A Comparison of Handcrafted and Deep Neural Network Feature Extraction for Classifying Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Images

Kuntoro Adi Nugroho
{"title":"A Comparison of Handcrafted and Deep Neural Network Feature Extraction for Classifying Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Images","authors":"Kuntoro Adi Nugroho","doi":"10.1109/ICICOS.2018.8621687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optical Coherence Tomography allows ophthalmologist to obtain cross-section imaging of eye retina. Assisted with digital image analysis methods, effective disease detection could be performed. Various methods exist to extract feature from OCT images. The proposed study aims to compare the effectiveness of handcrafted and deep neural network features. The dataset consists of 32339 instances which are distributed in four classes. The feature extractors are Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG), Local Binary Pattern (LBP), DenseNet-169, and ResNet50. As a result, the deep neural network based methods outperformed the handcrafted feature with 88% and 89% accuracy for DenseNet and ResNet compared to 50 % and 42 % for HOG and LBP respectively. The deep neural network based methods also demonstrated better result on the under represented classes.","PeriodicalId":438473,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICOS.2018.8621687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Optical Coherence Tomography allows ophthalmologist to obtain cross-section imaging of eye retina. Assisted with digital image analysis methods, effective disease detection could be performed. Various methods exist to extract feature from OCT images. The proposed study aims to compare the effectiveness of handcrafted and deep neural network features. The dataset consists of 32339 instances which are distributed in four classes. The feature extractors are Histogram of Oriented Gradient (HOG), Local Binary Pattern (LBP), DenseNet-169, and ResNet50. As a result, the deep neural network based methods outperformed the handcrafted feature with 88% and 89% accuracy for DenseNet and ResNet compared to 50 % and 42 % for HOG and LBP respectively. The deep neural network based methods also demonstrated better result on the under represented classes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手工与深度神经网络特征提取在光学相干断层扫描(OCT)图像分类中的比较
光学相干断层扫描允许眼科医生获得眼睛视网膜的横切面成像。借助数字图像分析方法,可以进行有效的疾病检测。从OCT图像中提取特征的方法多种多样。本研究旨在比较手工和深度神经网络特征的有效性。数据集由32339个实例组成,分布在四个类中。特征提取器有直方图定向梯度(HOG)、局部二值模式(LBP)、DenseNet-169和ResNet50。结果,基于深度神经网络的方法在DenseNet和ResNet上的准确率分别为88%和89%,优于手工特征,而HOG和LBP的准确率分别为50%和42%。基于深度神经网络的方法在表示不足的类上也表现出较好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing Website E-Learning Based on Integration of Technology Enhance Learning and Human Computer Interaction Copyright A Distributional Model of Sensitive Values on p-Sensitive in Multiple Sensitive Attributes Real-time Detection of Data Completeness Degree for Traffic Simulation Using Text Similarity and Time Relevance of Data from Social Media Implementation of e-New Local Search based Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm and Multiobjective Co-variance based Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm in Stocks Portfolio Optimization Problem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1