Agile Bureaucracy for Public Policy Accountability: Implementation of the Street Vendor Policy in Indonesia

Sofjan Aripin, Rulinawaty, Lukman Samboteng
{"title":"Agile Bureaucracy for Public Policy Accountability: Implementation of the Street Vendor Policy in Indonesia","authors":"Sofjan Aripin, Rulinawaty, Lukman Samboteng","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.210629.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public policy accountability seems to pose an everdeveloping challenge all around the globe. The increasing rate of complexity at the global scale compels bureaucracies to enhance their capabilities. In reality, however, bureaucracies become the most frequent targets of complaints from civic community organizations with respect to public policy implementations. On the other hand, they are seen as necessary multilateral, but much-in-need-of-reform, actors in global development. The main objective of this study is to build an agile bureaucracy model for public accountability in the implementation of the street vendor (PKL) policy in Indonesia. This model will observe whether agile bureaucracy management is helpful or inhibitory instead to the implementation of public policies. This study will also reveal the demanded accountability and politicization in policy actors’ relationships. Data were collected by interview through focus group discussion (FGD) technique with twenty street vendor groups, with 10 to 15 members in each group. Documentation of informants who were directly involved in activities was also carried out. Data analysis processes included data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of this research showed that building an agile model for the implementation of public policies helps teams with governance to generate high-quality outputs quickly. This features changes to the mindset which prioritizes clear, thorough vision over prescriptive details. This facilitates flexible leadership and organizational structures, cross-functional teams, talent ecosystems, and collaborative cultures and behaviors. Upon improvement and application to all organizations, agile breaks down functional silos, heightens transparency and accountability, and empowers employees. Keywords—agile bureaucracy, public policy accountability, public policy implementation, street vendors","PeriodicalId":176537,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Administration Science 2020 (ICAS 2020)","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Administration Science 2020 (ICAS 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210629.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public policy accountability seems to pose an everdeveloping challenge all around the globe. The increasing rate of complexity at the global scale compels bureaucracies to enhance their capabilities. In reality, however, bureaucracies become the most frequent targets of complaints from civic community organizations with respect to public policy implementations. On the other hand, they are seen as necessary multilateral, but much-in-need-of-reform, actors in global development. The main objective of this study is to build an agile bureaucracy model for public accountability in the implementation of the street vendor (PKL) policy in Indonesia. This model will observe whether agile bureaucracy management is helpful or inhibitory instead to the implementation of public policies. This study will also reveal the demanded accountability and politicization in policy actors’ relationships. Data were collected by interview through focus group discussion (FGD) technique with twenty street vendor groups, with 10 to 15 members in each group. Documentation of informants who were directly involved in activities was also carried out. Data analysis processes included data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of this research showed that building an agile model for the implementation of public policies helps teams with governance to generate high-quality outputs quickly. This features changes to the mindset which prioritizes clear, thorough vision over prescriptive details. This facilitates flexible leadership and organizational structures, cross-functional teams, talent ecosystems, and collaborative cultures and behaviors. Upon improvement and application to all organizations, agile breaks down functional silos, heightens transparency and accountability, and empowers employees. Keywords—agile bureaucracy, public policy accountability, public policy implementation, street vendors
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
敏捷官僚制的公共政策问责:街头小贩政策在印度尼西亚的实施
公共政策问责制似乎在全球范围内构成了一个不断发展的挑战。全球范围内日益增长的复杂性迫使官僚机构提高其能力。然而,在现实中,官僚机构成为民间社区组织就公共政策执行提出投诉的最常见目标。另一方面,它们被视为全球发展中必不可少但亟需改革的多边行为体。本研究的主要目的是为印尼街头小贩政策实施中的公共问责建立一个灵活的官僚制模型。该模型将观察敏捷官僚制管理是否有助于或抑制公共政策的实施。本研究还将揭示政策行为者关系中所要求的问责制和政治化。通过焦点小组讨论(FGD)技术对20个街头小贩小组进行访谈,每个小组10至15名成员。还对直接参与活动的举报人进行了记录。数据分析过程包括数据简化、数据呈现和得出结论。这项研究的结果表明,为公共政策的实施构建一个敏捷模型有助于治理团队快速生成高质量的输出。这体现了思维方式的改变,即优先考虑清晰、彻底的愿景,而不是规定性的细节。这有利于灵活的领导和组织结构、跨职能团队、人才生态系统以及协作文化和行为。在改进和应用到所有组织之后,敏捷打破了功能孤岛,提高了透明度和问责制,并赋予员工权力。关键词:敏捷官僚制;公共政策问责制;公共政策执行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public Sector Responsiveness in the Strategic Environment Change Rethinking Public Sector Innovation in Indonesia Analysis of Budget Management Performance in the Directorate of Prevention and Control of Vector and Zoonotic Disease (P2PTVZ Directorate), Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Analysis of Organizational Dimensions and the Role of Neighborhood Association/Rukun Tetangga Communications as a Partner of Village Governments in the Covid 19 Pandemic Period An Overview of Indonesian’s Challenging Future:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1