Kanbay Presentation Evaluation Form: A Theoretical Study of Form Development

Y. Kanbay, H. Sarikaya, Aysun Akçam, Sevil Çınar Özbay, M. Fırat
{"title":"Kanbay Presentation Evaluation Form: A Theoretical Study of Form Development","authors":"Y. Kanbay, H. Sarikaya, Aysun Akçam, Sevil Çınar Özbay, M. Fırat","doi":"10.53424/balikesirsbd.1215528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to develop a theoretical form based on Lawshe’s method in order to evaluate the presentations in the light of scientific and objective criteria in educational environments. Materials and Methods: In this respect, literature was reviewed and a items pool was created, then a draft form was created by taking expert opinion (n: 12), and finally the trial form was re-submitted to the expert assessment (n: 25). The form was finalized by calculating the content validity ratio (CVR), content validity index (CVI) and the Fleiss Kappa coefficient. Results: In Lawshe’s method, the content validity ratio (CVR) should be at the significance level (α) = 0.05 with a minimum value of 0.44, so that the findings obtained from 25 experts can be considered valid. For this reason, CVR was calculated for each item in the trial form and all items were found to be above the required level of 0.44. In the next step, CVI was computed for the obtained 20 items, and determined as 0.88. The content validity of the form was concluded to be statistically significant since the value of CVI (0.88) was observed to be higher than CVR (0.44). Concordance between experts was examined for the reliability of the form. To this end, Cohen kappa coefficient was calculated and found to be 0.84. \nConclusion: As a result, Kanbay form which was developed to evaluate students’ presentations in educational programs in an objective and scientific way, was concluded to be statistically valid and reliable.","PeriodicalId":247163,"journal":{"name":"Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1215528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop a theoretical form based on Lawshe’s method in order to evaluate the presentations in the light of scientific and objective criteria in educational environments. Materials and Methods: In this respect, literature was reviewed and a items pool was created, then a draft form was created by taking expert opinion (n: 12), and finally the trial form was re-submitted to the expert assessment (n: 25). The form was finalized by calculating the content validity ratio (CVR), content validity index (CVI) and the Fleiss Kappa coefficient. Results: In Lawshe’s method, the content validity ratio (CVR) should be at the significance level (α) = 0.05 with a minimum value of 0.44, so that the findings obtained from 25 experts can be considered valid. For this reason, CVR was calculated for each item in the trial form and all items were found to be above the required level of 0.44. In the next step, CVI was computed for the obtained 20 items, and determined as 0.88. The content validity of the form was concluded to be statistically significant since the value of CVI (0.88) was observed to be higher than CVR (0.44). Concordance between experts was examined for the reliability of the form. To this end, Cohen kappa coefficient was calculated and found to be 0.84. Conclusion: As a result, Kanbay form which was developed to evaluate students’ presentations in educational programs in an objective and scientific way, was concluded to be statistically valid and reliable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
看贝呈现评价表:形式发展的理论研究
目的:本研究旨在建立一种基于Lawshe方法的理论形式,以便在教育环境中根据科学和客观的标准来评估报告。材料和方法:在这方面,首先查阅文献并建立项目库,然后通过征求专家意见创建表格草稿(n: 12),最后将试用表格重新提交给专家评估(n: 25)。通过计算内容效度比(CVR)、内容效度指数(CVI)和Fleiss Kappa系数,最终确定表格。结果:在Lawshe的方法中,内容效度比(CVR)必须达到显著性水平(α) = 0.05,最小值为0.44,才能认为25位专家的调查结果是有效的。因此,对试验表中各项目进行CVR计算,发现所有项目均高于0.44的要求水平。接下来,对得到的20个项目进行CVI计算,确定为0.88。CVI值(0.88)高于CVR值(0.44),故表的内容效度具有统计学意义。专家之间的一致性检验了表格的可靠性。为此,计算Cohen kappa系数为0.84。结论:所开发的Kanbay表格能够客观、科学地评价学生在教育项目中的演讲表现,在统计上是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Level of Knowledge About Child Neglect and Abuse: A University Sample eNOS Expression in the Cerebellum of Dogs Naturally Infected with Canine Distemper Virus and Realationship with Apoptosis The Relationship of Lunar Cycles with Natal and Postnatal Processes in Newborn Infants Lactate/Albumin Ratio as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever The Relationship between Passive Smoking and Caries Experience in Children Aged 1-12 Years and Influencing Factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1