Single-group analysis of simulation training improves the ability of anesthesiologist assistant students to use TeamSTEPPS during crisis management scenarios

Trine Vik, F. Puskas, Erik Nelson
{"title":"Single-group analysis of simulation training improves the ability of anesthesiologist assistant students to use TeamSTEPPS during crisis management scenarios","authors":"Trine Vik, F. Puskas, Erik Nelson","doi":"10.1102/2051-7726.2019.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) was developed to increase patient safety through improved health care teamwork skills. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the teamwork skills of anesthesiologist assistant (AA) students improve after training with simulated crisis management scenarios. Methods: This is a single-group pre-intervention and post-intervention study that included 12 students and four evaluators during crisis management simulations. Student self-assessment surveys and preceptor evaluation forms were administered before and after the intervention. The self-assessment survey evaluated their knowledge of and clinical utility of TeamSTEPPS strategies, and how well they applied specific TeamSTEPPS skills. The preceptors evaluated how the students performed the TeamSTEPPS skills along with their knowledge of principles and team structure. The survey and evaluation questions used a 5-point Likert scale. The intervention consisted of teaching the students the TeamSTEPPS Essentials course and giving feedback between the two crisis management scenarios. Results: Student self-evaluation scores on TeamSTEPPS knowledge (1.25–4.08, P 5 0.001), utility (3.75–4.75, P = 0.03), leadership (2.08–3.17, P = 0.02), and mutual support (2.42–3.25, P = 0.03) showed improvement. Differences in student self-evaluation scores on communication (3.25–3.50, P = 0.55) were non-significant. Preceptor evaluation for TeamSTEPPS knowledge (1.52–3.85, P 5 0.001), team structure (1.96–4.08, P 5 0.001), leadership (2.33–3.52, P = 0.006), communication (2.54–3.61, P = 0.023), mutual support (2.08–3.27, P = 0.005), and situational awareness (2.40– 3.69, P = 0.002) all showed significant improvement. Conclusion: This innovative curriculum helps AA students to learn the principles of TeamSTEPPS and improves their performance during simulated crisis management scenarios.","PeriodicalId":202461,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2019.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) was developed to increase patient safety through improved health care teamwork skills. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the teamwork skills of anesthesiologist assistant (AA) students improve after training with simulated crisis management scenarios. Methods: This is a single-group pre-intervention and post-intervention study that included 12 students and four evaluators during crisis management simulations. Student self-assessment surveys and preceptor evaluation forms were administered before and after the intervention. The self-assessment survey evaluated their knowledge of and clinical utility of TeamSTEPPS strategies, and how well they applied specific TeamSTEPPS skills. The preceptors evaluated how the students performed the TeamSTEPPS skills along with their knowledge of principles and team structure. The survey and evaluation questions used a 5-point Likert scale. The intervention consisted of teaching the students the TeamSTEPPS Essentials course and giving feedback between the two crisis management scenarios. Results: Student self-evaluation scores on TeamSTEPPS knowledge (1.25–4.08, P 5 0.001), utility (3.75–4.75, P = 0.03), leadership (2.08–3.17, P = 0.02), and mutual support (2.42–3.25, P = 0.03) showed improvement. Differences in student self-evaluation scores on communication (3.25–3.50, P = 0.55) were non-significant. Preceptor evaluation for TeamSTEPPS knowledge (1.52–3.85, P 5 0.001), team structure (1.96–4.08, P 5 0.001), leadership (2.33–3.52, P = 0.006), communication (2.54–3.61, P = 0.023), mutual support (2.08–3.27, P = 0.005), and situational awareness (2.40– 3.69, P = 0.002) all showed significant improvement. Conclusion: This innovative curriculum helps AA students to learn the principles of TeamSTEPPS and improves their performance during simulated crisis management scenarios.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟训练的单组分析提高了麻醉师助理学生在危机管理场景中使用TeamSTEPPS的能力
背景:提高绩效和患者安全的团队战略和工具(TeamSTEPPS)是为了通过提高医疗团队合作技能来提高患者安全而开发的。本研究旨在探讨麻醉医师助理(AA)学生在接受模拟危机管理情景训练后,其团队合作能力是否有所提高。方法:这是一项单组干预前和干预后研究,包括12名学生和4名危机管理模拟评估员。在干预前后分别进行学生自我评估调查和导师评估表。自我评估调查评估了他们对TeamSTEPPS策略的知识和临床效用,以及他们如何应用特定的TeamSTEPPS技能。导师们评估了学生们如何运用TeamSTEPPS技能,以及他们对原则和团队结构的了解。调查和评估问题采用5分李克特量表。干预包括教授学生TeamSTEPPS要点课程,并在两种危机管理方案之间给出反馈。结果:学生在TeamSTEPPS知识(1.25 ~ 4.08,P = 5 0.001)、效用(3.75 ~ 4.75,P = 0.03)、领导能力(2.08 ~ 3.17,P = 0.02)、相互支持(2.42 ~ 3.25,P = 0.03)方面的自我评价得分均有提高。学生沟通自我评价得分差异无统计学意义(3.25 ~ 3.50,P = 0.55)。训导对TeamSTEPPS知识(1.52 ~ 3.85,P = 5 0.001)、团队结构(1.96 ~ 4.08,P = 5 0.001)、领导力(2.33 ~ 3.52,P = 0.006)、沟通(2.54 ~ 3.61,P = 0.023)、相互支持(2.08 ~ 3.27,P = 0.005)、态势感知(2.40 ~ 3.69,P = 0.002)的评价均有显著提高。结论:该创新课程帮助AA学生学习TeamSTEPPS的原则,并提高他们在模拟危机管理场景中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A low-cost phantom for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine-needle aspiration training: face and construct validity Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for assessing and improving quality of surgical performance: the current status and future Simulation training: a novel and effective way to improve knowledge and attitudes towards coroner’s court attendance Conflicting intra-departmental views on the importance of simulation in general surgery Occult metastatic axillary carcinoma masked underlying primary accessory breast carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1