Evolution of the Plays: Event and Structure of Chekhov's Plays “The Wood Demon” and “Uncle Vanya”

Yong Sik Paik
{"title":"Evolution of the Plays: Event and Structure of Chekhov's Plays “The Wood Demon” and “Uncle Vanya”","authors":"Yong Sik Paik","doi":"10.24958/rh.2023.27.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chekhov's play “The Wood Demon” was written in 1889, and was adapted as “Uncle Vanya” in 1896. This study compares the event and structure of the two works, explores the compositional causes that made the differences between the two plays, and identifies the evolution of Chekhov's playwriting and its aesthetic characteristics. \nWhen writing “The Wood Demon”, Chekhov took a critical attitude towards the conventions of contemporary theater. He thought it inappropriate to show dramatic events on stage, which belong to exceptional phenomena in everyday life. On the other hand, he was of the opinion that theater should express aspects of real life, in which various human emotions are revealed. To represent real life instead of dramatic events in his plays, Chekhov had to create a new form of his play. His attempt resulted in the creation of “The Wood Demon”, which could not be positively evaluated in the world of contemporary theater. \n“The Wood Demon” is a play with a dual structure in which daily life in the countryside and the motif of love coexist: The expression of daily life hinders the dramatic development of events, and the events reduce the space for detailed description and presentation of social aspects. Chekhov tried to create a play with a new aesthetic, but contemporary critics only saw the absence of traditional conventions instead of something new in his play. His intention to add novelty to the play turned out to be a failure. He was neither faithful to the existing theatrical technique nor completely abandoned it. His comedy “The Wood Demon” ended up being an eclectic work of the new and the old. \nThe adaptation of “The Wood Demon” made it possible for Chekhov to completely get out of the traditional theatrical technique centered on dramatic development of events and create a play “Uncle Vanya” with the new conventions and form. The genre of the new play became ‘scene’, and instead of ‘the event of Love’, ‘the event of Arrival and Departure’ became the center of the content. \nIf the unity of time and space was maintained in “The Wood Demon”, Chekhov gave up temporal structuring and chose spatial structuring in the play “Uncle Vanya”. As a result, the new play shows various aspects of a space, not the causal flow of events: Fragmentary words and actions with weak causality become the content of each act. While “The Wood Demon” is built on the time structure and maintains the causality, consistency, and sequentiality of time, “Uncle Vanya” uses space instead of time as the compositional principle of the play, opening a new horizon for theater.","PeriodicalId":431674,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Russian and Altaic Studies Chungbuk University","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Russian and Altaic Studies Chungbuk University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24958/rh.2023.27.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chekhov's play “The Wood Demon” was written in 1889, and was adapted as “Uncle Vanya” in 1896. This study compares the event and structure of the two works, explores the compositional causes that made the differences between the two plays, and identifies the evolution of Chekhov's playwriting and its aesthetic characteristics. When writing “The Wood Demon”, Chekhov took a critical attitude towards the conventions of contemporary theater. He thought it inappropriate to show dramatic events on stage, which belong to exceptional phenomena in everyday life. On the other hand, he was of the opinion that theater should express aspects of real life, in which various human emotions are revealed. To represent real life instead of dramatic events in his plays, Chekhov had to create a new form of his play. His attempt resulted in the creation of “The Wood Demon”, which could not be positively evaluated in the world of contemporary theater. “The Wood Demon” is a play with a dual structure in which daily life in the countryside and the motif of love coexist: The expression of daily life hinders the dramatic development of events, and the events reduce the space for detailed description and presentation of social aspects. Chekhov tried to create a play with a new aesthetic, but contemporary critics only saw the absence of traditional conventions instead of something new in his play. His intention to add novelty to the play turned out to be a failure. He was neither faithful to the existing theatrical technique nor completely abandoned it. His comedy “The Wood Demon” ended up being an eclectic work of the new and the old. The adaptation of “The Wood Demon” made it possible for Chekhov to completely get out of the traditional theatrical technique centered on dramatic development of events and create a play “Uncle Vanya” with the new conventions and form. The genre of the new play became ‘scene’, and instead of ‘the event of Love’, ‘the event of Arrival and Departure’ became the center of the content. If the unity of time and space was maintained in “The Wood Demon”, Chekhov gave up temporal structuring and chose spatial structuring in the play “Uncle Vanya”. As a result, the new play shows various aspects of a space, not the causal flow of events: Fragmentary words and actions with weak causality become the content of each act. While “The Wood Demon” is built on the time structure and maintains the causality, consistency, and sequentiality of time, “Uncle Vanya” uses space instead of time as the compositional principle of the play, opening a new horizon for theater.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戏剧的演变:契诃夫戏剧《木妖》与《万尼亚叔叔》的事件与结构
契诃夫的戏剧《木妖》写于1889年,1896年被改编为《万尼亚叔叔》。本文对两部作品的事件和结构进行了比较,探讨了两部作品差异的构成原因,并确定了契诃夫剧本创作的演变及其美学特征。在创作《木妖》时,契诃夫对当代戏剧的传统持批判态度。他认为在舞台上表现戏剧事件是不合适的,因为这属于日常生活中的特殊现象。另一方面,他认为戏剧应该表现现实生活的方方面面,在现实生活中,人类的各种情感得以展现。为了在他的戏剧中表现现实生活而不是戏剧事件,契诃夫不得不创造一种新的戏剧形式。他的尝试导致了《木妖》的创作,在当代戏剧界没有得到正面评价。《木妖》是一部乡村日常生活与爱情母题并存的双重结构的戏剧:日常生活的表达阻碍了事件的戏剧性发展,事件减少了对社会方面的详细描写和呈现的空间。契诃夫试图创造一种新美学的戏剧,但当代评论家只看到了传统习俗的缺失,而没有看到新的东西。他想给这出戏增添新意的打算失败了。他既不忠实于现存的戏剧技巧,也不完全抛弃它。他的喜剧《木妖》最终成为一部新旧兼收并蓄的作品。《木妖》的改编使契诃夫彻底摆脱了以事件戏剧性发展为中心的传统戏剧手法,创作出了具有新惯例和新形式的《万尼亚叔叔》。新剧的体裁变成了“场景”,“到达与离开”事件取代了“爱的事件”,成为了内容的中心。如果说《木妖》中保持了时空的统一性,契诃夫在《万尼亚叔叔》中放弃了时间结构而选择了空间结构。因此,新剧表现的是一个空间的各个方面,而不是事件的因果流动:零碎的、因果关系较弱的言语和动作成为每一幕的内容。《木妖》以时间结构为基础,保持时间的因果性、一致性和顺序性,而《万尼亚大叔》则以空间代替时间作为剧本的构图原则,为戏剧开辟了新的视野。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
(South) Korean Media Perceptions of Central Asia from the 1920s to the 1980s A Narrative Analysis of A. Bely’s “Petersburg” Identity Restoration Project in Novaya Drama: Focusing on Representation of Narrative Self in I. Vyrypaev’s drama Festival as a Diaspora Cultural Network: a Focus on the Buryat Altargana The Acoustic Image of the Begging of the 20th Century in I. Grekova Novels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1