Truly Visual Caller ID? An Analysis of Anti-Robocall Applications and their Accessibility to Visually Impaired Users

Imani N. Sherman, Jasmine Bowers, Liz-Laure Laborde, J. Gilbert, Jaime Ruiz, Patrick Traynor
{"title":"Truly Visual Caller ID? An Analysis of Anti-Robocall Applications and their Accessibility to Visually Impaired Users","authors":"Imani N. Sherman, Jasmine Bowers, Liz-Laure Laborde, J. Gilbert, Jaime Ruiz, Patrick Traynor","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robocalls interrupt daily activity, cause financial harm, and influence users to ignore calls from unfamiliar numbers. Service providers and developers have created Anti-Robocall applications to attempt to restore trust in the phone and decrease the impact of robocalls on daily life. However, whether or not such applications meet accessibility standards and are therefore usable by vulnerable populations, particularly the visually impaired, is unknown. In this paper, we use a combination of the W3C’s Mobile Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (MWCAG) and interviews with 11 visually impaired users to establish accessibility metrics for Anti-Robocall applications. We then evaluate 56 Anti-Robocall applications for Android to assess whether they met the needs of the visually impaired community. Our results indicate that 100% of the applications fail to meet all basic accessibility guidelines including minimum color contrast, button labels (to assist screen readers), and automatic audible alerts. As a result, we show that despite the availability of a variety of tools to help developers identify and correct these problems, this important class of applications does not meet basic accessibility requirements. We conclude by suggesting viable paths forward that ensure inclusion and protection for the visually impaired community.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Robocalls interrupt daily activity, cause financial harm, and influence users to ignore calls from unfamiliar numbers. Service providers and developers have created Anti-Robocall applications to attempt to restore trust in the phone and decrease the impact of robocalls on daily life. However, whether or not such applications meet accessibility standards and are therefore usable by vulnerable populations, particularly the visually impaired, is unknown. In this paper, we use a combination of the W3C’s Mobile Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (MWCAG) and interviews with 11 visually impaired users to establish accessibility metrics for Anti-Robocall applications. We then evaluate 56 Anti-Robocall applications for Android to assess whether they met the needs of the visually impaired community. Our results indicate that 100% of the applications fail to meet all basic accessibility guidelines including minimum color contrast, button labels (to assist screen readers), and automatic audible alerts. As a result, we show that despite the availability of a variety of tools to help developers identify and correct these problems, this important class of applications does not meet basic accessibility requirements. We conclude by suggesting viable paths forward that ensure inclusion and protection for the visually impaired community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真正的可视来电显示?反机器人呼叫应用及其对视障用户的可及性分析
自动电话干扰日常活动,造成财务损失,并影响用户忽略来自陌生号码的电话。服务提供商和开发人员开发了反自动电话应用程序,试图恢复人们对电话的信任,减少自动电话对日常生活的影响。然而,这些应用程序是否符合无障碍标准,因此是否可供弱势群体,特别是视障人士使用,还不得而知。在本文中,我们结合了W3C的移动Web内容可访问性指南(MWCAG),并采访了11位视障用户,以建立反机器人呼叫应用程序的可访问性指标。然后,我们评估了56个Android反机器人呼叫应用程序,以评估它们是否满足视障群体的需求。我们的结果表明,100%的应用程序无法满足所有基本的可访问性准则,包括最小的颜色对比度、按钮标签(以帮助屏幕阅读器)和自动声音警报。因此,我们表明,尽管有各种各样的工具可以帮助开发人员识别和纠正这些问题,但这类重要的应用程序并不能满足基本的可访问性需求。最后,我们提出了可行的前进道路,以确保视障群体得到包容和保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Historical and Ideological Chasm between Engineering and Development Sustainability means inclusivity: engaging citizens in early stage smart city development Taiwan’s Ability to Reduce the Transmission of COVID-19: A Success Story Tesseract Optimization for Data Privacy and Sharing Economics Using Open Source Licensing to Regulate the Assembly of LAWS: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1