Impoliteness Strategies Used by Sylvie Grateau Toward Emily Cooper in Emily in Paris Season One

Tania Silvia Santoso, Herwindy Maria Tedjaatmadja
{"title":"Impoliteness Strategies Used by Sylvie Grateau Toward Emily Cooper in Emily in Paris Season One","authors":"Tania Silvia Santoso, Herwindy Maria Tedjaatmadja","doi":"10.9744/katakita.10.2.329-335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This descriptive-quantitative study is aimed at finding out the types of impoliteness super-strategies used by Sylvie toward her employee, Emily, in Emily in Paris season one, as well as the most and least frequently used types. The main theory used is Culpeper's (1996, 2005) impoliteness strategy. The findings reveal that Sylvie has implemented all five types of impoliteness super-strategies. The most common is negative impoliteness which most likely occurs because Sylvie always opposes Emily on purposes despite knowing how much Emily wants to be professionally acknowledged at Savoir. The least frequently used is withhold politeness, which might happen because although Sylvie is a generally nice person, she uses clearer impolite strategies to Emily on purpose. The writers conclude that Sylvie purposefully uses impoliteness strategies and adds impolite gestures, to bring Emily down and to emphasize her power to get rid of Emily from Savoir. Keywords: impoliteness, impoliteness strategy, status, utterance","PeriodicalId":359834,"journal":{"name":"K@ta Kita","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"K@ta Kita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.10.2.329-335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This descriptive-quantitative study is aimed at finding out the types of impoliteness super-strategies used by Sylvie toward her employee, Emily, in Emily in Paris season one, as well as the most and least frequently used types. The main theory used is Culpeper's (1996, 2005) impoliteness strategy. The findings reveal that Sylvie has implemented all five types of impoliteness super-strategies. The most common is negative impoliteness which most likely occurs because Sylvie always opposes Emily on purposes despite knowing how much Emily wants to be professionally acknowledged at Savoir. The least frequently used is withhold politeness, which might happen because although Sylvie is a generally nice person, she uses clearer impolite strategies to Emily on purpose. The writers conclude that Sylvie purposefully uses impoliteness strategies and adds impolite gestures, to bring Emily down and to emphasize her power to get rid of Emily from Savoir. Keywords: impoliteness, impoliteness strategy, status, utterance
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《巴黎的艾米丽》第一季中西尔维·格拉托对艾米丽·库珀的不礼貌策略
这个描述性定量研究的目的是找出西尔维在《巴黎的艾米丽》第一季中对她的员工艾米丽使用的不礼貌超级策略的类型,以及最常用和最不常用的类型。使用的主要理论是Culpeper(1996, 2005)的不礼貌策略。研究结果显示,西尔维已经实施了所有五种不礼貌的超级策略。最常见的是消极的不礼貌,这很可能是因为西尔维总是故意反对艾米丽,尽管她知道艾米丽多么想在Savoir得到专业的认可。最不常用的是含蓄礼貌,这可能是因为尽管西尔维总体上是一个好人,但她故意对艾米丽使用了更明确的不礼貌策略。作者得出结论,西尔维故意使用不礼貌的策略,加上不礼貌的手势,使艾米丽失望,并强调她摆脱艾米丽的权力从Savoir。关键词:不礼貌,不礼貌策略,地位,话语
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Magnanimity: A Screenplay Exploring the Unconditional Forgiveness A Broken Connection: A Screenplay about Psychosocial Problem Effects on People Living with HIV/AIDS Rhetorical Devices Used by Mark Zuckerberg in His 2007 Harvard Commencement Speech Here Comes The Sun: A Novel Portraying Quarter-life Crisis of a College Graduate Thorns Covered in Petals on a Pedestal: A Collection of Lyrical Poetry Exploring the Cause and Effects of Toxic Female Friendship¬
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1