Engineering as social and ethical practice: the role of new course accreditation requirements

S. Johnston, D. Eager
{"title":"Engineering as social and ethical practice: the role of new course accreditation requirements","authors":"S. Johnston, D. Eager","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper begins with a brief exploration of the rapid changes in the practice of engineering during the twentieth century, and particularly over its last few decades. Engineers now routinely work across national and cultural boundaries and in multi-disciplinary teams. While engineering practice draws on a range of technical knowledge and skills, it is also a social activity that continues to shape our modern world. Engineering practice underpins the increasingly global character of commerce and industry. Engineers need to understand and appreciate the nature and impact of their work in order to make an effective professional contribution to meeting the key challenge of the twenty-first century, global sustainability. The paper discusses accreditation requirements for engineering programs in the USA and Australia in the light of these changing expectations for the engineering profession. In particular it looks at the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and the Computer Science Accreditation Board (CSAB) Engineering Criteria 2000 in the USA and compares them with the new course accreditation requirements that came out of a recent review of engineering education in Australia.","PeriodicalId":394055,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society","volume":"307 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper begins with a brief exploration of the rapid changes in the practice of engineering during the twentieth century, and particularly over its last few decades. Engineers now routinely work across national and cultural boundaries and in multi-disciplinary teams. While engineering practice draws on a range of technical knowledge and skills, it is also a social activity that continues to shape our modern world. Engineering practice underpins the increasingly global character of commerce and industry. Engineers need to understand and appreciate the nature and impact of their work in order to make an effective professional contribution to meeting the key challenge of the twenty-first century, global sustainability. The paper discusses accreditation requirements for engineering programs in the USA and Australia in the light of these changing expectations for the engineering profession. In particular it looks at the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) and the Computer Science Accreditation Board (CSAB) Engineering Criteria 2000 in the USA and compares them with the new course accreditation requirements that came out of a recent review of engineering education in Australia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为社会和伦理实践的工程:新课程认证要求的作用
本文首先简要探讨了20世纪,特别是近几十年来工程实践的快速变化。工程师们现在经常跨越国家和文化的界限,在多学科的团队中工作。虽然工程实践借鉴了一系列的技术知识和技能,但它也是一种社会活动,继续塑造我们的现代世界。工程实践支撑着商业和工业日益全球化的特征。工程师需要理解和欣赏他们工作的性质和影响,以便为迎接21世纪全球可持续性的关键挑战做出有效的专业贡献。本文根据对工程专业不断变化的期望,讨论了美国和澳大利亚工程项目的认证要求。它特别关注了美国工程与技术认证委员会(ABET)和计算机科学认证委员会(CSAB) 2000年工程标准,并将它们与澳大利亚最近对工程教育进行的审查中提出的新课程认证要求进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethics, law and technology: a case study in computer-mediated communication A conceptual framework for teaching Internet ethics Humanities and social sciences in engineering education-postwar to postmodern and beyond On subjectivity in focal engineering What is the key to globalisation? [social aspects of automation]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1