To be, or not to be, happy? That's the question: a study on three levels of the digital divide and individual happiness in China

Zhiqin Lu, Peng Li, Qinghai Li, Heng Zhang
{"title":"To be, or not to be, happy? That's the question: a study on three levels of the digital divide and individual happiness in China","authors":"Zhiqin Lu, Peng Li, Qinghai Li, Heng Zhang","doi":"10.1108/itp-04-2022-0278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper according to the logic of the “digital access divide--digital capability divide--digital outcome divide” aims to systematically discuss the impact of the digital divide on individual happiness in China, accounting for the variations that exist across different groups, as well as the corresponding mechanisms.Design/methodology/approachThis paper presents cross-sectional analyses of the relationship between the digital divide and individual happiness in China. The analyses are based on data from the Chinese General Social Survey 2017, which academic institutions run on the Chinese Mainland. This database contains information on respondents' Internet access, skills and consequences of use, which can measure the digital divide of Chinese individuals at three levels.FindingsFirst, individual happiness declined when they experienced the digital access divide in China. For the digital capability divide, the lower the usage skills, the more individual happiness declined. When analyzing the digital outcome divide, the greater the negative consequences, the more individual happiness declined. Second, the impacts of digital access, capability and outcome divide vary according to age, gender, education degrees, hukou, region and sub-dimensions. Third, the digital access and capability divide reduce individuals' happiness by lowering their self-rated social and economic status, whereas the digital outcome divide reduce individual happiness by lowering their fairness perception and social trust.Originality/valueThe authors believe that this is the first study to examine the impact and its variations among different groups of the three-level digital divide on individual happiness, as well as its mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":168000,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology & People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology & People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-04-2022-0278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper according to the logic of the “digital access divide--digital capability divide--digital outcome divide” aims to systematically discuss the impact of the digital divide on individual happiness in China, accounting for the variations that exist across different groups, as well as the corresponding mechanisms.Design/methodology/approachThis paper presents cross-sectional analyses of the relationship between the digital divide and individual happiness in China. The analyses are based on data from the Chinese General Social Survey 2017, which academic institutions run on the Chinese Mainland. This database contains information on respondents' Internet access, skills and consequences of use, which can measure the digital divide of Chinese individuals at three levels.FindingsFirst, individual happiness declined when they experienced the digital access divide in China. For the digital capability divide, the lower the usage skills, the more individual happiness declined. When analyzing the digital outcome divide, the greater the negative consequences, the more individual happiness declined. Second, the impacts of digital access, capability and outcome divide vary according to age, gender, education degrees, hukou, region and sub-dimensions. Third, the digital access and capability divide reduce individuals' happiness by lowering their self-rated social and economic status, whereas the digital outcome divide reduce individual happiness by lowering their fairness perception and social trust.Originality/valueThe authors believe that this is the first study to examine the impact and its variations among different groups of the three-level digital divide on individual happiness, as well as its mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幸福,还是不幸福?这就是问题所在:一项关于中国数字鸿沟和个人幸福感三个层面的研究
目的根据“数字接入鸿沟——数字能力鸿沟——数字结果鸿沟”的逻辑,系统探讨中国数字鸿沟对个人幸福感的影响,考虑不同群体之间存在的差异,以及相应的机制。设计/方法/方法本文对中国数字鸿沟与个人幸福感之间的关系进行了横断面分析。这些分析基于中国大陆学术机构开展的《2017年中国综合社会调查》的数据。该数据库包含被调查者的互联网接入、技能和使用后果等信息,可以从三个层面衡量中国个人的数字鸿沟。研究发现:首先,在中国,当人们经历数字接入鸿沟时,他们的个人幸福感下降了。就数字能力鸿沟而言,使用技能越低,个人幸福感下降得越多。在分析数字结果鸿沟时,负面影响越大,个人幸福感下降得越多。其次,数字接入、能力和成果鸿沟的影响在年龄、性别、教育程度、户口、地区和子维度上存在差异。第三,数字访问和能力鸿沟通过降低个体自评的社会和经济地位而降低了个体的幸福感,而数字结果鸿沟通过降低个体的公平感知和社会信任而降低了个体的幸福感。作者认为,这是第一次研究三级数字鸿沟对个人幸福感的影响及其在不同群体之间的变化,以及其机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the factors that influence connectedness and relationship performance with augmented reality apps Audience analytics and tensions in digital news work: evidence from Swiss news media Unraveling the dark side of ChatGPT: a moderated mediation model of technology anxiety and technostress See it, share it: what makes social media content viral in the higher education context? The power of positive affective content Behavioral dedication, constraint or obligation? A tripartite model of active participation in multiplayer online battle arena game community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1