The economic impact of 14 compassionate use programs for medicines in Italy, in the perspective of the National Health Service

Claudio Jommi, Federico Pantellini, Giovanni Giuliani, M. Cavazza
{"title":"The economic impact of 14 compassionate use programs for medicines in Italy, in the perspective of the National Health Service","authors":"Claudio Jommi, Federico Pantellini, Giovanni Giuliani, M. Cavazza","doi":"10.33393/grhta.2024.2735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Compassionate use programs (CUP) for medicines allow patients, not recruited in trials, accessing medicines before marketing approval. The evidence on the economic impact of CUP is limited to one paper that did not include the possible long-term economic impact of medicines used in CUP compared to alternative treatments, like avoided hospitalization costs. This paper aims at covering this information gap, updating and integrating the existing evidence, with a cost analysis in the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (SSN).\nMethods: Data were retrieved from the Roche CUP Database, the peer-reviewed literature (e.g. published cost-effectiveness studies, if any), the gray literature (e.g. regional documents for the alternative treatment cost) and unpublished data (e.g. cost-effectiveness analysis provided for price and reimbursement negotiation for medicines in CUP).\nResults: We retrieved data from 14 CUPs and 3,485 patients (70% affected by tumors) (Jan 2015-August 2022). The alternative treatment mean cost per patient ranged from € 11.1 k to € 18.8 k. The net economic benefit ranged from € 47 million to € 75 million (€ 13.5 k-€ 21.5 k per patient). Avoiding alternative treatments mostly contributes to the economic benefit. The long-term economic impact accounted for 20/30% of the net economic impact. The net economic benefit for cancer drugs ranged from € 12.6 million to € 40.0 million.\nConclusions: Despite research limitations, this paper provides additional evidence on the economic impact of CUP in Italy. This could represent the first step of a broader analysis of the economic impact of early access schemes for drugs.","PeriodicalId":228031,"journal":{"name":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"67 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2024.2735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compassionate use programs (CUP) for medicines allow patients, not recruited in trials, accessing medicines before marketing approval. The evidence on the economic impact of CUP is limited to one paper that did not include the possible long-term economic impact of medicines used in CUP compared to alternative treatments, like avoided hospitalization costs. This paper aims at covering this information gap, updating and integrating the existing evidence, with a cost analysis in the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (SSN). Methods: Data were retrieved from the Roche CUP Database, the peer-reviewed literature (e.g. published cost-effectiveness studies, if any), the gray literature (e.g. regional documents for the alternative treatment cost) and unpublished data (e.g. cost-effectiveness analysis provided for price and reimbursement negotiation for medicines in CUP). Results: We retrieved data from 14 CUPs and 3,485 patients (70% affected by tumors) (Jan 2015-August 2022). The alternative treatment mean cost per patient ranged from € 11.1 k to € 18.8 k. The net economic benefit ranged from € 47 million to € 75 million (€ 13.5 k-€ 21.5 k per patient). Avoiding alternative treatments mostly contributes to the economic benefit. The long-term economic impact accounted for 20/30% of the net economic impact. The net economic benefit for cancer drugs ranged from € 12.6 million to € 40.0 million. Conclusions: Despite research limitations, this paper provides additional evidence on the economic impact of CUP in Italy. This could represent the first step of a broader analysis of the economic impact of early access schemes for drugs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从国民健康服务的角度看意大利 14 项药品同情使用计划的经济影响
背景:药品的同情使用计划(CUP)允许未被试验招募的患者在药品获准上市前使用药品。有关银联对经济影响的证据仅限于一篇论文,其中并未包括银联用药与替代治疗相比可能产生的长期经济影响,如避免的住院费用。本文旨在填补这一信息空白,更新和整合现有证据,并从意大利国家卫生服务机构(SSN)的角度进行成本分析:从罗氏银联数据库、同行评议文献(如已发表的成本效益研究)、灰色文献(如替代治疗成本的地区文件)和未发表的数据(如为银联药物价格和报销谈判提供的成本效益分析)中检索数据:我们检索了 14 个 CUP 和 3485 名患者(70% 患有肿瘤)(2015 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月)的数据。每位患者的替代治疗平均成本从 11.1 千欧元到 18.8 千欧元不等,净经济效益从 4700 万欧元到 7500 万欧元不等(每位患者 13.5 千欧元到 21.5 千欧元)。避免替代治疗是经济效益的主要来源。长期经济影响占净经济影响的 20/30%。抗癌药物的净经济效益从 1260 万欧元到 4000 万欧元不等:尽管研究存在局限性,但本文提供了更多证据,说明了 CUP 在意大利的经济影响。这可能是对药物早期使用计划的经济影响进行更广泛分析的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The economic impact of 14 compassionate use programs for medicines in Italy, in the perspective of the National Health Service Heart failure and economic impact: an analysis in real clinical practice in Italy A pharmacoeconomic analysis from Italian guidelines for the management of prolactinomas New organizational and governance strategies in the management of epilepsy in Italy Personalized support programs with innovative digital tools to manage and monitor patients suffering from epilepsy: EpiOnApp case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1