The Nation's Report Card: Geography, 2001.

A. Weiss, A. Lutkus, Barbara S. Hildebrant, Matthew S. Johnson
{"title":"The Nation's Report Card: Geography, 2001.","authors":"A. Weiss, A. Lutkus, Barbara S. Hildebrant, Matthew S. Johnson","doi":"10.1037/e492172006-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2001, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) conducted a geography assessment of the nation's fourth-, eighth-, and twelfth-grade students. This report presents the results of that assessment. Results in 2001 are compared to results of 1994's NAEP geography assessment, which was the preceding NAEP geography assessment and the only other geography assessment conducted under the current framework. Students' performance on the assessment is described in terms of average scores on a 0-500 scale and of percentage of students attaining three achievement levels: (1) basic; (2) proficient; and (3) advanced. Average geography scores for fourth and eighth graders were higher in 2001 than in 1994, while the performance of twelfth graders was not significantly different. At both grades 4 and 8, score increases occurred among the lower-performing students. The 2001 assessment showed that 21% of fourth graders, 30% of eighth graders, and 25% of twelfth graders performed at or above the proficient level for their respective grades. These levels are identified as those at which all students should perform. Both grades 4 and 8 showed an increase from 1994 to 2001 in the percentage of students at or above basic. No significant changes occurred in the percentage at or above \"Proficient\" at any grade. In addition to overall results, the report provides data on the performance of various subgroups of students and information about the contexts for learning by administering questionnaires to assessed students, their teachers, and their school administrators. The report contains six chapters, each of which Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. includes extensive figures and tables. Appended are additional data and an overview of procedures used for the assessment. (BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. The Nation's Report Card: Geography, 2001 Andrew R. Weiss Anthony D. Lutkus Barbara S. Hildebrant Matthew S. Johnson In collaboration with Scott Davis Wendy S. Grigg Mei-Jang Lin Frank Jenkins Yuxin Tang National Center for Education Statistics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION x CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. E Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. 2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE National Center for Education Statistics liarlment of Office0EdQ 1.0 :of -4 /,ation NW-2002484 What is The Nation's Report Card? THE NATION'S REPORT CARD, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. Since 1969, assessments have been conducted periodically in reading, mathematics, science, writing, history, geography, and other fields. By making objective information on student performance available to policymakers at the national, state, and local levels, NAEP is an integral part of our nation's evaluation of the condition and progress of education. Only information related to academic achievement is collected under this program. NAEP guarantees the privacy of individual students and their families. NAEP is a congressionally mandated project of the National Center for Education Statistics, the U.S. Department of Education. The Commissioner of Education Statistics is responsible, by law, for carrying out the NAEP project through competitive awards to qualified organizations. NAEP reports directly to the Commissioner, who is also responsible for providing continuing reviews, including validation studies and solicitation of public comment, on NAEP's conduct and usefulness. In 1988, Congress established the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) to formulate policy guidelines for NAEP.The Board is responsible for selecting the subject areas to be assessed from among those included in the National Education Goals; for setting appropriate student performance levels; for developing assessment objectives and test specifications through a national consensus approach; for designing the assessment methodology; for developing guidelines for reporting and disseminating NAEP results; for developing standards and procedures for interstate, regional, and national comparisons; for determining the appropriateness of test items and ensuring they are free from bias; and for taking actions to improve the form and use of the National Assessment. The National Assessment Governing Board Mark D. Musick, Chair President Southern Regional Education Board Atlanta, Georgia Michael T. Nettles, Vice Chair Professor of Education University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan Melanie A. Campbell Fourth-Grade Teacher Topeka, Kansas Honorable Wilmer S. Cody Former Commissioner of Education State of Kentucky Frankfort, Kentucky Daniel A. Domenech Superintendent of Schools Fairfax County Public Schools Fairfax,Virginia Edward Donley Former Chairman Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Allentown, Pennsylvania Thomas H. Fisher Director Student Assessment Services Florida Department of Education Tallahassee, Florida Edward H. Haertel