‘Consider If’: Levi, Langer, Agamben, and the Unthinkable

J. Geddes
{"title":"‘Consider If’: Levi, Langer, Agamben, and the Unthinkable","authors":"J. Geddes","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2020.1829822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, I explore Primo Levi’s command to his readers to ‘consider if’ the Muselmann is still a human, suggesting that such consideration requires an ongoing bracketing of resolution of the question it raises. Next I draw a connection between the bracketing of judgment of camp inmates that both Levi and Lawrence Langer call for, in Levi’s idea of ‘the gray zone’ and Langer’s idea of ‘choiceless choice.’ While the terms point to different phenomena, they share the idea that while we must dwell on and consider the testimonies of the camps, we are in no position to pass judgment on those who were there. Finally I turn to Giorgio Agamben’s Remnants of Auschwitz to argue that while Agamben’s book offers perhaps the most sustained reflection on the Muselmann in print, and might be seen as fulfilling Levi’s command to ‘consider if,’ he refuses to bracket resolution of the question of the Muselmann’s humanity and merges the conflicting options Levi commands us to continue considering.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2020.1829822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, I explore Primo Levi’s command to his readers to ‘consider if’ the Muselmann is still a human, suggesting that such consideration requires an ongoing bracketing of resolution of the question it raises. Next I draw a connection between the bracketing of judgment of camp inmates that both Levi and Lawrence Langer call for, in Levi’s idea of ‘the gray zone’ and Langer’s idea of ‘choiceless choice.’ While the terms point to different phenomena, they share the idea that while we must dwell on and consider the testimonies of the camps, we are in no position to pass judgment on those who were there. Finally I turn to Giorgio Agamben’s Remnants of Auschwitz to argue that while Agamben’s book offers perhaps the most sustained reflection on the Muselmann in print, and might be seen as fulfilling Levi’s command to ‘consider if,’ he refuses to bracket resolution of the question of the Muselmann’s humanity and merges the conflicting options Levi commands us to continue considering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《考虑如果》:利瓦伊、兰格、阿甘本和《不可思议》
在本文中,我探讨了普里莫·列维(Primo Levi)对读者的命令,即“考虑”穆斯林是否仍然是人类,这表明这种考虑需要对它提出的问题进行持续的解决。接下来,我将列维和劳伦斯·兰格所呼吁的对集中营囚犯的评判的分类联系起来,在列维的"灰色地带"和兰格的"无选择的选择"的观点中。虽然这些术语指向不同的现象,但他们都认为,虽然我们必须仔细考虑集中营的证词,但我们没有资格对那些在那里的人做出判断。最后,我转向乔治·阿甘本的《奥斯维辛的残余》,认为虽然阿甘本的书提供了对穆斯林的最持久的反思,并且可能被视为履行了利瓦伊的“考虑它”的命令,但他拒绝将穆斯林的人性问题的解决纳入其中,并将利瓦伊命令我们继续考虑的冲突选项合并在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Art Met History: Holocaust Exhibitions in Early Postwar Hungary ‘Because They Were Jews!’ The Postwar Artworks of David Friedmann as Eyewitness Testimonies Whose Barbarianism? Exhibiting Antifascism, the Resistance, and the Holocaust in Postwar Italy and Now “Lest We Forget”: Bringing Atrocity Home Through Large Photomurals Artists Behind Barbed Wire: Art Exhibitions in the Detention Camps in Cyprus, 1947–1948
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1