Artificial sweeteners: regulation, technological implications in food production and health

Juliana Alves Diniz, Maisa Estefânia de Oliveira Pedreira, Susan R. Moore, B. M. Dala-Paula
{"title":"Artificial sweeteners: regulation, technological implications in food production and health","authors":"Juliana Alves Diniz, Maisa Estefânia de Oliveira Pedreira, Susan R. Moore, B. M. Dala-Paula","doi":"10.46311/2318-0579.59.euj4280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sweeteners provide a sweet taste to foods and are used to replace sucrose and reduce caloric value. Acesulfame potassium, aspartame, sodium cyclamate, saccharin, sucralose and neotame are the artificial sweeteners regulated in Brazil by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA). The consumption of these additives has become controversial due to recent scientific evidence questioning their safety and outcomes regarding weight loss, dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota, insulin resistance, diabetes and cancer. Even today, little is known about the long-term consequences of their consumption. Therefore, this study aimed to carry out a review of artificial sweeteners regulated in Brazil, contextualizing their regulatory framework, the technological implications regarding their use and the effects on health. Considering the now controversial outcomes regarding the consumption of many artificial sweeteners, and the long period in which levels of acceptable daily intake have been in place, it is suggested their consumption should now not be encouraged, being restricted to population groups that have a risk-based physiological or metabolic need to replace sucrose. Also, for these cases, it would be important to differentiate between foods containing different sweeteners (or tabletop sweeteners), to alleviate possible chronic health effects. New studies with more robust and consistent methodologies are required to support the safety assessment reviews of each artificial sweetener.","PeriodicalId":401998,"journal":{"name":"Uningá Journal","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uningá Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46311/2318-0579.59.euj4280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sweeteners provide a sweet taste to foods and are used to replace sucrose and reduce caloric value. Acesulfame potassium, aspartame, sodium cyclamate, saccharin, sucralose and neotame are the artificial sweeteners regulated in Brazil by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA). The consumption of these additives has become controversial due to recent scientific evidence questioning their safety and outcomes regarding weight loss, dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota, insulin resistance, diabetes and cancer. Even today, little is known about the long-term consequences of their consumption. Therefore, this study aimed to carry out a review of artificial sweeteners regulated in Brazil, contextualizing their regulatory framework, the technological implications regarding their use and the effects on health. Considering the now controversial outcomes regarding the consumption of many artificial sweeteners, and the long period in which levels of acceptable daily intake have been in place, it is suggested their consumption should now not be encouraged, being restricted to population groups that have a risk-based physiological or metabolic need to replace sucrose. Also, for these cases, it would be important to differentiate between foods containing different sweeteners (or tabletop sweeteners), to alleviate possible chronic health effects. New studies with more robust and consistent methodologies are required to support the safety assessment reviews of each artificial sweetener.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人造甜味剂:食品生产和健康中的监管、技术影响
甜味剂为食物提供甜味,用来代替蔗糖和降低热量。安赛蜜钾、阿斯巴甜、甜蜜素钠、糖精、三氯蔗糖和纽甜是巴西卫生监管机构(ANVISA)监管的人工甜味剂。由于最近的科学证据质疑这些添加剂的安全性以及它们对减肥、肠道菌群失调、胰岛素抵抗、糖尿病和癌症的影响,这些添加剂的消费已经成为争议。即使在今天,人们对他们消费的长期后果也知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在对巴西监管的人工甜味剂进行审查,将其监管框架、使用人工甜味剂的技术含义及其对健康的影响置于背景之下。考虑到目前许多人造甜味剂的消费引起的争议,以及长期以来可接受的每日摄入量水平,建议现在不应鼓励它们的消费,而应限制在具有基于风险的生理或代谢需要替代蔗糖的人群中。此外,对于这些情况,区分含有不同甜味剂(或桌面甜味剂)的食物是很重要的,以减轻可能的慢性健康影响。新的研究需要更可靠和一致的方法来支持每一种人工甜味剂的安全性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral health promotion during pregnancy: a literature review Use of preoperative mouthwash during the pandemic: report of the Dental Clinic Safety in enteral nutritional therapy: knowledge of patients and caregivers Aesthetic-chemical properties and clinical indications of giomers: literature review Effects of aquatic therapy on gait and balance in patients with brain vascular accident: a literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1