Duzentos anos de reformas administrativas em Portugal e em Espanha: da administração patrimonialista à gestionária

Leonardo Secchi, Joaquim Manuel Croca Caeiro, Ricardo Ramos Pinto
{"title":"Duzentos anos de reformas administrativas em Portugal e em Espanha: da administração patrimonialista à gestionária","authors":"Leonardo Secchi, Joaquim Manuel Croca Caeiro, Ricardo Ramos Pinto","doi":"10.33167/2184-0644.cpp2022.8.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this essay is to compare the administrative reforms that took place in the national governments of Portugal and Spain. The dimensions of analysis are: the doctrines of the reforms, their justifications and their underlying values; the policy leadership, its implementation styles and instruments; the external induction and the resistances to change. The observed transition landmarks are: the patrimonialist transition, the bureaucratic transition and the managerial transition. We carried out a literature review on public management paradigms and administrative reforms in Portugal and Spain, in addition to consulting official documents of the two national governments. As conclusions, some similarities were identified between the reform processes regarding the contents of the reforms and their underlying values and justifications, and the preference for the legal instrument of policy change (laws, decrees, regulations), as well as the leadership and implementation style. Regarding the differences, Portugal is perceived as more permeable to external induction than Spain. Comparing the transition processes, recent managerial reforms have relied on networked policy entrepreneurs, using a variety of instruments (in addition to legislative change), a pattern visibly modified after the redemocratization and after Portugal and Spain joined the European Union.","PeriodicalId":134845,"journal":{"name":"Ciências e Políticas Públicas / Public Sciences & Policies","volume":"71 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciências e Políticas Públicas / Public Sciences & Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-0644.cpp2022.8.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this essay is to compare the administrative reforms that took place in the national governments of Portugal and Spain. The dimensions of analysis are: the doctrines of the reforms, their justifications and their underlying values; the policy leadership, its implementation styles and instruments; the external induction and the resistances to change. The observed transition landmarks are: the patrimonialist transition, the bureaucratic transition and the managerial transition. We carried out a literature review on public management paradigms and administrative reforms in Portugal and Spain, in addition to consulting official documents of the two national governments. As conclusions, some similarities were identified between the reform processes regarding the contents of the reforms and their underlying values and justifications, and the preference for the legal instrument of policy change (laws, decrees, regulations), as well as the leadership and implementation style. Regarding the differences, Portugal is perceived as more permeable to external induction than Spain. Comparing the transition processes, recent managerial reforms have relied on networked policy entrepreneurs, using a variety of instruments (in addition to legislative change), a pattern visibly modified after the redemocratization and after Portugal and Spain joined the European Union.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙和西班牙两百年的行政改革:从世袭管理到管理
这篇文章的目的是比较行政改革,发生在葡萄牙和西班牙的国家政府。分析的维度是:改革的理论、理由和潜在价值;政策领导、执行方式和手段;外部感应和电阻的变化。观察到的转型标志是:世袭主义转型、官僚主义转型和管理转型。除了查阅两国政府的官方文件外,我们还对葡萄牙和西班牙的公共管理范式和行政改革进行了文献回顾。作为结论,在改革的内容及其基本价值和理由方面的改革进程与对政策变化的法律工具(法律、法令、条例)的偏好以及领导和执行风格之间确定了一些相似之处。在差异方面,葡萄牙被认为比西班牙更容易接受外部诱导。与转型过程相比,最近的管理改革依赖于网络化的政策企业家,使用各种工具(除了立法改革),这种模式在再民主化和葡萄牙和西班牙加入欧盟后明显改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public Arena on the internet in defense of the public university in Brazil: Strategies of #UERJResiste The protagonism of local populations in the Mariana and Brumadinho crises in the national and regional press Communicating climate change and energy in rural Africa: A case analysis to explain how participatory communication can support transition to renewables and adoption of solar technologies in rural Africa Arena pública na internet em defesa da universidade pública no Brasil: Estratégias de #UERJResiste O protagonismo das populações locais nas crises de Mariana e Brumadinho na imprensa nacional e regional
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1