Aeroelastic Modeling and Analysis of High Aspect Ratio Wings With Different Fidelity Structural Models

Gökçen Çiçek, A. Kayran
{"title":"Aeroelastic Modeling and Analysis of High Aspect Ratio Wings With Different Fidelity Structural Models","authors":"Gökçen Çiçek, A. Kayran","doi":"10.1115/imece2019-11483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper is concerned with the aeroelastic modeling and analysis of high aspect ratio wings with large torsional deflections with different fidelity structural models.\n The approach for structural modeling presented here is based on linear and nonlinear theories. The linear theories are based on the slender-straight wing and bending-torsion beam finite element formulations. The nonlinear theory is based on the nonlinear finite element model with only a torsional rotation degree of freedom to study the static aeroelastic behavior. The aerodynamic theory used for aeroelastic coupling is ESDU 95010 [1], which uses steady lifting-surface theory based on Multhopp-Richardson’s solution to provide the spanwise loading of lifting surfaces with camber and twist.\n Analyses are performed with three different structural models coupled with ESDU for simple plate-like wing models.\n The results of linear structural models are verified with MSC NASTRAN® and the nonlinear structural model results are verified with the work of Trahair [2]. Linear aeroelastic models are compared with the MSC NASTRAN® solution performed by SOL144. Significant differences in torsional deflection of tip location are observed between the linear and the nonlinear solution methodologies. The linear theory is found to be conservative for the aeroelastic analysis of high aspect ratio wings.","PeriodicalId":119220,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Advances in Aerospace Technology","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Advances in Aerospace Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2019-11483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the aeroelastic modeling and analysis of high aspect ratio wings with large torsional deflections with different fidelity structural models. The approach for structural modeling presented here is based on linear and nonlinear theories. The linear theories are based on the slender-straight wing and bending-torsion beam finite element formulations. The nonlinear theory is based on the nonlinear finite element model with only a torsional rotation degree of freedom to study the static aeroelastic behavior. The aerodynamic theory used for aeroelastic coupling is ESDU 95010 [1], which uses steady lifting-surface theory based on Multhopp-Richardson’s solution to provide the spanwise loading of lifting surfaces with camber and twist. Analyses are performed with three different structural models coupled with ESDU for simple plate-like wing models. The results of linear structural models are verified with MSC NASTRAN® and the nonlinear structural model results are verified with the work of Trahair [2]. Linear aeroelastic models are compared with the MSC NASTRAN® solution performed by SOL144. Significant differences in torsional deflection of tip location are observed between the linear and the nonlinear solution methodologies. The linear theory is found to be conservative for the aeroelastic analysis of high aspect ratio wings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同保真度结构模型大展弦比机翼气动弹性建模与分析
本文采用不同保真度的结构模型对大扭转挠度大展弦比机翼进行了气动弹性建模和分析。本文提出的结构建模方法是基于线性和非线性理论。线性理论是基于细长-直翼和弯曲-扭转梁的有限元公式。非线性理论是基于只有扭转转动自由度的非线性有限元模型来研究静力气动弹性行为。气动弹性耦合采用的气动理论为ESDU 95010[1],该理论采用基于Multhopp-Richardson解的稳态升力面理论,对具有弯曲和扭转的升力面进行展向加载。用三种不同的结构模型结合ESDU对简单的板状机翼模型进行了分析。线性结构模型的结果用MSC NASTRAN®进行了验证,非线性结构模型的结果用Trahair[2]进行了验证。线性气动弹性模型与由SOL144执行的MSC NASTRAN®解决方案进行了比较。在线性和非线性解方法之间观察到尖端位置扭转挠度的显着差异。对于大展弦比机翼的气动弹性分析,线性理论是保守的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Best Structural Theories for Free Vibrations of Sandwich Composites via Machine Learning Effect of Cryogenic Temperature Rolling on High Speed Impact Behavior of AA 6082 Thin Targets Neural Network Inverse Based Omnidirectional Rotation Decoupling Control to the Electrodynamic Reaction Sphere Structural Dynamic Testing Results for Air-Independent Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Technologies for Space Applications Effect of Shear Overloads on Crack Propagation in Al-7075 Under In-Plane Biaxial Fatigue Loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1