EUTHANASIA IN INDIA – LEGISLATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Sailaja Petikam
{"title":"EUTHANASIA IN INDIA – LEGISLATIVE PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Sailaja Petikam","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every human being should enjoy right to life. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution as well \nas under article 3 of International Convention Universal Declaration of Human \nRights, 1948, guaranteed the right to life. Every aspect of right to life has been \nalways subject to consideration of judiciary and depend upon the facts and \nsituations. Right to die is also claimed under this head. Euthanasia is interpreted \nas 'mercy killing' or 'good death'. It is advocated that there are different \nsituations in which it should be allowed to the person to let him choose his \ndeath in place of compelling him living alive. There are different approaches in \nthis regard which either opposes the grant of mercy killing or denies to grant \nthe death as right to die due to some causes. Everyone has the right to live \ndignified life according to his wish being living into certain limits and it is \nexpected that a human being should struggle also in adverse circumstances \naround him. He should not lean in front of the situations. The Indian culture \ngives us such teachings. Hindu religion believes in the eternity of soul. Death is \nonly the way to change a body. The soul never dies, it is eternal. Muslim religion \nalso believes that life should be finished only upon the wish of Allah, it \ncondemns the unnatural ending of life. But in present society in some situations, \nit is defended that the person should have the right to choose death. Thus, in \nthis context the paper concentrated on the law of euthanasia in India in a \nlegislative perspective and judicial interpretations on euthanasia.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every human being should enjoy right to life. Article 21 of the Indian Constitution as well as under article 3 of International Convention Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, guaranteed the right to life. Every aspect of right to life has been always subject to consideration of judiciary and depend upon the facts and situations. Right to die is also claimed under this head. Euthanasia is interpreted as 'mercy killing' or 'good death'. It is advocated that there are different situations in which it should be allowed to the person to let him choose his death in place of compelling him living alive. There are different approaches in this regard which either opposes the grant of mercy killing or denies to grant the death as right to die due to some causes. Everyone has the right to live dignified life according to his wish being living into certain limits and it is expected that a human being should struggle also in adverse circumstances around him. He should not lean in front of the situations. The Indian culture gives us such teachings. Hindu religion believes in the eternity of soul. Death is only the way to change a body. The soul never dies, it is eternal. Muslim religion also believes that life should be finished only upon the wish of Allah, it condemns the unnatural ending of life. But in present society in some situations, it is defended that the person should have the right to choose death. Thus, in this context the paper concentrated on the law of euthanasia in India in a legislative perspective and judicial interpretations on euthanasia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度的安乐死——立法视角
每个人都应该享有生命权。《印度宪法》第21条以及1948年《世界人权宣言》国际公约第3条保障了生命权。生命权的各个方面一直受到司法部门的审议,并取决于事实和情况。死亡的权利也在这个标题下被要求。安乐死被解释为“安乐死”或“善终”。有人主张,在不同的情况下,应该允许一个人让他选择自己的死亡,而不是强迫他活着。在这方面有不同的做法,要么反对给予安乐死,要么否认由于某些原因给予死亡作为死亡的权利。每个人都有权利根据自己的愿望过上有尊严的生活,因为生活受到了一定的限制,而且一个人也应该在他周围的不利环境中奋斗。他不应该对形势置之不理。印度文化给了我们这样的教导。印度教相信灵魂是永恒的。死亡只是改变身体的一种方式。灵魂永不死亡,它是永恒的。穆斯林宗教还认为,生命应该只在安拉的意愿下结束,它谴责生命的非自然结束。但在当今社会的某些情况下,有人认为人应该有选择死亡的权利。因此,在此背景下,本文主要从立法的角度对印度的安乐死法和安乐死的司法解释进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on constitutionalism and the state of emergency Constitutional Challenges in the Algorithmic Society Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic from the Brazilian Supreme Court and Romanian Constitutional Court Establishing an International Court against Terorism Questions prejudicielles a la Cour de Justice de l'Union Europeene: l'experience de la Cour Constitutionelle de Belgique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1