Professor, School of Education Stanford University Stanford, California Juanita Haugen Local School Board Member Pleasanton, California Honorable Dirk Kempthorne Governor of Idaho Boise, Idaho Honorable Nancy Kopp State Legislator Annapolis, Maryland Honorable Ronnie Musgrove Governor of Mississippi Jackson, Mississippi Roy M. Nageak, Sr. First Vice-Chair Alaska Board of Education and Early Development Barrow, Alaska Debra Paulson Eighth-Grade Mathematics Teacher El Paso, Texas Honorable Jo Ann Pottorff State Legislator Wichita, Kansas Diane Ravitch Research Professor New York University New York, New York Sister Lourdes Sheehan, R.S.M. Secretary for Education United States Catholic Conference Washington, DC John H. Stevens Executive 'Director Texas Business and Education Coalition Austin, Texas 4 Migdania D. Vega Principal Coral Way Elementary Bilingual School Miami, Florida Deborah Voltz Assistant Professor Department of Special Education University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky Honorable Michael E. Ward State Superintendent of Public Instruction North Carolina Public Schools Raleigh, North Carolina Marilyn A. Whirry Twelfth-Grade English Teacher Manhattan Beach, California Dennie Palmer Wolf Director, Annenberg Institute Brown University Providence, Rhode Island Grover J. Whitehurst (Ex-Officio) Assistant Secretary of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC Roy Truby Executive 'Director, NAGB Washington, DC National Center for Education Statistics The Nation's Report Card Geography 200: Andrew R. Weiss Anthony D. Lutkus Barbara S. Hildebrant Matthew S. Johnson in collaboration with Scott Davis Wendy S. Grigg Mei-Jang Lin Frank Jenkins Yuxin Tang","PeriodicalId":252919,"journal":{"name":"Education Statistics Quarterly","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Statistics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e492172006-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

In 2001, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) conducted a geography assessment of the nation's fourth-, eighth-, and twelfth-grade students. This report presents the results of that assessment. Results in 2001 are compared to results of 1994's NAEP geography assessment, which was the preceding NAEP geography assessment and the only other geography assessment conducted under the current framework. Students' performance on the assessment is described in terms of average scores on a 0-500 scale and of percentage of students attaining three achievement levels: (1) basic; (2) proficient; and (3) advanced. Average geography scores for fourth and eighth graders were higher in 2001 than in 1994, while the performance of twelfth graders was not significantly different. At both grades 4 and 8, score increases occurred among the lower-performing students. The 2001 assessment showed that 21% of fourth graders, 30% of eighth graders, and 25% of twelfth graders performed at or above the proficient level for their respective grades. These levels are identified as those at which all students should perform. Both grades 4 and 8 showed an increase from 1994 to 2001 in the percentage of students at or above basic. No significant changes occurred in the percentage at or above "Proficient" at any grade. In addition to overall results, the report provides data on the performance of various subgroups of students and information about the contexts for learning by administering questionnaires to assessed students, their teachers, and their school administrators. The report contains six chapters, each of which Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. includes extensive figures and tables. Appended are additional data and an overview of procedures used for the assessment. (BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. The Nation's Report Card: Geography, 2001 Andrew R. Weiss Anthony D. Lutkus Barbara S. Hildebrant Matthew S. Johnson In collaboration with Scott Davis Wendy S. Grigg Mei-Jang Lin Frank Jenkins Yuxin Tang National Center for Education Statistics U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION x CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. E Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. 2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE National Center for Education Statistics liarlment of Office0EdQ 1.0 :of -4 /,ation NW-2002484 What is The Nation's Report Card? THE NATION'S REPORT CARD, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. Since 1969, assessments have been conducted periodically in reading, mathematics, science, writing, history, geography, and other fields. By making objective information on student performance available to policymakers at the national, state, and local levels, NAEP is an integral part of our nation's evaluation of the condition and progress of education. Only information related to academic achievement is collected under this program. NAEP guarantees the privacy of individual students and their families. NAEP is a congressionally mandated project of the National Center for Education Statistics, the U.S. Department of Education. The Commissioner of Education Statistics is responsible, by law, for carrying out the NAEP project through competitive awards to qualified organizations. NAEP reports directly to the