Heart failure and economic impact: an analysis in real clinical practice in Italy

Melania Dovizio, Melania Leogrande, Luca Degli Esposti
{"title":"Heart failure and economic impact: an analysis in real clinical practice in Italy","authors":"Melania Dovizio, Melania Leogrande, Luca Degli Esposti","doi":"10.33393/grhta.2024.3013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Heart failure (HF) affects 1% of subjects aged 45-55 and over 10% of subjects aged ≥ 80 and in Italy represents the third leading cause of hospitalization.\nObjective: To analyse the clinical and economic burden of HF in the Italian real clinical practice.\nMethods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the administrative databases of healthcare institutions for 4.2 million health-assisted residents. Between January 2012 and March 2021, patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis for HF were included. Among healthcare utilization and costs, treatments, hospitalizations, and specialist services were evaluated. The HF group was compared with a population without HF (no-HF) similar for age, sex distribution, and cardiovascular risk factors.\nResults: The same number of patients with (N = 74,085) and without HF (N = 74,085) was included. A profile of cardiovascular comorbidities emerged in the HF group, mainly hypertension (88.6%), cardiovascular disease (61.3%) and diabetes (32.1%). Hospitalizations from any cause were 635.6 vs 429.8/1,000 person-year in the HF vs no-HF group. At one-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 24.9% in HF patients and 8.4% in no-HF. Resource utilization/patient was respectively 26.8 ± 15.9 vs 17.1 ± 12.5 for medications, 0.8 ± 1.2 vs 0.3 ± 0.8 for hospitalizations, and 9.4 ± 12.6 vs 6.5 ± 9.8 for specialist services. This resource utilization resulted in significantly higher total healthcare costs in the HF group vs no-HF group (€ 5,910 vs € 3,574, p < 0.001), mainly related to hospitalizations (€ 3,702 vs € 1,958).\nConclusions: HF patients show a significantly higher clinical and economic burden than no-HF, with total healthcare costs being about 1.7 times the costs of the no-HF group.\nKeywords: Cardiovascular comorbidities, Healthcare costs, Heart failure, Hospitalizations","PeriodicalId":228031,"journal":{"name":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"99 41","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2024.3013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) affects 1% of subjects aged 45-55 and over 10% of subjects aged ≥ 80 and in Italy represents the third leading cause of hospitalization. Objective: To analyse the clinical and economic burden of HF in the Italian real clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the administrative databases of healthcare institutions for 4.2 million health-assisted residents. Between January 2012 and March 2021, patients with a hospital discharge diagnosis for HF were included. Among healthcare utilization and costs, treatments, hospitalizations, and specialist services were evaluated. The HF group was compared with a population without HF (no-HF) similar for age, sex distribution, and cardiovascular risk factors. Results: The same number of patients with (N = 74,085) and without HF (N = 74,085) was included. A profile of cardiovascular comorbidities emerged in the HF group, mainly hypertension (88.6%), cardiovascular disease (61.3%) and diabetes (32.1%). Hospitalizations from any cause were 635.6 vs 429.8/1,000 person-year in the HF vs no-HF group. At one-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 24.9% in HF patients and 8.4% in no-HF. Resource utilization/patient was respectively 26.8 ± 15.9 vs 17.1 ± 12.5 for medications, 0.8 ± 1.2 vs 0.3 ± 0.8 for hospitalizations, and 9.4 ± 12.6 vs 6.5 ± 9.8 for specialist services. This resource utilization resulted in significantly higher total healthcare costs in the HF group vs no-HF group (€ 5,910 vs € 3,574, p < 0.001), mainly related to hospitalizations (€ 3,702 vs € 1,958). Conclusions: HF patients show a significantly higher clinical and economic burden than no-HF, with total healthcare costs being about 1.7 times the costs of the no-HF group. Keywords: Cardiovascular comorbidities, Healthcare costs, Heart failure, Hospitalizations
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心力衰竭与经济影响:意大利实际临床实践分析
导言:在意大利,心力衰竭(HF)影响着 1%的 45-55 岁患者和超过 10%的≥80 岁患者,是导致住院治疗的第三大原因:分析意大利实际临床实践中心力衰竭的临床和经济负担:方法:对医疗机构的行政数据库进行回顾性分析,研究对象为 420 万名接受医疗援助的居民。研究纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月期间出院诊断为高血压的患者。在医疗利用率和成本中,对治疗、住院和专科服务进行了评估。将高血压组与年龄、性别分布和心血管风险因素相似的无高血压组(no-HF)人群进行了比较:结果:纳入的心房颤动患者(N = 74,085 人)和非心房颤动患者(N = 74,085 人)人数相同。心房颤动组患者合并心血管疾病的比例较高,主要是高血压(88.6%)、心血管疾病(61.3%)和糖尿病(32.1%)。在心房颤动组和非心房颤动组中,因各种原因住院的人数分别为 635.6 人/千人年和 429.8 人/千人年。随访一年后,高血压患者的全因死亡率为 24.9%,非高血压患者为 8.4%。每名患者的资源利用率分别为:药物 26.8 ± 15.9 vs 17.1 ± 12.5,住院 0.8 ± 1.2 vs 0.3 ± 0.8,专科服务 9.4 ± 12.6 vs 6.5 ± 9.8。这种资源利用率导致心房颤动组与非心房颤动组的医疗总费用明显更高(5910 欧元对 3574 欧元,P < 0.001),主要与住院有关(3702 欧元对 1958 欧元):结论:心房颤动患者的临床和经济负担明显高于非心房颤动患者,总医疗费用约为非心房颤动组的1.7倍:心血管合并症 医疗成本 心力衰竭 住院治疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The economic impact of 14 compassionate use programs for medicines in Italy, in the perspective of the National Health Service Heart failure and economic impact: an analysis in real clinical practice in Italy A pharmacoeconomic analysis from Italian guidelines for the management of prolactinomas New organizational and governance strategies in the management of epilepsy in Italy Personalized support programs with innovative digital tools to manage and monitor patients suffering from epilepsy: EpiOnApp case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1