2020 Supreme Court Commentary: Employment Law

J. Harkavy
{"title":"2020 Supreme Court Commentary: Employment Law","authors":"J. Harkavy","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3023745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article, the author's longstanding annual review of the Supreme Court's work in the employment area, examines in detail every decision of the 2016-2017 term relating to employment and labor law, with commentary on each case and additional observations about the Court's work in this term and the upcoming one. In particular, the author uses the latest term's decisions as a lens for examining broader aspects of the Court's jurisprudence, particularly in light of disruptive changes in the nature of the employment relationship and in the composition of the Court itself.","PeriodicalId":373008,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)","volume":"264 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Collective Bargaining Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3023745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article, the author's longstanding annual review of the Supreme Court's work in the employment area, examines in detail every decision of the 2016-2017 term relating to employment and labor law, with commentary on each case and additional observations about the Court's work in this term and the upcoming one. In particular, the author uses the latest term's decisions as a lens for examining broader aspects of the Court's jurisprudence, particularly in light of disruptive changes in the nature of the employment relationship and in the composition of the Court itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2020年最高法院评论:就业法
这篇文章是作者对最高法院在就业领域工作的长期年度回顾,详细审查了2016-2017年期间与就业和劳动法有关的每一项裁决,并对每个案件进行了评论,并对法院在这一任期和即将到来的任期的工作进行了额外的观察。特别是,作者使用最新术语的决定作为一个镜头来审查法院判例的更广泛方面,特别是考虑到雇用关系的性质和法院本身组成的破坏性变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Modest Blueprint for Representing Working People and Labor Unions in Fraught Times Economic Democracy in the 21st Century: The Vote in Labour, Capital and Public Services Trade Unions’ Rights, Work Councils’ Functions and the Legal Framework for Governing European Corporations: A Spanish Perspective Brief of Amicus Curiae Professor Samuel Estreicher in Support of Defendants-Appellees in Chamber of Commerce of United States v. City of Seattle, No. 17-35640 (9th Circuit) 2020 Supreme Court Commentary: Employment Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1