Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Twitter with Case of Large Scale Social Restriction in Jakarta using Support Vector Machine Algorithm

Praise Setiawan Saragih, Deden Witarsyah, F. Hamami, J. Machado
{"title":"Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Twitter with Case of Large Scale Social Restriction in Jakarta using Support Vector Machine Algorithm","authors":"Praise Setiawan Saragih, Deden Witarsyah, F. Hamami, J. Machado","doi":"10.1109/ICADEIS52521.2021.9701961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the Large-Scale Social Restrictions (LSSR or PSBB in Indonesian) policy was implemented it the policy was not entirely obeyed by the community which then reaped various opinions and responses on various social media, especially on Twitter. This study aims to conduct a sentiment analysis to find out the cause or phenomena that occur based on the opinions or views of Twitter. The Tweet data about the implementation of LSSR both part 1 and part 2 in Jakarta were obtained as many as 1080 opinions using the crawling method then the data is manually labelled with two labels, which are positive and negative after labelled the data is cleaned after and the data is processed by being weighted using the Bag of Words and TF-IDF extraction feature. The classification process is carried out with four splitting data scenarios, with 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, 90:10 then classified using the Support Vector Machines algorithm. The final result of this study shows that the classification accuracy results using the Support Vector Machine algorithm with 90:10 data splitting ratio using the TFIDF extraction feature is superior with an accuracy value of 85.185% and F1-Score 72.413%, which is better when compared to the Bag of words extraction feature which produces an accuracy value of 83.333% and F1-Score 66.666%. As for this study, Twitter users tend to give opinions with negative sentiments, which contain complaints and discomfort regarding the implementation of the LSSR policies, both the first LSSR and the second LSSR. Finally, the results of this research are also expected to be input for the government when making better policies in the future.","PeriodicalId":422702,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference Advancement in Data Science, E-learning and Information Systems (ICADEIS)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference Advancement in Data Science, E-learning and Information Systems (ICADEIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICADEIS52521.2021.9701961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

When the Large-Scale Social Restrictions (LSSR or PSBB in Indonesian) policy was implemented it the policy was not entirely obeyed by the community which then reaped various opinions and responses on various social media, especially on Twitter. This study aims to conduct a sentiment analysis to find out the cause or phenomena that occur based on the opinions or views of Twitter. The Tweet data about the implementation of LSSR both part 1 and part 2 in Jakarta were obtained as many as 1080 opinions using the crawling method then the data is manually labelled with two labels, which are positive and negative after labelled the data is cleaned after and the data is processed by being weighted using the Bag of Words and TF-IDF extraction feature. The classification process is carried out with four splitting data scenarios, with 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, 90:10 then classified using the Support Vector Machines algorithm. The final result of this study shows that the classification accuracy results using the Support Vector Machine algorithm with 90:10 data splitting ratio using the TFIDF extraction feature is superior with an accuracy value of 85.185% and F1-Score 72.413%, which is better when compared to the Bag of words extraction feature which produces an accuracy value of 83.333% and F1-Score 66.666%. As for this study, Twitter users tend to give opinions with negative sentiments, which contain complaints and discomfort regarding the implementation of the LSSR policies, both the first LSSR and the second LSSR. Finally, the results of this research are also expected to be input for the government when making better policies in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于支持向量机算法的雅加达大规模社交限制的社交媒体Twitter情绪分析
当大规模社会限制(印度尼西亚语为LSSR或PSBB)政策实施时,如果该政策没有完全得到社区的遵守,那么就会在各种社交媒体上,特别是Twitter上获得各种意见和回应。本研究旨在进行情感分析,找出基于Twitter的观点或观点而发生的原因或现象。第1部分和第2部分在雅加达实施LSSR的推文数据,使用爬行方法获得了多达1080条意见,然后人工标记两个标签,标记后为正标签和负标签,然后对数据进行清理,并使用Bag of Words和TF-IDF提取特征对数据进行加权处理。分类过程分为四种数据分割场景,分别为60:40、70:30、80:20、90:10,然后使用支持向量机算法进行分类。本研究的最终结果表明,使用TFIDF提取特征的数据分割比为90:10的支持向量机算法的分类准确率结果更优,准确率值为85.185%,F1-Score为72.413%,优于Bag of words提取特征的准确率值83.333%,F1-Score为66.666%。在本研究中,Twitter用户倾向于给出负面情绪的意见,包括对LSSR政策执行的抱怨和不适,无论是第一个LSSR还是第二个LSSR。最后,本研究的结果也有望在未来为政府制定更好的政策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drug Review-based Diabetes Prediction by Using Naïve Bayes Method Scrum Best Practices Recommendation: a Media and Community Startup Case Study Sniffing Prevention in LoRa Network Using Combination of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and Message Authentication Code (MAC) Challenges in the implementation of E-Learning in Afghanistan Higher Education Implementation of the Spiral Optimization Algorithm in the Support Vector Machine (SVM) Classification Method (Case Study: Diabetes Prediction)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1