Giving Fish or Teaching to Fish? An Empirical Study of the Effects of Government Research and Development Policies

Kai Xu, Kuo-Feng Huang, Erming Xu
{"title":"Giving Fish or Teaching to Fish? An Empirical Study of the Effects of Government Research and Development Policies","authors":"Kai Xu, Kuo-Feng Huang, Erming Xu","doi":"10.1111/radm.12087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares how government research and development (R&D) subsidy and knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions stimulate a firm's new product development. More importantly, we emphasize that the effects of these governmental R&D policies on new product development can be achieved not only directly, but also via a mediating role – a firm's innovation capability. Furthermore, we test how other external knowledge sources (such as knowledge from universities and public research institutions) interact with government R&D support to stimulate new product development. The results, based on an investigation of 270 Chinese firms, suggest that both government R&D subsidy and knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions enhance new product development. The results also show that although government R&D subsidy and knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions has a direct impact on new product development, innovation capability does mediate the above relationships. Moreover, unlike the findings that other external knowledge sources have a direct influence on new product development as indicated by the previous literature, our findings suggest that external knowledge sources substitute with the government R&D subsidies and complement with knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions. The results confirm the old sayings that teaching to fish (knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions can complement with other external knowledge sources) is much better than giving fish (government R&D subsidies substitute other external knowledge sources). This paper enriches current literature of government R&D support policies to firm new product development by providing empirical evidences.","PeriodicalId":301403,"journal":{"name":"POL: Government Regulation (Topic)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POL: Government Regulation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

This study compares how government research and development (R&D) subsidy and knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions stimulate a firm's new product development. More importantly, we emphasize that the effects of these governmental R&D policies on new product development can be achieved not only directly, but also via a mediating role – a firm's innovation capability. Furthermore, we test how other external knowledge sources (such as knowledge from universities and public research institutions) interact with government R&D support to stimulate new product development. The results, based on an investigation of 270 Chinese firms, suggest that both government R&D subsidy and knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions enhance new product development. The results also show that although government R&D subsidy and knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions has a direct impact on new product development, innovation capability does mediate the above relationships. Moreover, unlike the findings that other external knowledge sources have a direct influence on new product development as indicated by the previous literature, our findings suggest that external knowledge sources substitute with the government R&D subsidies and complement with knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions. The results confirm the old sayings that teaching to fish (knowledge transfer from universities and public research institutions can complement with other external knowledge sources) is much better than giving fish (government R&D subsidies substitute other external knowledge sources). This paper enriches current literature of government R&D support policies to firm new product development by providing empirical evidences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
授鱼还是授鱼?政府研发政策效应的实证研究
本研究比较了政府研发补贴、大学和公共研究机构的知识转移对企业新产品开发的促进作用。更重要的是,我们强调这些政府研发政策对新产品开发的影响不仅可以直接实现,而且还可以通过企业创新能力的中介作用来实现。此外,我们还测试了其他外部知识来源(如来自大学和公共研究机构的知识)如何与政府研发支持相互作用,以刺激新产品开发。基于对270家中国企业的调查结果表明,政府研发补贴和大学和公共研究机构的知识转移都促进了新产品的开发。研究结果还表明,虽然政府研发补贴和高校及公共科研机构的知识转移对新产品开发有直接影响,但创新能力在二者之间起中介作用。此外,与以往文献认为其他外部知识来源对新产品开发有直接影响的研究结果不同,我们的研究结果表明,外部知识来源替代了政府研发补贴,并补充了大学和公共研究机构的知识转移。研究结果证实了“授鱼以教”(大学和公共研究机构的知识转移可以与其他外部知识来源互补)比“授鱼以治”(政府研发补贴可以替代其他外部知识来源)的老话。本文通过提供实证证据,丰富了现有政府研发支持政策对新产品开发的支持文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Board Structure, Payout Policy, and Performance during the Crisis: An Unintended Consequence of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Exchange Listing Rules Giving Fish or Teaching to Fish? An Empirical Study of the Effects of Government Research and Development Policies Multi-Networked Governance of Networks: Regulating Telecommunications in the United Kingdom Infrastructure Upgrades and Foreclosure with Coexistence of Service-Based and Facility-Based Firms Quasi-Judicial Mechanisms in Asian Production Networks: Archetypes for Emerging Market Strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1