The modernist fallacy in homosexual selection theories: Homosexual and homosocial exaptation in South Asian society

M. Ross, Alan L. Wells
{"title":"The modernist fallacy in homosexual selection theories: Homosexual and homosocial exaptation in South Asian society","authors":"M. Ross, Alan L. Wells","doi":"10.1080/14616660010024580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We argue that explanations of homosexual function in evolution have often been based on homosexual organization in Western societies and on modern homosexual subcultures. We suggest that if homosexual behaviour in humans did evolve in the past 3 million years of human development, we must seek its origin in the conditions of human organization of such times. Indian village society is one model that is available for examining homosexual exaptation. Here, homosexual behaviour is based on ability to have sex with males as well as with females, and marriage is related to family and social organization rather than sex. In such a system, sexual contact between males would have the advantages of promoting homosocial bonds in a male-dominated society, and of reducing rivalry over females. It may also have the advantage of providing acceptable sexual outlets given higher sexual drive or earlier sexual maturity in males. Thus, one explanation for the evolutionary development of homosexual behaviour is that it is an...","PeriodicalId":280659,"journal":{"name":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology, Evolution & Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616660010024580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

We argue that explanations of homosexual function in evolution have often been based on homosexual organization in Western societies and on modern homosexual subcultures. We suggest that if homosexual behaviour in humans did evolve in the past 3 million years of human development, we must seek its origin in the conditions of human organization of such times. Indian village society is one model that is available for examining homosexual exaptation. Here, homosexual behaviour is based on ability to have sex with males as well as with females, and marriage is related to family and social organization rather than sex. In such a system, sexual contact between males would have the advantages of promoting homosocial bonds in a male-dominated society, and of reducing rivalry over females. It may also have the advantage of providing acceptable sexual outlets given higher sexual drive or earlier sexual maturity in males. Thus, one explanation for the evolutionary development of homosexual behaviour is that it is an...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同性恋选择理论中的现代主义谬误:南亚社会的同性恋与同性恋社会排斥
我们认为,对进化中同性恋功能的解释往往是基于西方社会的同性恋组织和现代同性恋亚文化。我们认为,如果人类的同性恋行为确实是在过去300万年的人类发展过程中进化出来的,那么我们必须在那个时代的人类组织条件中寻找它的起源。印度的乡村社会是一个可以用来检验同性恋排斥的模式。在这里,同性恋行为是基于与男性和女性发生性行为的能力,婚姻与家庭和社会组织有关,而不是与性有关。在这样一个系统中,男性之间的性接触在男性主导的社会中具有促进同性社会关系的优势,并减少对女性的竞争。由于男性的性欲较强或性成熟较早,它也可能具有提供可接受的性出口的优势。因此,对同性恋行为进化发展的一种解释是,它是一种……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rape and evolution: A Reply to our critics Perceptions of sexual harassment: An evolutionary perspective A defence of evolutionary psychology: Reply to Gannon THE ACCEPTABLE FACE OF PARENTHOOD: THE RELATIVE STATUS OF BIOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL INTERPRETATIONS OF OFFSPRING IN INFERTILITY TREATMENT Etiology of male sexual orientation in an Australian twin sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1