Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Oncological Drugs Newly Marketed in Italy

Nicoletta Martone, C. Lucioni, S. Mazzi, V. Fadda
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Oncological Drugs Newly Marketed in Italy","authors":"Nicoletta Martone, C. Lucioni, S. Mazzi, V. Fadda","doi":"10.5301/GRHTA.5000182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a previous publication, the incremental overall survival (OS gain vs current therapy) was estimated for the 32 new cancer therapies authorized in Italy between 2010 and 2013.The objective of this article was to quantify the respective incremental costs (including possible regulatory agreements) in order to build incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to be used for economic evaluation.In a first group of 12 therapies, where OS gains were statistically significant (p < 0.05), the ICERs' median value was €53,273 per year gained (range: 3,945 - 179,098) and the mean value was €64,181 (95% CI: 29,302 - 99,060). In the other group, excluding four therapies with negative OS gains, ICERs were calculated for the remaining 16 drugs. The median ICER resulted in €69,568 (range: 3,406 - 308,928) and the mean value was €87,330 (95% CI: 37,024 - 137,636).Assuming a threshold of €5,000 per life-month gained, a total of 14 new cancer therapies met this criterion of economic acceptability (eight out of 12 in the...","PeriodicalId":228031,"journal":{"name":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/GRHTA.5000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In a previous publication, the incremental overall survival (OS gain vs current therapy) was estimated for the 32 new cancer therapies authorized in Italy between 2010 and 2013.The objective of this article was to quantify the respective incremental costs (including possible regulatory agreements) in order to build incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to be used for economic evaluation.In a first group of 12 therapies, where OS gains were statistically significant (p < 0.05), the ICERs' median value was €53,273 per year gained (range: 3,945 - 179,098) and the mean value was €64,181 (95% CI: 29,302 - 99,060). In the other group, excluding four therapies with negative OS gains, ICERs were calculated for the remaining 16 drugs. The median ICER resulted in €69,568 (range: 3,406 - 308,928) and the mean value was €87,330 (95% CI: 37,024 - 137,636).Assuming a threshold of €5,000 per life-month gained, a total of 14 new cancer therapies met this criterion of economic acceptability (eight out of 12 in the...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利新上市肿瘤药物的成本-效果评价
在之前的一篇文章中,对2010年至2013年间意大利批准的32种新癌症疗法的增量总生存期(OS增益与当前治疗相比)进行了估计。本文的目的是量化各自的增量成本(包括可能的监管协议),以便建立用于经济评估的增量成本效益比(ICERs)。在第一组12种治疗中,OS收益具有统计学意义(p < 0.05), ICERs的中位值为每年获得53,273欧元(范围:3,945 - 179,098),平均值为64,181欧元(95% CI: 29,302 - 99,060)。在另一组中,排除4种具有负OS收益的疗法,计算其余16种药物的ICERs。ICER的中位数为69,568欧元(范围:3,406 - 308,928),平均值为87,330欧元(95% CI: 37,024 - 137,636)。假设每个生命月增加5000欧元的门槛,总共有14种新的癌症治疗方法符合经济可接受性的标准(在…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The economic impact of 14 compassionate use programs for medicines in Italy, in the perspective of the National Health Service Heart failure and economic impact: an analysis in real clinical practice in Italy A pharmacoeconomic analysis from Italian guidelines for the management of prolactinomas New organizational and governance strategies in the management of epilepsy in Italy Personalized support programs with innovative digital tools to manage and monitor patients suffering from epilepsy: EpiOnApp case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1