Organizational Justice and Dispute Resolution: A Six-Factor Model for Workplace Mediation

Tina Nabatchi, Lisa Blomgren Amsler (formerly Bingham), D. Good
{"title":"Organizational Justice and Dispute Resolution: A Six-Factor Model for Workplace Mediation","authors":"Tina Nabatchi, Lisa Blomgren Amsler (formerly Bingham), D. Good","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.735145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationship between organizational justice and workplace mediation. Despite the value of using organizational justice to assess the perceived fairness of workplace mediation, there may be some problems with the wholesale application of the traditional four-factor model of organizational justice to such processes. The most obvious problem is the application of a model designed to assess justice perception in a two-way supervisor-subordinate relationship (as is the case in most organizational justice research) to a mediation process where there are multiple and divergent directions of interaction and reduced power imbalances. This study proposes and tests a six-factor model of organizational justice for application to workplace mediation. It finds that a six-factor model provides a significantly better fit for workplace mediation than the traditional four-factor model. This result has implications for both the theory and practice behind workplace mediation.","PeriodicalId":264966,"journal":{"name":"Two-Party Negotiations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Two-Party Negotiations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.735145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between organizational justice and workplace mediation. Despite the value of using organizational justice to assess the perceived fairness of workplace mediation, there may be some problems with the wholesale application of the traditional four-factor model of organizational justice to such processes. The most obvious problem is the application of a model designed to assess justice perception in a two-way supervisor-subordinate relationship (as is the case in most organizational justice research) to a mediation process where there are multiple and divergent directions of interaction and reduced power imbalances. This study proposes and tests a six-factor model of organizational justice for application to workplace mediation. It finds that a six-factor model provides a significantly better fit for workplace mediation than the traditional four-factor model. This result has implications for both the theory and practice behind workplace mediation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织公正与争议解决:工作场所调解的六因素模型
本研究探讨组织公平与职场调解的关系。尽管使用组织公正来评估工作场所调解的感知公平性具有价值,但将传统的组织公正四因素模型大规模应用于此类过程可能存在一些问题。最明显的问题是,将一个旨在评估双向上下级关系(如大多数组织正义研究中的情况)中的正义感知的模型应用于一个调解过程,在这个过程中,存在多种不同的互动方向,并减少了权力不平衡。本研究提出并检验组织公平的六因子模型,并将其应用于职场调解。研究发现,六因素模型比传统的四因素模型更适合工作场所调解。这一结果对工作场所调解的理论和实践都有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Getting to NO: Theory and Evidence for Instrumental Negotiations Rethinking the Fairness Hypothesis: Procedural Justice in Simple Bargaining Games Developing Evidence-Based Expertise in Emotion Management: Strategically Displaying and Responding to Emotions in Negotiations Bargaining and Specialization in Marriage Experimental Tests for Gender Effects in a Principal-Agent Game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1