Impact Behavior of AA 6082 Thin Targets Neural Network Inverse Based Omnidirectional Rotation Decoupling Control to the Electrodynamic Reaction Sphere Structural Dynamic Testing Results for Air-Independent Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Technologies for Space Applications Effect of Shear Overloads on Crack Propagation in Al-7075 Under In-Plane Biaxial Fatigue Loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1