Commissioner, who is also responsible for providing continuing reviews, including validation studies and solicitation of public comment, on NAEP's conduct and usefulness. In 1988, Congress established the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) to formulate policy guidelines for NAEP.The Board is responsible for selecting the subject areas to be assessed from among those included in the National Education Goals; for setting appropriate student performance levels; for developing assessment objectives and test specifications through a national consensus approach; for designing the assessment methodology; for developing guidelines for reporting and disseminating NAEP results; for developing standards and procedures for interstate, regional, and national comparisons; for determining the appropriateness of test items and ensuring they are free from bias; and for taking actions to improve the form and use of the National Assessment. The National Assessment Governing Board Mark D. Musick, Chair President Southern Regional Education Board Atlanta, Georgia Michael T. Nettles, Vice Chair Professor of Education University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan Melanie A. Campbell Fourth-Grade Teacher Topeka, Kansas Honorable Wilmer S. Cody Former Commissioner of Education State of Kentucky Frankfort, Kentucky Daniel A. Domenech Superintendent of Schools Fairfax County Public Schools Fairfax,Virginia Edward Donley Former Chairman Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. Allentown, Pennsylvania Thomas H. Fisher Director Student Assessment Services Florida Department of Education Tallahassee, Florida Edward H. Haertel Professor, School of Education Stanford University Stanford, California Juanita Haugen Local School Board Member Pleasanton, California Honorable Dirk Kempthorne Governor of Idaho Boise, Idaho Honorable Nancy Kopp State Legislator Annapolis, Maryland Honorable Ronnie Musgrove Governor of Mississippi Jackson, Mississippi Roy M. Nageak, Sr. First Vice-Chair Alaska Board of Education and Early Development Barrow, Alaska Debra Paulson Eighth-Grade Mathematics Teacher El Paso, Texas Honorable Jo Ann Pottorff State Legislator Wichita, Kansas Diane Ravitch Research Professor New York University New York, New York Sister Lourdes Sheehan, R.S.M. Secretary for Education United States Catholic Conference Washington, DC John H. Stevens Executive 'Director Texas Business and Education Coalition Austin, Texas 4 Migdania D. Vega Principal Coral Way Elementary Bilingual School Miami, Florida Deborah Voltz Assistant Professor Department of Special Education University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky Honorable Michael E. Ward State Superintendent of Public Instruction North Carolina Public Schools Raleigh, North Carolina Marilyn A. Whirry Twelfth-Grade English Teacher Manhattan Beach, California Dennie Palmer Wolf Director, Annenberg Institute Brown University Providence, Rhode Island Grover J. Whitehurst (Ex-Officio) Assistant Secretary of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC Roy Truby Executive 'Director, NAGB Washington, DC National Center for Education Statistics The Nation's Report Card Geography 200: Andrew R. Weiss Anthony D. Lutkus Barbara S. Hildebrant Matthew S. Johnson in collaboration with Scott Davis Wendy S. Grigg Mei-Jang Lin Frank Jenkins Yuxin Tang
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家报告卡:地理,2001。
2001年,国家教育进步评估(NAEP)对全国四年级、八年级和十二年级学生进行了地理评估。本报告介绍了这项评估的结果。二零零一年的结果是与一九九四年的地理评估结果作比较。一九九四年的地理评估是上一次的地理评估,也是在现行框架下进行的唯一一次地理评估。学生在评估中的表现以0-500分的平均分和达到三个成绩水平的学生百分比来描述:(1)基本;(2)熟练;(3)先进。2001年四年级和八年级学生的地理平均分高于1994年,而十二年级学生的地理平均分差异不显著。在四年级和八年级,成绩较差的学生得分都有所提高。2001年的评估显示,21%的四年级学生、30%的八年级学生和25%的十二年级学生在各自年级的表现达到或超过熟练水平。这些水平被确定为所有学生应该达到的水平。从1994年至2001年,四年级和八年级的学生在基础或以上程度的百分比均有所增加。在任何年级,“精通”或“精通”以上的百分比没有显著变化。除了总体结果外,该报告还提供了各学生分组的表现数据,并通过对被评估学生、教师和学校管理人员进行问卷调查,提供了有关学习环境的信息。该报告包含六章,每一章都是由EDRS提供的从原始文件中可以得到的最好的复制品。包括大量的数字和表格。附加的是额外的数据和用于评估的程序概述。(BT) EDRS提供的复制件是由原始文件制作的最好的复制件。国家报告卡:地理,2001年安德鲁·r·韦斯安东尼·d·卢特库斯芭芭拉·s·希尔德布兰特马修·s·约翰逊与斯科特·戴维斯合作温迪·s·格里格林美江弗兰克·詹金斯唐玉欣国家教育统计中心美国教育部教育研究和改进办公室教育资源信息中心(ERIC)本文件已从原始文件的个人或组织处得到复制。本文件中陈述的观点或意见不一定代表OERI的官方立场或政策。美国国家教育统计中心办公室统计报告0edq1.0:of -4 /, Nation NW-2002484什么是美国的成绩单?国家报告卡,即国家教育进步评估(NAEP),是唯一具有全国代表性的持续评估美国学生在各个学科领域的知识和能力。自1969年以来,在阅读、数学、科学、写作、历史、地理和其他领域定期进行评估。通过向国家、州和地方各级的决策者提供有关学生表现的客观信息,NAEP是我国评估教育状况和进步的一个组成部分。此计划只收集与学业成绩有关的信息。NAEP保证学生个人及其家庭的隐私。NAEP是美国教育部国家教育统计中心的一个国会授权项目。根据法律,教育统计专员负责通过对合格组织的竞争性奖励来实施NAEP项目。NAEP直接向专员报告,专员还负责就NAEP的行为和有效性提供持续的审查,包括验证研究和征求公众意见。1988年,国会成立了国家评估管理委员会(NAGB),为NAEP制定政策指导方针。委员会负责从列入国家教育目标的学科领域中选择要评估的学科领域;设定适当的学生表现水平;通过全国协商一致的方法制定评估目标和测试规范;设计评估方法;制定报告和传播国家环境评估结果的准则;制定州际、地区和国家比较的标准和程序;确定测试项目的适当性并确保其无偏差;并采取行动改进国家评估的形式和使用。美国国家评估管理委员会主席Mark D. Musick,乔治亚州亚特兰大南部地区教育委员会主席Michael T. Nettles,密歇根州安娜堡市密歇根大学教育副主席教授Melanie A。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Schools' Use of Assessments for Kindergarten Entrance and Placement: 1998-99 Young Children's Access to Computers in the Home and at School in 1999 and 2000. Invited Commentary: First Publications from the Schools and Staffing Survey, 1999-2000. Characteristics of the 100 Largest Public Elementary and Secondary School Districts in the United States: 2000-01. The Nation's Report Card: Geography, 2001.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1