Retired Dreams: Dom Casmurro, Myth and Modernity by Paul B. Dixon (review)

Susan Canty Quinlan
{"title":"Retired Dreams: Dom Casmurro, Myth and Modernity by Paul B. Dixon (review)","authors":"Susan Canty Quinlan","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1990.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"sends the reader spinning from Aristotle to Oliver North, Restoration drama to film, body art to Shakespeare, and more. In placing his study in the context of late twentieth-century literary theory and cultural criticism, Blau relies heavily on the work of such figures as Barthes, Benjamin, Foucault, and Lacan (to cite only the most frequently quoted writers); this tendency alone contributes significantly to the book's complexity. The end result is a sometimes brilliant, sometimes mystifying text that some readers may simply find unreadable. Yet Blau's text forces his readers—the book's audience—to test out the very roles for an audience that he attempts to describe. The nature of the book and its theoretical framework make it impossible for Blau to offer definitive conclusions from these meditations. But the book does offer a compelling new analysis of some venerable critical problems. Although Blau often focuses upon traditional dramatic texts from ancient Greece and Renaissance England, his work is especially good in exploring the role of the audience in modern and contemporary drama and in performance art and experimental theatre. Blau's treatment of Bertolt Brecht and Antonin Artaud as precursors of poststructuralism is also insightful: \"What has since been elaborated by Foucault and Derrida was more than latent in Brecht and Artaud: there is a sense in which power lives by theater, the duplicity ofmere appearance, by which the audience is deprived of power\" (42). Finally, Blau makes some stimulating points about the audience created by the entertainment industry through its endless statistical analyses and its packaging and repackaging of art as a commodity. All in all, The Audience is a fascinating but often an overwhelmingly difficult book to read. Steeped as it is in contemporary critical theory and cultural critique, much of the book is probably not accessible to scholars and teachers of a traditional ilk. Literary scholars may also find the work disappointing since Blau never adequately deals with the connection between audience and readers. Still, the book is an important and insightful contribution to performance theory and cultural criticism.","PeriodicalId":326714,"journal":{"name":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1990.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

sends the reader spinning from Aristotle to Oliver North, Restoration drama to film, body art to Shakespeare, and more. In placing his study in the context of late twentieth-century literary theory and cultural criticism, Blau relies heavily on the work of such figures as Barthes, Benjamin, Foucault, and Lacan (to cite only the most frequently quoted writers); this tendency alone contributes significantly to the book's complexity. The end result is a sometimes brilliant, sometimes mystifying text that some readers may simply find unreadable. Yet Blau's text forces his readers—the book's audience—to test out the very roles for an audience that he attempts to describe. The nature of the book and its theoretical framework make it impossible for Blau to offer definitive conclusions from these meditations. But the book does offer a compelling new analysis of some venerable critical problems. Although Blau often focuses upon traditional dramatic texts from ancient Greece and Renaissance England, his work is especially good in exploring the role of the audience in modern and contemporary drama and in performance art and experimental theatre. Blau's treatment of Bertolt Brecht and Antonin Artaud as precursors of poststructuralism is also insightful: "What has since been elaborated by Foucault and Derrida was more than latent in Brecht and Artaud: there is a sense in which power lives by theater, the duplicity ofmere appearance, by which the audience is deprived of power" (42). Finally, Blau makes some stimulating points about the audience created by the entertainment industry through its endless statistical analyses and its packaging and repackaging of art as a commodity. All in all, The Audience is a fascinating but often an overwhelmingly difficult book to read. Steeped as it is in contemporary critical theory and cultural critique, much of the book is probably not accessible to scholars and teachers of a traditional ilk. Literary scholars may also find the work disappointing since Blau never adequately deals with the connection between audience and readers. Still, the book is an important and insightful contribution to performance theory and cultural criticism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《隐退的梦想:Dom Casmurro、神话与现代性》,作者:保罗·迪克森(书评)
让读者从亚里士多德转到奥利弗·诺斯,从复辟时期的戏剧转到电影,从人体艺术转到莎士比亚等等。在将他的研究置于20世纪晚期文学理论和文化批评的背景下,布劳严重依赖于巴特、本雅明、福柯和拉康等人物的作品(仅引用最常被引用的作家);单是这种倾向就极大地增加了这本书的复杂性。最终的结果是一个有时辉煌,有时神秘的文本,一些读者可能会发现根本无法阅读。然而,布劳的文本迫使他的读者——这本书的读者——去测试他试图描述的读者所扮演的角色。这本书的性质和它的理论框架使得布劳不可能从这些思考中得出明确的结论。但这本书确实对一些古老的关键问题提供了令人信服的新分析。虽然布劳经常关注古希腊和文艺复兴时期英国的传统戏剧文本,但他的作品尤其擅长探索观众在现当代戏剧、表演艺术和实验戏剧中的角色。布劳将布莱希特(Bertolt Brecht)和安东宁·亚图(Antonin Artaud)视为后结构主义先驱的论述也很有见地:“福柯和德里达所阐述的内容在布莱希特和亚图身上不仅仅是潜在的:有一种感觉,权力通过戏剧而存在,仅仅是外表的两重性,观众被剥夺了权力”(42)。最后,Blau通过无休止的统计分析和将艺术作为一种商品的包装和再包装,对娱乐产业所创造的受众提出了一些令人兴奋的观点。总而言之,《听众》是一本引人入胜的书,但往往是一本极其难读的书。这本书浸透了当代批判理论和文化批判,很多传统的学者和教师可能读不懂。文学学者可能也会觉得这部作品令人失望,因为布劳从来没有充分处理观众和读者之间的联系。尽管如此,这本书对表演理论和文化批评做出了重要而深刻的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Writing Gender in Early Modern Chinese Women's Tanci Fiction by Li Guo H. D. between Image and Epic: The Mysteries of Her Poetics by Gary Burnett (review) Mapping the Landscape in Addison's "Pleasures of the Imagination" Dancer Very Close and Very Slow by Judith Hemschemeyer (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1