The Efficiency of Sovereign Debt Markets in the EMU: Truth or Mistruth?

Grzegorz Waszkiewicz
{"title":"The Efficiency of Sovereign Debt Markets in the EMU: Truth or Mistruth?","authors":"Grzegorz Waszkiewicz","doi":"10.31648/OEJ.5396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since the last financial crisis, the efficiency of financial markets has been widely challenged. On the basis of sovereign debt markets in the European Monetary Union (EMU), we tried to contrast some reservations about the market efficiency existing in the literature with findings coming from our empirical analysis of weak-form efficiency. To do so, we first outlined the crux of the efficient market hypothesis. Secondly, we show the main reservations in relation to this concept. Then, after a brief review of outcomes from contributions in this area, we conducted a three-stage empirical procedure that Worthington and Higgs (2006) as well as Borges (2009) had employed to stock markets analysis. Then, the results were evaluated and conclusions were drawn. To sum up, we did confirm the weak-form efficiency on examined sovereign debt markets from the EMU. That suggests that a random process plays a key role in shaping bond yields. Finally, neither theoretical nor practical reservations deflate the weak-form efficiency in the public debt markets of the EMU.","PeriodicalId":315965,"journal":{"name":"Olsztyn Economic Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Olsztyn Economic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31648/OEJ.5396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ever since the last financial crisis, the efficiency of financial markets has been widely challenged. On the basis of sovereign debt markets in the European Monetary Union (EMU), we tried to contrast some reservations about the market efficiency existing in the literature with findings coming from our empirical analysis of weak-form efficiency. To do so, we first outlined the crux of the efficient market hypothesis. Secondly, we show the main reservations in relation to this concept. Then, after a brief review of outcomes from contributions in this area, we conducted a three-stage empirical procedure that Worthington and Higgs (2006) as well as Borges (2009) had employed to stock markets analysis. Then, the results were evaluated and conclusions were drawn. To sum up, we did confirm the weak-form efficiency on examined sovereign debt markets from the EMU. That suggests that a random process plays a key role in shaping bond yields. Finally, neither theoretical nor practical reservations deflate the weak-form efficiency in the public debt markets of the EMU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲货币联盟主权债务市场的效率:对还是错?
自上次金融危机以来,金融市场的效率受到了广泛质疑。在欧洲货币联盟(EMU)主权债务市场的基础上,我们试图将文献中关于市场效率的一些保留意见与我们对弱形式效率的实证分析结果进行对比。为此,我们首先概述了有效市场假说的关键。第二,我们表明对这一概念的主要保留意见。然后,在简要回顾了这一领域贡献的结果之后,我们进行了沃辛顿和希格斯(2006)以及博尔赫斯(2009)用于股票市场分析的三阶段实证程序。然后对结果进行评价,得出结论。总而言之,我们确实证实了欧洲货币联盟(EMU)主权债务市场的弱形式效率。这表明,一个随机过程在债券收益率的形成中起着关键作用。最后,无论是理论还是实践上的保留,都没有削弱欧洲货币联盟公共债务市场的弱形式效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Models of Commercialization of Innovations in an Open Innovation Process Influence of a Financial Crisis and the Covid-19 Pandemic on Prices of Cereals in Poland Implementation of the Stabilizing Function of a Fiscal Policy in the Eurozone Countries Operating Surplus and its Importance in Financing Local Government Tasks on the Example of Municipalities of the Małopolskie Voivodeship Disaggregated Impact Analysis of Trade on Growth: The Role of Financial Openness in Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1