{"title":"Variance-Weighted Effect of Endogenous Treatment and the Estimand of Fixed-Effect Approach","authors":"Myoung‐jae Lee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3908263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given an endogenous binary treatment D, an outcome Y and covariates Z, finding an instrument for D is far from easy. Instead, this paper deals with the endogeneity using two-wave (t=1,2) panel data, assuming that the endogeneity is caused by a time-constant error δ_{i}. We postulate that Y_{it} is generated by a semiparametric model with an unknown heterogeneous treatment effect μ_{D}(Z_{it}) where δ_{i} appears additively, so that δ_{i} drops out for ΔY_{i}≡Y_{i2}-Y_{i1}. The main difficulty with ΔY_{i} is that the resulting effect takes a differenced form Δμ_{D}(Z_{it}), not an additive form of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}). Despite this difficulty, however, a \"variance- (or overlap-) weighted\" average of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}) is estimated with the ordinary least squares estimator (OLS) of ΔY_{i} on the difference of the `propensity score residual', without a direct nonparametric estimation of μ_{D}(Z_{it}). Also, this finding answers an important practical question: what is estimated by the popular `fixed-effect/within-group' estimator for panel constant-effect linear models when the effect is actually not a constant? The answer is essentially the variance-weighted average of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}). Simulation and empirical studies are provided as well.","PeriodicalId":264857,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Semiparametric & Nonparametric Methods (Topic)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Semiparametric & Nonparametric Methods (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3908263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given an endogenous binary treatment D, an outcome Y and covariates Z, finding an instrument for D is far from easy. Instead, this paper deals with the endogeneity using two-wave (t=1,2) panel data, assuming that the endogeneity is caused by a time-constant error δ_{i}. We postulate that Y_{it} is generated by a semiparametric model with an unknown heterogeneous treatment effect μ_{D}(Z_{it}) where δ_{i} appears additively, so that δ_{i} drops out for ΔY_{i}≡Y_{i2}-Y_{i1}. The main difficulty with ΔY_{i} is that the resulting effect takes a differenced form Δμ_{D}(Z_{it}), not an additive form of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}). Despite this difficulty, however, a "variance- (or overlap-) weighted" average of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}) is estimated with the ordinary least squares estimator (OLS) of ΔY_{i} on the difference of the `propensity score residual', without a direct nonparametric estimation of μ_{D}(Z_{it}). Also, this finding answers an important practical question: what is estimated by the popular `fixed-effect/within-group' estimator for panel constant-effect linear models when the effect is actually not a constant? The answer is essentially the variance-weighted average of μ_{D}(Z_{i1}) and μ_{D}(Z_{i2}). Simulation and empirical studies are provided as well.