A study of response times under various deadlock algorithms and job schedulers

ACM '74 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1145/1408800.1408843
S. Sherman, J. Howard, J. Browne
{"title":"A study of response times under various deadlock algorithms and job schedulers","authors":"S. Sherman, J. Howard, J. Browne","doi":"10.1145/1408800.1408843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A trace-driven model is used to study the effects of various schedulers and deadlock control algorithms, and their interactions, on response times in a general-purpose operating system. Jobs' requests for memory and processors are extracted from a production load and used to drive a detailed simulation program. The simulation results show that response time is more sensitive than CPU utilization to differences between schedulers and deadlock control algorithms. Preemptive scheduling improves response time but degrades CPU utilization. Preemptive deadlock control algorithms improve both measures of performance. There are significant interactions between schedulers and deadlock control algorithms. Deadlock control algorithms can not be expected to optimize resource utilization.","PeriodicalId":204185,"journal":{"name":"ACM '74","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '74","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1408800.1408843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A trace-driven model is used to study the effects of various schedulers and deadlock control algorithms, and their interactions, on response times in a general-purpose operating system. Jobs' requests for memory and processors are extracted from a production load and used to drive a detailed simulation program. The simulation results show that response time is more sensitive than CPU utilization to differences between schedulers and deadlock control algorithms. Preemptive scheduling improves response time but degrades CPU utilization. Preemptive deadlock control algorithms improve both measures of performance. There are significant interactions between schedulers and deadlock control algorithms. Deadlock control algorithms can not be expected to optimize resource utilization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各种死锁算法和作业调度器下响应时间的研究
跟踪驱动模型用于研究各种调度程序和死锁控制算法及其相互作用对通用操作系统中响应时间的影响。乔布斯对内存和处理器的要求是从生产负载中提取出来的,并用于驱动一个详细的模拟程序。仿真结果表明,响应时间比CPU利用率对调度程序和死锁控制算法的差异更为敏感。抢占式调度提高了响应时间,但降低了CPU利用率。抢占式死锁控制算法提高了这两种性能指标。调度程序和死锁控制算法之间存在重要的交互作用。死锁控制算法不能指望优化资源利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Skeleton planning spaces for non-numeric heuristic optimization* An on-line interactive audiographic learning system Impact analysis Language constructs for message handling in decentralized programs Design Automation in a computer science curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1