The Basics of Species at Risk Legislation in Alberta

Shaun Fluker, Jocelyn Stacey
{"title":"The Basics of Species at Risk Legislation in Alberta","authors":"Shaun Fluker, Jocelyn Stacey","doi":"10.29173/ALR269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Alberta's Wildlife Act and the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) to assess the legal protection of endangered species in Alberta. Most of the discussion related to provisions contained in SARA, as there is comparatively less to discuss under the Wildlife Act. The fact that legal protection for endangered species in Alberta consists primarily of federal statutory rules is unfortunate, as wildlife and its habitat are by and large property of the provincial Crown, and it is a general principle of constitutional law that the federal government cannot in substance legislate over provincial property under the guise of a regulatory scheme. The legal protections in SARA are, thus, for the most part restricted to species found on federal lands and to species that fall under federal legislative powers. This article demonstrates that the Alberta government has chosen to govern species at risk almost entirely by policy and discretionary power. The limited application of federal protections to provincial lands and the absence of meaningful protection in the Wildlife Act leads the authors to conclude that, despite a perception of legal protection for endangered species, such protection does not exist in Alberta.","PeriodicalId":346805,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/ALR269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

This article examines Alberta's Wildlife Act and the federal Species at Risk Act (SARA) to assess the legal protection of endangered species in Alberta. Most of the discussion related to provisions contained in SARA, as there is comparatively less to discuss under the Wildlife Act. The fact that legal protection for endangered species in Alberta consists primarily of federal statutory rules is unfortunate, as wildlife and its habitat are by and large property of the provincial Crown, and it is a general principle of constitutional law that the federal government cannot in substance legislate over provincial property under the guise of a regulatory scheme. The legal protections in SARA are, thus, for the most part restricted to species found on federal lands and to species that fall under federal legislative powers. This article demonstrates that the Alberta government has chosen to govern species at risk almost entirely by policy and discretionary power. The limited application of federal protections to provincial lands and the absence of meaningful protection in the Wildlife Act leads the authors to conclude that, despite a perception of legal protection for endangered species, such protection does not exist in Alberta.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾伯塔省濒危物种立法基础
本文考察了艾伯塔省的《野生动物法》和联邦《濒危物种法》,以评估艾伯塔省对濒危物种的法律保护。大多数讨论都与SARA所包含的条款有关,因为在野生动物法下讨论的内容相对较少。不幸的是,艾伯塔省对濒危物种的法律保护主要由联邦法规构成,因为野生动物及其栖息地基本上是省王室的财产,而宪法的一般原则是,联邦政府不能在监管计划的幌子下对省财产进行实质立法。因此,SARA的法律保护在很大程度上仅限于在联邦土地上发现的物种和属于联邦立法权力的物种。这篇文章表明,艾伯塔省政府选择了几乎完全通过政策和自由裁量权来管理濒危物种。联邦保护在省土地上的应用有限,《野生动物法》中缺乏有意义的保护,这使得作者得出结论,尽管对濒危物种有法律保护的看法,但这种保护在艾伯塔省并不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A tributação e o desenvolvimento sustentável (Taxation and Sustainable Development) U.S. Supreme Court Issues a Major Ruling on NPDES Permits Legal and Policy Issues in the Development of Nigeria’s Mining Sector: Charting the Way Forward A Cost Benefit Analysis of Shale Gas Well Bonding Systems in Pennsylvania Governance of Ecosystem Services Across Scales in Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1