The Power to Persuade: a study of Social Power in Human-Robot Interaction

Mojgan Hashemian, Ana Paiva, S. Mascarenhas, P. A. Santos, R. Prada
{"title":"The Power to Persuade: a study of Social Power in Human-Robot Interaction","authors":"Mojgan Hashemian, Ana Paiva, S. Mascarenhas, P. A. Santos, R. Prada","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advances on Social Robotics raise the question whether a social robot can be used as a persuasive agent. To date, a body of literature has been performed using various approaches to answer this research question, ranging from the use of non-verbal behavior to the exploration of different embodiment characteristics. In this paper, we investigate the role of social power for making social robots more persuasive. Social power is defined as one’s ability to influence another to do something which s/he would not do without the presence of such power. Different theories classify alternative ways to achieve social power, such as providing a reward, using coercion, or acting as an expert. In this work, we explored two types of persuasive strategies that are based on social power (specifically Reward and Expertise) and created two social robots that would employ such strategies. To examine the effectiveness of these strategies we performed a user study with 51 participants using two social robots in an adversarial setting in which both robots try to persuade the user on a concrete choice. The results show that even though each of the strategies caused the robots to be perceived differently in terms of their competence and warmth, both were similarly persuasive.","PeriodicalId":286478,"journal":{"name":"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Recent advances on Social Robotics raise the question whether a social robot can be used as a persuasive agent. To date, a body of literature has been performed using various approaches to answer this research question, ranging from the use of non-verbal behavior to the exploration of different embodiment characteristics. In this paper, we investigate the role of social power for making social robots more persuasive. Social power is defined as one’s ability to influence another to do something which s/he would not do without the presence of such power. Different theories classify alternative ways to achieve social power, such as providing a reward, using coercion, or acting as an expert. In this work, we explored two types of persuasive strategies that are based on social power (specifically Reward and Expertise) and created two social robots that would employ such strategies. To examine the effectiveness of these strategies we performed a user study with 51 participants using two social robots in an adversarial setting in which both robots try to persuade the user on a concrete choice. The results show that even though each of the strategies caused the robots to be perceived differently in terms of their competence and warmth, both were similarly persuasive.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
说服的力量:人机互动中的社会权力研究
社交机器人的最新进展提出了一个问题,即社交机器人是否可以用作有说服力的代理。迄今为止,已经有大量的文献使用各种方法来回答这个研究问题,从使用非语言行为到探索不同的体现特征。在本文中,我们研究了社会权力在使社交机器人更有说服力方面的作用。社会权力被定义为一个人影响另一个人去做他/她在没有这种权力的情况下不会做的事情的能力。不同的理论对获得社会权力的不同方式进行了分类,如提供奖励、使用强制手段或充当专家。在这项工作中,我们探索了两种基于社会权力的说服策略(特别是奖励和专业知识),并创造了两个使用这种策略的社交机器人。为了检验这些策略的有效性,我们对51名参与者进行了一项用户研究,使用两个社交机器人在对抗环境中,两个机器人都试图说服用户做出具体的选择。结果表明,尽管每一种策略都会让机器人在能力和热情方面产生不同的感觉,但它们都具有相似的说服力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Descriptive and Emotive Labels to Explain Human Perception of Gait Styles on a Compass Walker in Variable Contexts Communicating with SanTO – the first Catholic robot Transferring Dexterous Surgical Skill Knowledge between Robots for Semi-autonomous Teleoperation Improving Robot Transparency: An Investigation With Mobile Augmented Reality Development and Applicability of a Cable-driven Wearable Adaptive Rehabilitation Suit (WeARS)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1