Blue Is the New Black (Market): Privacy Leaks and Re-Victimization from Police-Auctioned Cellphones

Richard Roberts, J. Poveda, Raley Roberts, Dave Levin
{"title":"Blue Is the New Black (Market): Privacy Leaks and Re-Victimization from Police-Auctioned Cellphones","authors":"Richard Roberts, J. Poveda, Raley Roberts, Dave Levin","doi":"10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, items in police possession are often sold at auction if they are not claimed. This includes cellphones that the police obtained through civil asset forfeiture, that were stolen, or that were turned in to lost-and-found. Thousands of US police departments partner with a website, PropertyRoom, to auction their items. Over the course of several months, we purchased 228 cellphones from PropertyRoom to ascertain whether they contained personal information. Our results show that a shocking amount of sensitive, personal information is easily accessible, even to a \"low-effort\" adversary with no forensics expertise: 21.5% of the phones we purchased were not locked at all, another 4.8% used top-40 most common PINs and patterns, and one phone had a sticky-note from the police with the PIN on it. We analyze the content on the 61 phones we could access, finding sensitive information about not only the phones’ previous owners, but also about their personal contacts, and in some cases, about victims of those persons’ crimes. Additionally, we analyze approximately two years of PropertyRoom cellphone auctions, finding multiple instances of identifying information in photos of the items being auctioned, including sticky-notes with PINs, owners’ names and phone numbers, and evidence stickers that reveal how the phones were obtained and the names of the officers who obtained them. Our work shows that police procedures and phone auctions can be a significant source of personal information leakage and re-victimization. We hope that our work is a call to arms to enforce new policies that either prohibit the selling of computing devices containing user information, or at the very least impose requirements to wipe phones in a manner that the US federal government already employs.","PeriodicalId":439989,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP46215.2023.10179348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the United States, items in police possession are often sold at auction if they are not claimed. This includes cellphones that the police obtained through civil asset forfeiture, that were stolen, or that were turned in to lost-and-found. Thousands of US police departments partner with a website, PropertyRoom, to auction their items. Over the course of several months, we purchased 228 cellphones from PropertyRoom to ascertain whether they contained personal information. Our results show that a shocking amount of sensitive, personal information is easily accessible, even to a "low-effort" adversary with no forensics expertise: 21.5% of the phones we purchased were not locked at all, another 4.8% used top-40 most common PINs and patterns, and one phone had a sticky-note from the police with the PIN on it. We analyze the content on the 61 phones we could access, finding sensitive information about not only the phones’ previous owners, but also about their personal contacts, and in some cases, about victims of those persons’ crimes. Additionally, we analyze approximately two years of PropertyRoom cellphone auctions, finding multiple instances of identifying information in photos of the items being auctioned, including sticky-notes with PINs, owners’ names and phone numbers, and evidence stickers that reveal how the phones were obtained and the names of the officers who obtained them. Our work shows that police procedures and phone auctions can be a significant source of personal information leakage and re-victimization. We hope that our work is a call to arms to enforce new policies that either prohibit the selling of computing devices containing user information, or at the very least impose requirements to wipe phones in a manner that the US federal government already employs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蓝色是新的黑色(市场):隐私泄露和再次受害的警察拍卖手机
在美国,警方持有的物品如果无人认领,通常会被拍卖。这包括警方通过没收民事财产获得的手机,被盗的手机,或者被交给失物招领处的手机。成千上万的美国警察部门与PropertyRoom网站合作,拍卖他们的物品。在几个月的时间里,我们从PropertyRoom购买了228部手机,以确定它们是否包含个人信息。我们的研究结果显示,大量敏感的个人信息很容易被获取,即使是没有取证专业知识的“低难度”对手也能轻易获取:我们购买的21.5%的手机根本没有上锁,另外4.8%的手机使用了前40名最常见的密码和模式,还有一部手机上贴着警方提供的密码贴纸。我们分析了可以访问的61部手机的内容,不仅找到了这些手机的前主人的敏感信息,还找到了他们的私人联系人,在某些情况下,还找到了这些人犯罪的受害者的敏感信息。此外,我们分析了PropertyRoom大约两年的手机拍卖,在拍卖物品的照片中发现了多个识别信息的实例,包括带有pin码、所有者姓名和电话号码的贴纸,以及显示手机获取方式和获取人员姓名的证据贴纸。我们的研究表明,警察程序和电话拍卖可能是个人信息泄露和再次受害的重要来源。我们希望我们的工作是对执行新政策的呼吁,这些政策要么禁止销售包含用户信息的计算设备,要么至少要求以美国联邦政府已经采用的方式清除手机数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TeSec: Accurate Server-side Attack Investigation for Web Applications PLA-LiDAR: Physical Laser Attacks against LiDAR-based 3D Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicle One Key to Rule Them All: Secure Group Pairing for Heterogeneous IoT Devices SoK: Cryptographic Neural-Network Computation SoK: A Critical Evaluation of Efficient Website Fingerprinting Defenses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1