F. Salgado, D. Jimenez, Iván Santelices, Nathalie Risso
{"title":"Validating Bachelor of Engineering Competencies: An Internship-based approach","authors":"F. Salgado, D. Jimenez, Iván Santelices, Nathalie Risso","doi":"10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last decade, Engineering programs in Chile have shifted their focus from a traditional content-based education model to a competency-based one. Although this approach has become popular and integrated into engineering programs, its effectiveness has not been fully validated. In particular, currently there are no tools that allow verifying compliance with the competencies declared in the professional and bachelor's degree programs offered by the Engineering College at the Universidad del Bío-Bío. In this project, a survey-type instrument is validated for the evaluation of acquired graduate competencies, defined in Engineering programs at Universidad del Bío-Bío. Here, validation was carried out considering students from Industrial and Electrical civil Engineering programs. Once the instrument validity was verified, it was applied to determine the level of fulfillment of the competencies acquired at the Bachelor of Science in Engineering level. Obtained results were analyzed to identify existing gaps in the curriculum with respect to the skills expected from graduates, thus detecting different degrees of progress achieved and opportunities for improvement. The findings of this study indicate that, both specific and generic competencies at the Bachelor of Science level are within acceptable ranges, since they achieved scores above 85%.","PeriodicalId":328922,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)","volume":"858 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automation/XXIV Congress of the Chilean Association of Automatic Control (ICA-ACCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAACCA51523.2021.9465208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the last decade, Engineering programs in Chile have shifted their focus from a traditional content-based education model to a competency-based one. Although this approach has become popular and integrated into engineering programs, its effectiveness has not been fully validated. In particular, currently there are no tools that allow verifying compliance with the competencies declared in the professional and bachelor's degree programs offered by the Engineering College at the Universidad del Bío-Bío. In this project, a survey-type instrument is validated for the evaluation of acquired graduate competencies, defined in Engineering programs at Universidad del Bío-Bío. Here, validation was carried out considering students from Industrial and Electrical civil Engineering programs. Once the instrument validity was verified, it was applied to determine the level of fulfillment of the competencies acquired at the Bachelor of Science in Engineering level. Obtained results were analyzed to identify existing gaps in the curriculum with respect to the skills expected from graduates, thus detecting different degrees of progress achieved and opportunities for improvement. The findings of this study indicate that, both specific and generic competencies at the Bachelor of Science level are within acceptable ranges, since they achieved scores above 85%.
在过去的十年中,智利的工程项目已经将其重点从传统的基于内容的教育模式转移到基于能力的教育模式。尽管这种方法已经变得流行,并被整合到工程项目中,但其有效性尚未得到充分验证。特别是,目前没有工具可以验证是否符合由universsidad del Bío-Bío工程学院提供的专业和学士学位课程所宣布的能力。在这个项目中,一种测量类型的仪器被验证用于评估获得的研究生能力,在universsidad del Bío-Bío的工程项目中定义。在这里,对来自工业和电气土木工程专业的学生进行了验证。一旦仪器的有效性得到验证,它就被应用于确定在工程学士学位阶段获得的能力的实现水平。对获得的结果进行分析,以确定课程中存在的与毕业生技能期望相关的差距,从而发现取得的不同程度的进步和改进的机会。这项研究的结果表明,理学学士水平的具体和一般能力都在可接受的范围内,因为他们的得分在85%以上。