Variance-Weighted Effect of Endogenous Treatment and the Estimand of Fixed-Effect Approach

Myoung‐jae Lee
{"title":"Variance-Weighted Effect of Endogenous Treatment and the Estimand of Fixed-Effect Approach","authors":"Myoung‐jae Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3908263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given an endogenous binary treatment D, an outcome Y and covariates Z, finding an instrument for D is far from easy. Instead, this paper deals with the endogeneity using two-wave (t=1,2) panel data, assuming that the endogeneity is caused by a time-constant error δ_{i}. We postulate that Y_{it} is generated by a semiparametric model with an unknown heterogeneous treatment effect μ_{D}(Z_{it}) where δ_{i} appears additively, so that δ_{i} drops out for ΔY_{i}≡Y_{i2}-Y_{i1}. The main difficulty with ΔY_{i} is that the resulting effect takes a differenced form Δμ_{D}(Z_{it}), not an additive form of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}). Despite this difficulty, however, a \"variance- (or overlap-) weighted\" average of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}) is estimated with the ordinary least squares estimator (OLS) of ΔY_{i} on the difference of the `propensity score residual', without a direct nonparametric estimation of μ_{D}(Z_{it}). Also, this finding answers an important practical question: what is estimated by the popular `fixed-effect/within-group' estimator for panel constant-effect linear models when the effect is actually not a constant? The answer is essentially the variance-weighted average of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}). Simulation and empirical studies are provided as well.","PeriodicalId":264857,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Semiparametric & Nonparametric Methods (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Semiparametric & Nonparametric Methods (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3908263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given an endogenous binary treatment D, an outcome Y and covariates Z, finding an instrument for D is far from easy. Instead, this paper deals with the endogeneity using two-wave (t=1,2) panel data, assuming that the endogeneity is caused by a time-constant error δ_{i}. We postulate that Y_{it} is generated by a semiparametric model with an unknown heterogeneous treatment effect μ_{D}(Z_{it}) where δ_{i} appears additively, so that δ_{i} drops out for ΔY_{i}≡Y_{i2}-Y_{i1}. The main difficulty with ΔY_{i} is that the resulting effect takes a differenced form Δμ_{D}(Z_{it}), not an additive form of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}). Despite this difficulty, however, a "variance- (or overlap-) weighted" average of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}) is estimated with the ordinary least squares estimator (OLS) of ΔY_{i} on the difference of the `propensity score residual', without a direct nonparametric estimation of μ_{D}(Z_{it}). Also, this finding answers an important practical question: what is estimated by the popular `fixed-effect/within-group' estimator for panel constant-effect linear models when the effect is actually not a constant? The answer is essentially the variance-weighted average of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}). Simulation and empirical studies are provided as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内源性治疗的方差加权效应与固定效应法的估计
给定内源性二元治疗D,结果Y和协变量Z,找到D的工具远非易事。相反,本文使用两波(t=1,2)面板数据处理内生性,假设内生性是由时间常数误差δ_{i}引起的。我们假设Y_{it}是由一个半参数模型生成的,该模型具有未知的非均质处理效应μ_{D}(Z_{it}),其中δ_{i}是加性出现的,因此δ_{i}对于ΔY_{i}≡Y_{i2}-Y_{i1}是不存在的。使用ΔY_{i}的主要困难在于所得到的效果采用一种差分形式Δμ_{D}(Z_{it}),而不是μ_{D}(Z_{i1})和μ_{D}(Z_{i2})的加性形式。然而,尽管存在这些困难,我们还是使用ΔY_{i}的普通最小二乘估计量(OLS)对μ_{D}(Z_{i})和μ_{D}(Z_{i})的“方差(或重叠)加权”平均值进行了估计,而无需对μ_{D}(Z_{it})进行直接的非参数估计。此外,这一发现回答了一个重要的实际问题:当效果实际上不是常数时,流行的面板恒定效应线性模型的“固定效应/组内”估计器估计了什么?答案本质上是μ_{D}(Z_{i1})和μ_{D}(Z_{i2})的方差加权平均值。并进行了仿真和实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Semiparametric Estimation of Latent Variable Asset Pricing Models Variance-Weighted Effect of Endogenous Treatment and the Estimand of Fixed-Effect Approach Semi-Nonparametric Estimation of Random Coefficient Logit Model for Aggregate Demand Accounting for Unobserved Heterogeneity in Ascending Auctions Forecasting with Bayesian Grouped Random Effects in Panel Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1